Wampum腰带的回归:伦理问题与美洲原住民档案材料的归还

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.19.1.33
A. Runde
{"title":"Wampum腰带的回归:伦理问题与美洲原住民档案材料的归还","authors":"A. Runde","doi":"10.3172/JIE.19.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In May 1988 a ceremony was held to celebrate the return of eleven wampum belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy in Grand River, Canada. Another commemoration took place in October 1989 when twelve wampum belts were returned to the Onondaga Nation in New York. Hundreds of people attended these formal ceremonies; tribal chiefs and clan mothers wore ceremonial dress and traditional food was prepared. These ceremonies are but two of many commemorating the repatriation of Native American cultural items to their original creators or owners. They are the results of a long process of Native American activism that emerged in the 1960s and culminated in the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1990. Numerous cultural and religious artifacts, works of art and human remains have been returned to their original owners over the past three decades as these communities have moved toward self-governance, and the world at large has come to recognize greater Native American sovereignty. However, the repatriation movement has not been without conflict. Questions about ownership, chain of custody, theft, responsibility, access, and economy have been raised and remain unresolved.These same types of questions apply to the repatriation of Native American materials in archives. The archival community must address problems such as the following: Who owns and cares for the archival materials concerning Native Americans that are now scattered across institutions in this country? Under what circumstances were they collected? Who now determines access policies to these sensitive materials? The Protocols for Native American Archival Materials from 2007 present guidelines regarding some of these issues. Using the return of the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy and the Onondaga Nation wampum belts as case studies, this paper will examine some of the ethical issues involved in the repatriation of archival materials and how these issues are treated in the Protocols.Wampum Belts as DocumentsIn everyday language the word wampum means \"money,\" and wampum has indeed served as a historical medium of trade and exchange throughout eastern North America, especially after the arrival of Dutch traders (Richter, 1992). Strictly speaking, wampum refers to beads made from the white and purple parts of shells native to the New England Coast. However, for the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Nations) wampum has far greater cultural significance than mere currency. According to the Onondaga Nation Web site wampum has many uses, including conveying social status. Each clan mother and tribal leader has a wampum string, which is passed from one tribal leader to the next with the office or title. At gatherings, the person holding the wampum string is given special attention; whoever is holding the wampum string is said to be speaking the truth. Wampum strings are also used to document agreements. The Onondaga Web site states, \"The speaker puts the words of the agreement into the wampum. Each speaker thereafter uses the wampum to remember the initial agreement and the history that has happened to date.\" Wampum can also have spiritual significance. For example, according to the Encyclopedia of North American Indians (1996), the Huron who adopted Christianity used wampum beads in their rosaries and even made belts with Latin inscriptions dedicated to various saints.Some wampum belts were specifically constructed to commemorate and document important events and treaties. They range in length from two to six feet and have patterns created by the interweaving of white and purple beads made from shells. Important agreements were generally represented by larger belts, and important agreements with a large amount of information were collectively stored and maintained by and in the tribal body (Rasmussen, 2007). The belts are entrusted to a hereditary keeper and brought out for ceremonial occasions when the wampum keeper reads the belt. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"33-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Return of Wampum Belts: Ethical Issues and the Repatriation of Native American Archival Materials\",\"authors\":\"A. Runde\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/JIE.19.1.