{"title":"从电影修复到数字仿真:数字复制时代的档案伦理准则","authors":"L. K. Mattock","doi":"10.3172/JIE.19.1.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Walter Benjamin laments the loss of the \"aura\" of the original work of art in his 1936 essay, \"The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction\" (Benjamin, 1969). Artist Douglas Davis revisits Benjamin's premise in his essay, \"The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction,\" suggesting that the mutability of the original has spawned a new era of creativity (Davis, 1995). As digital records quickly replace analog records, archivists are facing new challenges in preserving, describing, and providing continuing access to these new forms of digital multi-media. Traditional archival theory has centered around paper-based records for which archives have physical custody. These records are produced on a stable, human-readable medium. Digital records, however, are technologically dependent, unreadable to the human eye, and do not exist in a physical form. The preservation of these complicated records requires a rethinking of theory and practice and presents ethical challenges for which current codes of ethics provide little guidance.Moving image and other audiovisual archivists have faced many of these same challenges posed by digital documents through their work with analog media. The myriad formats incorporated under the umbrella term \"audiovisual media\" are also plagued by obsolescence and technological dependence. In addition, as analog formats become obsolete and information must be migrated and reformatted, archivists face a number of ethical decisions similar to those faced by archives preserving digital records.Currently, the Society of American Archivists (SAA) and other similar organizations provide little guidance for archivists working with audiovisual records. For this reason, the Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) has been working to develop its own code of ethics to establish a stronger professional identity within the archival profession. The organization provides important resources including The Moving Image, a journal \"dedicated to the crucial issues surrounding the preservation, archiving, and restoration of film, video, and digital moving images\" (Association of Moving Image Archivists, n.d). The International Federation of Film Archives (FIAF) also provides important resources, including The Journal of Film Preservation, and ethical guidelines for moving image archivists. A number of film history and theory journals (Film History, The Velvet Light Trap, and Cinema Journal) also offer outlets for audiovisual archivists to publish their research. Increasingly, audiovisual archivists must look outside the mainstream archival literature, which focuses on text-based records.On an Archival EdgeFilm has historically been marginalized as a distinct and separate medium in archives and other collecting institutions. Examples of this notion can be found at the beginnings of film history. To obtain copyright for their works, early filmmakers were required to submit paper-prints, copies of their films printed on rolls of photographic paper, to the Library of Congress. Today, many archives house film and other audiovisual media in their collection, but still regard these documents as distinct from textual records. A quote from the journal of an early advocate of film archives, still holds true today: \"the film was neither a print nor a book, nor-in-fact, everybody could say what it was not; but nobody could say what it was\" (Bottomore, 1995, p. 293). As a result of this marginalization, few archives have the ability to properly store, describe, and provide access to audiovisual media.In her discussion of appraisal, Nancy Marrellini summarizes the attitude toward archival audiovisual materials:... I save it all.... I don't have the equipment and resources right now-but one day I will and I'll deal with it then.... Some of the stuff might be really important to someone some day-and they'll pay big bucks for using it. The cost of reformatting is too steep for us. I'll just leave it all on the shelf for now and reformat the things that people request. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"74-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Film Restoration to Digital Emulation: The Archival Code of Ethics in the Age of Digital Reproduction\",\"authors\":\"L. K. Mattock\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/JIE.19.1.74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Walter Benjamin laments the loss of the \\\"aura\\\" of the original work of art in his 1936 essay, \\\"The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction\\\" (Benjamin, 1969). Artist Douglas Davis revisits Benjamin's premise in his essay, \\\"The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction,\\\" suggesting that the mutability of the original has spawned a new era of creativity (Davis, 1995). As digital records quickly replace analog records, archivists are facing new challenges in preserving, describing, and providing continuing