信息伦理的开端:对记忆与意义的反思

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2011-09-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.20.2.15
M. M. Smith
{"title":"信息伦理的开端:对记忆与意义的反思","authors":"M. M. Smith","doi":"10.3172/JIE.20.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These days in my encore career as a hospice chaplain, I have the satisfaction of using my knowledge of information ethics in amazing new ways. As one of the pioneers in our field, I look back on the issues we tackled prior to becoming main stream and I am grateful to be able to continue my involvement in critical issues surrounding death and dying as professional, pastor, and a participant observer. In the world of health care and hospice, the stakes are high and decisions about life and death require careful use of information and information technologies. I often think of the model I presented in 1992 to detail the scope of information ethics and am pleased at how well it covers the significant issues I think about in my work today providing support for families before and after loss. My work is personal as well as professional with real people, death, grief, change, and hope. Information use and education is a huge part of what hospice provides patients and families in making the best choices in tough situations.The Scope of Information Ethics: The BeginningsWhen I began to think about information ethics in the late eighties, the closest field for comparison was computer ethics. The scope I had in mind was larger and included not only what was then called \"information\" but also the world of knowledge including the philosophy of knowledge. While exploring the philosophy of knowledge, I found the fields of philosophy of technology and the philosophy of science. Needing to attempt something, I started with five working categories to try on others. They were: Access, Ownership, Privacy, Security, and Community. They fit nicely in a star shape and provided a visual image to stimulate discussion.The five can be placed on the star in a variety of places and various comparisons can be made among them. Each one of the five highlights a key element uniting a wide variety of issues, problems, and dilemmas in the years since I first described it as a place to begin for the scope of information ethics and continues to be useful in my hospice work.Information is so very powerful in matters of patient care, family/caregiver education, government regulations, and public policy. Balancing patient autonomy and family responsibilities is not simple. Choosing hospice or palliative care rather than active treatment is a decision more gray than black or white. New drugs and treatments become available, as technologies and laws change quickly. Valuing both patient autonomy and family or physician decisionmaking get complicated by the need to prepare advanced directives and then to maintain informed consent at every step as the patient declines. My involvement now is close to the people who need good information and help using it under pressure. Having a very different angle from which to view information ethics issues and how much they matter to people in their last months is extremely rewarding. In this brief reflection, I hope to offer some insights from the early years of information ethics and share a few ideas for future study and reflection.Background and BiasIn the years of my active involvement in higher education and particularly in professional education of clergy and librarians, I have been fortunate to be a woman in two professional groups that have undergone major changes. Certainly, since I completed college in 1967 and seminary in 1970, large numbers of women have entered the ordained clergy. At Duke, I was the only woman to graduate with my entering class in the Master of Divinity program. A few others graduated later but not many but the numbers went up quickly. Today women who were in seminary in those years are retiring from long pastorates and terms as bishops. Also in the Roman Catholic Church, the roles of women have changed. For example, Roman Catholic lay women now are numerously in professional hospital chaplaincy and related careers such as hospice or prison chaplains. A search of the published literature and presenters at conferences show the significant impact that women have had in religious studies and in faithrelated professions. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"15-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Beginnings of Information Ethics: Reflections on Memory and Meaning\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/JIE.20.2.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"These days in my encore career as a hospice chaplain, I have the satisfaction of using my knowledge of information ethics in amazing new ways. As one of the pioneers in our field, I look back on the issues we tackled prior to becoming main stream and I am grateful to be able to continue my involvement in critical issues surrounding death and dying as professional, pastor, and a participant observer. In the world of health care and hospice, the stakes are high and decisions about life and death require careful use of information and information technologies. I often think of the model I presented in 1992 to detail the scope of information ethics and am pleased at how well it covers the significant issues I think about in my work today providing support for families before and after loss. My work is personal as well as professional with real people, death, grief, change, and hope. Information use and education is a huge part of what hospice provides patients and families in making the best choices in tough situations.The Scope of Information Ethics: The BeginningsWhen I began to think about information ethics in the late eighties, the closest field for comparison was computer ethics. The scope I had in mind was larger and included not only what was then called \\\"information\\\" but also the world of knowledge including the philosophy of knowledge. While exploring the philosophy of knowledge, I