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In May 1988 a ceremony was held to celebrate the return of eleven wampum belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy in Grand River, Canada. Another commemoration took place in October 1989 when twelve wampum belts were returned to the Onondaga Nation in New York. Hundreds of people attended these formal ceremonies; tribal chiefs and clan mothers wore ceremonial dress and traditional food was prepared. These ceremonies are but two of many commemorating the repatriation of Native American cultural items to their original creators or owners. They are the results of a long process of Native American activism that emerged in the 1960s and culminated in the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1990. Numerous cultural and religious artifacts, works of art and human remains have been returned to their original owners over the past three decades as these communities have moved toward self-governance, and the world at large has come to recognize greater Native American sovereignty. However, the repatriation movement has not been without conflict. Questions about ownership, chain of custody, theft, responsibility, access, and economy have been raised and remain unresolved.These same types of questions apply to the repatriation of Native American materials in archives. The archival community must address problems such as the following: Who owns and cares for the archival materials concerning Native Americans that are now scattered across institutions in this country? Under what circumstances were they collected? Who now determines access policies to these sensitive materials? The Protocols for Native American Archival Materials from 2007 present guidelines regarding some of these issues. Using the return of the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy and the Onondaga Nation wampum belts as case studies, this paper will examine some of the ethical issues involved in the repatriation of archival materials and how these issues are treated in the Protocols.Wampum Belts as DocumentsIn everyday language the word wampum means \\\"money,\\\" and wampum has indeed served as a historical medium of trade and exchange throughout eastern North America, especially after the arrival of Dutch traders (Richter, 1992). Strictly speaking, wampum refers to beads made from the white and purple parts of shells native to the New England Coast. However, for the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Nations) wampum has far greater cultural significance than mere currency. According to the Onondaga Nation Web site wampum has many uses, including conveying social status. Each clan mother and tribal leader has a wampum string, which is passed from one tribal leader to the next with the office or title. At gatherings, the person holding the wampum string is given special attention; whoever is holding the wampum string is said to be speaking the truth. Wampum strings are also used to document agreements. The Onondaga Web site states, \\\"The speaker puts the words of the agreement into the wampum. Each speaker thereafter uses the wampum to remember the initial agreement and the history that has happened to date.\\\" Wampum can also have spiritual significance. For example, according to the Encyclopedia of North American Indians (1996), the Huron who adopted Christianity used wampum beads in their rosaries and even made belts with Latin inscriptions dedicated to various saints.Some wampum belts were specifically constructed to commemorate and document important events and treaties. They range in length from two to six feet and have patterns created by the interweaving of white and purple beads made from shells. Important agreements were generally represented by larger belts, and important agreements with a large amount of information were collectively stored and maintained by and in the tribal body (Rasmussen, 2007). The belts are entrusted to a hereditary keeper and brought out for ceremonial occasions when the wampum keeper reads the belt. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"33-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.1.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1988年5月,加拿大格兰德河的易洛魁六族联盟举行了一场仪式,庆祝11条wampum腰带的归还。另一次纪念活动于1989年10月举行,当时12条wampum腰带被归还给纽约的奥农达加民族。数百人参加了这些正式的仪式;部落首领和部落母亲穿着仪式服装,准备传统食物。这些仪式只是众多纪念美洲土著文化物品归还其原始创造者或所有者的仪式中的两个。它们是20世纪60年代开始的印第安人激进主义长期进程的结果,并在1990年通过《印第安人坟墓保护和遣返法案》(NAGPRA)时达到高潮。在过去的三十年里,随着这些社区走向自治,许多文化和宗教文物、艺术品和人类遗骸都被归还给了原来的主人,整个世界都开始承认美洲原住民更大的主权。然而,遣返运动并非没有冲突。关于所有权、监管链、盗窃、责任、获取和经济的问题已经提出,但仍未得到解决。这些同样类型的问题也适用于档案中美洲原住民材料的归还。档案界必须解决以下问题:谁拥有和关心现在分散在这个国家各机构的有关美洲原住民的档案资料?他们是在什么情况下被收集的?现在谁来决定这些敏感材料的访问策略?2007年《美洲原住民档案材料议定书》就其中一些问题提出了指导方针。本文将以易洛魁六国联盟和奥农达加民族温皮姆带的归还为案例研究,探讨档案材料归还过程中涉及的一些伦理问题,以及《议定书》如何处理这些问题。在日常语言中,Wampum这个词的意思是“钱”,尤其是在荷兰商人到来之后,Wampum确实在北美东部充当了一种历史上的贸易和交换媒介(Richter, 1992)。严格来说,wampum指的是由原产于新英格兰海岸的贝壳的白色和紫色部分制成的珠子。然而,对于易洛魁人来说,温帕姆的文化意义远比货币重要。据奥农达加民族网站介绍,wampum有很多用途,包括传达社会地位。每个部落的母亲和部落首领都有一个wampum字符串,它通过办公室或头衔从一个部落首领传给下一个部落首领。在聚会上,拿着wampum弦的人会受到特别的关注;无论谁拿着温姆弦,就说他说的是真话。Wampum字符串也用于记录协议。奥农达加的网站上写道:“演讲者把协议的内容写进了纸里。此后,每个发言者都用wampum来记住最初的协议和迄今为止发生的历史。”Wampum还具有精神意义。例如,根据《北美印第安人百科全书》(1996),信奉基督教的休伦族人在他们的念珠中使用wampum珠,甚至制作了带有拉丁铭文的腰带,献给各种圣徒。一些wampum带是专门用来纪念和记录重要事件和条约的。它们的长度从2英尺到6英尺不等,图案由贝壳制成的白色和紫色珠子交织而成。重要的协议一般用较大的带表示,具有大量信息的重要协议由部落体共同存储和维护(Rasmussen, 2007)。腰带被委托给一位世袭的保管人,在仪式场合,当wampum保管人读到腰带时,就会拿出来。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Return of Wampum Belts: Ethical Issues and the Repatriation of Native American Archival Materials