access to these new forms of digital multi-media. Traditional archival theory has centered around paper-based records for which archives have physical custody. These records are produced on a stable, human-readable medium. Digital records, however, are technologically dependent, unreadable to the human eye, and do not exist in a physical form. The preservation of these complicated records requires a rethinking of theory and practice and presents ethical challenges for which current codes of ethics provide little guidance.Moving image and other audiovisual archivists have faced many of these same challenges posed by digital documents through their work with analog media. The myriad formats incorporated under the umbrella term \\\"audiovisual media\\\" are also plagued by obsolescence and technological dependence. In addition, as analog formats become obsolete and information must be migrated and reformatted, archivists face a number of ethical decisions similar to those faced by archives preserving digital records.Currently, the Society of American Archivists (SAA) and other similar organizations provide little guidance for archivists working with audiovisual records. For this reason, the Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) has been working to develop its own code of ethics to establish a stronger professional identity within the archival profession. The organization provides important resources including The Moving Image, a journal \\\"dedicated to the crucial issues surrounding the preservation, archiving, and restoration of film, video, and digital moving images\\\" (Association of Moving Image Archivists, n.d). The International Federation of Film Archives (FIAF) also provides important resources, including The Journal of Film Preservation, and ethical guidelines for moving image archivists. A number of film history and theory journals (Film History, The Velvet Light Trap, and Cinema Journal) also offer outlets for audiovisual archivists to publish their research. Increasingly, audiovisual archivists must look outside the mainstream archival literature, which focuses on text-based records.On an Archival EdgeFilm has historically been marginalized as a distinct and separate medium in archives and other collecting institutions. Examples of this notion can be found at the beginnings of film history. To obtain copyright for their works, early filmmakers were required to submit paper-prints, copies of their films printed on rolls of photographic paper, to the Library of Congress. Today, many archives house film and other audiovisual media in their collection, but still regard these documents as distinct from textual records. A quote from the journal of an early advocate of film archives, still holds true today: \\\"the film was neither a print nor a book, nor-in-fact, everybody could say what it was not; but nobody could say what it was\\\" (Bottomore, 1995, p. 293). As a result of this marginalization, few archives have the ability to properly store, describe, and provide access to audiovisual media.In her discussion of appraisal, Nancy Marrellini summarizes the attitude toward archival audiovisual materials:... I save it all.... I don't have the equipment and resources right now-but one day I will and I'll deal with it then.... Some of the stuff might be really important to someone some day-and they'll pay big bucks for using it. The cost of reformatting is too steep for us. I'll just leave it all on the shelf for now and reformat the things that people request. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"74-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.1.74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.1.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
Walter Benjamin在他1936年的文章《机械复制时代的艺术作品》(the work of art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Benjamin, 1969)中哀叹原作“光环”的丧失。艺术家道格拉斯·戴维斯(Douglas Davis)在他的文章《数字复制时代的艺术作品》(The Work of Art in The Age of Digital Reproduction)中重新审视了本杰明的假设,认为原作的可变性催生了一个创造性的新时代(Davis, 1995)。随着数字记录迅速取代模拟记录,档案工作者在保存、描述和持续提供这些新形式的数字多媒体方面面临着新的挑战。传统的档案理论以纸质记录为中心,而档案有实物保管。这些记录是在稳定的、人类可读的介质上产生的。然而,数字记录依赖于技术,人眼无法读取,并且不以物理形式存在。保存这些复杂的记录需要对理论和实践进行重新思考,并提出道德挑战,而目前的道德规范几乎没有提供指导。动态图像和其他视听档案保管员在使用模拟媒体工作时,也面临着数字文件带来的许多同样的挑战。在“视听媒体”这个总称下的无数形式也受到过时和技术依赖的困扰。此外,随着模拟格式变得过时,信息必须迁移和重新格式化,档案管理员面临着许多道德决策,类似于保存数字记录的档案所面临的决策。目前,美国档案工作者协会(SAA)和其他类似组织几乎没有为档案工作者提供视听记录方面的指导。出于这个原因,运动影像档案工作者协会(AMIA)一直在努力制定自己的道德准则,以在档案行业中建立更强的职业身份。该组织提供了重要的资源,包括《运动图像》,一本“致力于围绕电影、视频和数字运动图像的保存、存档和修复的关键问题”的杂志(运动图像档案工作者协会,无日期)。国际电影档案联合会(FIAF)也提供重要的资源,包括《电影保存杂志》和运动影像档案工作者的道德准则。一些电影史和理论期刊(《电影史》、《丝绒陷阱》和《电影杂志》)也为视听档案保管员提供了发表研究成果的渠道。越来越多的视听档案工作者必须把目光投向主流档案文献之外,而主流文献的重点是基于文本的记录。在档案馆和其他收藏机构中,电影作为一种独特而独立的媒介在历史上一直被边缘化。这种观念的例子可以在电影史的开端找到。为了获得作品的版权,早期的电影制作人被要求向国会图书馆提交纸质印刷品,即用相纸卷印刷的电影副本。今天,许多档案馆收藏了电影和其他视听媒体,但仍然将这些文件与文本记录区分开来。一位早期倡导电影档案的人在杂志上引用的一句话,今天仍然适用:“这部电影既不是印刷品,也不是书,事实上,每个人都可以说它不是什么;但没有人能说出它是什么”(Bottomore, 1995, p. 293)。由于这种边缘化,很少有档案馆有能力适当地储存、描述和提供视听媒体。Nancy Marrellini在她关于鉴定的讨论中总结了对档案视听材料的态度:…我保存下来....我现在没有设备和资源,但总有一天我会的,到时候我会处理它....有些东西可能在某一天对某人来说真的很重要——他们会为使用它支付大笔费用。重新格式化的费用对我们来说太高了。我现在把它们都放在架子上,重新格式化人们要求的东西。...
From Film Restoration to Digital Emulation: The Archival Code of Ethics in the Age of Digital Reproduction
Walter Benjamin laments the loss of the "aura" of the original work of art in his 1936 essay, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (Benjamin, 1969). Artist Douglas Davis revisits Benjamin's premise in his essay, "The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction," suggesting that the mutability of the original has spawned a new era of creativity (Davis, 1995). As digital records quickly replace analog records, archivists are facing new challenges in preserving, describing, and providing continuing access to these new forms of digital multi-media. Traditional archival theory has centered around paper-based records for which archives have physical custody. These records are produced on a stable, human-readable medium. Digital records, however, are technologically dependent, unreadable to the human eye, and do not exist in a physical form. The preservation of these complicated records requires a rethinking of theory and practice and presents ethical challenges for which current codes of ethics provide little guidance.Moving image and other audiovisual archivists have faced many of these same challenges posed by digital documents through their work with analog media. The myriad formats incorporated under the umbrella term "audiovisual media" are also plagued by obsolescence and technological dependence. In addition, as analog formats become obsolete and information must be migrated and reformatted, archivists face a number of ethical decisions similar to those faced by archives preserving digital records.Currently, the Society of American Archivists (SAA) and other similar organizations provide little guidance for archivists working with audiovisual records. For this reason, the Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) has been working to develop its own code of ethics to establish a stronger professional identity within the archival profession. The organization provides important resources including The Moving Image, a journal "dedicated to the crucial issues surrounding the preservation, archiving, and restoration of film, video, and digital moving images" (Association of Moving Image Archivists, n.d). The International Federation of Film Archives (FIAF) also provides important resources, including The Journal of Film Preservation, and ethical guidelines for moving image archivists. A number of film history and theory journals (Film History, The Velvet Light Trap, and Cinema Journal) also offer outlets for audiovisual archivists to publish their research. Increasingly, audiovisual archivists must look outside the mainstream archival literature, which focuses on text-based records.On an Archival EdgeFilm has historically been marginalized as a distinct and separate medium in archives and other collecting institutions. Examples of this notion can be found at the beginnings of film history. To obtain copyright for their works, early filmmakers were required to submit paper-prints, copies of their films printed on rolls of photographic paper, to the Library of Congress. Today, many archives house film and other audiovisual media in their collection, but still regard these documents as distinct from textual records. A quote from the journal of an early advocate of film archives, still holds true today: "the film was neither a print nor a book, nor-in-fact, everybody could say what it was not; but nobody could say what it was" (Bottomore, 1995, p. 293). As a result of this marginalization, few archives have the ability to properly store, describe, and provide access to audiovisual media.In her discussion of appraisal, Nancy Marrellini summarizes the attitude toward archival audiovisual materials:... I save it all.... I don't have the equipment and resources right now-but one day I will and I'll deal with it then.... Some of the stuff might be really important to someone some day-and they'll pay big bucks for using it. The cost of reformatting is too steep for us. I'll just leave it all on the shelf for now and reformat the things that people request. …