In May 1988 a ceremony was held to celebrate the return of eleven wampum belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy in Grand River, Canada. Another commemoration took place in October 1989 when twelve wampum belts were returned to the Onondaga Nation in New York. Hundreds of people attended these formal ceremonies; tribal chiefs and clan mothers wore ceremonial dress and traditional food was prepared. These ceremonies are but two of many commemorating the repatriation of Native American cultural items to their original creators or owners. They are the results of a long process of Native American activism that emerged in the 1960s and culminated in the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1990. Numerous cultural and religious artifacts, works of art and human remains have been returned to their original owners over the past three decades as these communities have moved toward self-governance, and the world at large has come to recognize greater Native American sovereignty. However, the repatriation movement has not been without conflict. Questions about ownership, chain of custody, theft, responsibility, access, and economy have been raised and remain unresolved.These same types of questions apply to the repatriation of Native American materials in archives. The archival community must address problems such as the following: Who owns and cares for the archival materials concerning Native Americans that are now scattered across institutions in this country? Under what circumstances were they collected? Who now determines access policies to these sensitive materials? The Protocols for Native American Archival Materials from 2007 present guidelines regarding some of these issues. Using the return of the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy and the Onondaga Nation wampum belts as case studies, this paper will examine some of the ethical issues involved in the repatriation of archival materials and how these issues are treated in the Protocols.Wampum Belts as DocumentsIn everyday language the word wampum means "money," and wampum has indeed served as a historical medium of trade and exchange throughout eastern North America, especially after the arrival of Dutch traders (Richter, 1992). Strictly speaking, wampum refers to beads made from the white and purple parts of shells native to the New England Coast. However, for the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Nations) wampum has far greater cultural significance than mere currency. According to the Onondaga Nation Web site wampum has many uses, including conveying social status. Each clan mother and tribal leader has a wampum string, which is passed from one tribal leader to the next with the office or title. At gatherings, the person holding the wampum string is given special attention; whoever is holding the wampum string is said to be speaking the truth. Wampum strings are also used to document agreements. The Onondaga Web site states, "The speaker puts the words of the agreement into the wampum. Each speaker thereafter uses the wampum to remember the initial agreement and the history that has happened to date." Wampum can also have spiritual significance. For example, according to the Encyclopedia of North American Indians (1996), the Huron who adopted Christianity used wampum beads in their rosaries and even made belts with Latin inscriptions dedicated to various saints.Some wampum belts were specifically constructed to commemorate and document important events and treaties. They range in length from two to six feet and have patterns created by the interweaving of white and purple beads made from shells. Important agreements were generally represented by larger belts, and important agreements with a large amount of information were collectively stored and maintained by and in the tribal body (Rasmussen, 2007). The belts are entrusted to a hereditary keeper and brought out for ceremonial occasions when the wampum keeper reads the belt. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1