found the fields of philosophy of technology and the philosophy of science. Needing to attempt something, I started with five working categories to try on others. They were: Access, Ownership, Privacy, Security, and Community. They fit nicely in a star shape and provided a visual image to stimulate discussion.The five can be placed on the star in a variety of places and various comparisons can be made among them. Each one of the five highlights a key element uniting a wide variety of issues, problems, and dilemmas in the years since I first described it as a place to begin for the scope of information ethics and continues to be useful in my hospice work.Information is so very powerful in matters of patient care, family/caregiver education, government regulations, and public policy. Balancing patient autonomy and family responsibilities is not simple. Choosing hospice or palliative care rather than active treatment is a decision more gray than black or white. New drugs and treatments become available, as technologies and laws change quickly. Valuing both patient autonomy and family or physician decisionmaking get complicated by the need to prepare advanced directives and then to maintain informed consent at every step as the patient declines. My involvement now is close to the people who need good information and help using it under pressure. Having a very different angle from which to view information ethics issues and how much they matter to people in their last months is extremely rewarding. In this brief reflection, I hope to offer some insights from the early years of information ethics and share a few ideas for future study and reflection.Background and BiasIn the years of my active involvement in higher education and particularly in professional education of clergy and librarians, I have been fortunate to be a woman in two professional groups that have undergone major changes. Certainly, since I completed college in 1967 and seminary in 1970, large numbers of women have entered the ordained clergy. At Duke, I was the only woman to graduate with my entering class in the Master of Divinity program. A few others graduated later but not many but the numbers went up quickly. Today women who were in seminary in those years are retiring from long pastorates and terms as bishops. Also in the Roman Catholic Church, the roles of women have changed. For example, Roman Catholic lay women now are numerously in professional hospital chaplaincy and related careers such as hospice or prison chaplains. A search of the published literature and presenters at conferences show the significant impact that women have had in religious studies and in faithrelated professions. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"15-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.20.2.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.20.2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这些天,在我作为临终关怀牧师的职业生涯中,我对以惊人的新方式使用我的信息伦理知识感到满意。作为该领域的先驱之一,我回顾了我们在成为主流之前解决的问题,我很感激能够继续以专业人士、牧师和参与者观察者的身份参与有关死亡和临终的关键问题。在医疗保健和临终关怀领域,风险很高,有关生与死的决定需要谨慎使用信息和信息技术。我经常想到我在1992年提出的模型,以详细说明信息伦理的范围,我很高兴它涵盖了我今天在工作中所考虑的重要问题,即为失去亲人之前和之后的家庭提供支持。我的作品是私人的,也是专业的,与真实的人,死亡,悲伤,变化和希望。信息的使用和教育是安宁疗护提供给病人和家属在艰难情况下做出最佳选择的重要部分。信息伦理的范围:开端当我在八十年代末开始思考信息伦理时,最接近的比较领域是计算机伦理。我心目中的范围更大,不仅包括当时所谓的“信息”,还包括知识的世界,包括知识的哲学。在探索知识哲学的过程中,我发现了技术哲学和科学哲学的领域。为了尝试一些东西,我从五个工作类别开始尝试。它们是:访问、所有权、隐私、安全和社区。它们很好地贴合在一个星形上,提供了一个视觉形象来激发讨论。这五颗星可以放在各种各样的地方,它们之间可以进行各种比较。自从我第一次将其描述为信息伦理范围的起点,并在我的临终关怀工作中继续发挥作用以来,这五个要点中的每一个都突出了一个关键因素,将各种各样的问题、问题和困境联系在一起。在病人护理、家庭/照顾者教育、政府法规和公共政策方面,信息是非常强大的。平衡病人自主权和家庭责任并不简单。选择安宁疗护或缓和疗护,而非积极治疗,是一个非黑即白的决定。随着技术和法律的迅速变化,新的药物和治疗方法变得可用。评估病人的自主权和家庭或医生的决定变得复杂,因为需要准备先进的指示,然后在病人衰落的每一步都保持知情同意。我现在的参与是接近那些需要好的信息并帮助他们在压力下使用这些信息的人。从一个非常不同的角度来看待信息伦理问题,以及它们对人们在生命的最后几个月有多重要,这是非常有益的。在这篇简短的反思中,我希望提供一些早期信息伦理的见解,并分享一些可供未来研究和反思的想法。背景和偏见在我积极参与高等教育,特别是神职人员和图书馆员的职业教育的这些年里,我很幸运地成为两个经历了重大变化的专业群体中的一名女性。当然,自从我1967年完成大学学业,1970年完成神学院学业以来,大量女性进入了神职人员的行列。在杜克大学(Duke),我是班里唯一一个从神学硕士项目毕业的女性。后来还有一些人毕业,但人数不多,但人数很快就上升了。今天,那些年在神学院的女性正在从长期的牧师和主教任期中退休。在罗马天主教会中,女性的角色也发生了变化。例如,罗马天主教的平信徒妇女现在有许多从事专业医院牧师和相关职业,如临终关怀或监狱牧师。对已发表的文献和会议上的演讲者的研究表明,妇女在宗教研究和与信仰有关的职业中产生了重大影响。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Beginnings of Information Ethics: Reflections on Memory and Meaning
These days in my encore career as a hospice chaplain, I have the satisfaction of using my knowledge of information ethics in amazing new ways. As one of the pioneers in our field, I look back on the issues we tackled prior to becoming main stream and I am grateful to be able to continue my involvement in critical issues surrounding death and dying as professional, pastor, and a participant observer. In the world of health care and hospice, the stakes are high and decisions about life and death require careful use of information and information technologies. I often think of the model I presented in 1992 to detail the scope of information ethics and am pleased at how well it covers the significant issues I think about in my work today providing support for families before and after loss. My work is personal as well as professional with real people, death, grief, change, and hope. Information use and education is a huge part of what hospice provides patients and families in making the best choices in tough situations.The Scope of Information Ethics: The BeginningsWhen I began to think about information ethics in the late eighties, the closest field for comparison was computer ethics. The scope I had in mind was larger and included not only what was then called "information" but also the world of knowledge including the philosophy of knowledge. While exploring the philosophy of knowledge, I found the fields of philosophy of technology and the philosophy of science. Needing to attempt something, I started with five working categories to try on others. They were: Access, Ownership, Privacy, Security, and Community. They fit nicely in a star shape and provided a visual image to stimulate discussion.The five can be placed on the star in a variety of places and various comparisons can be made among them. Each one of the five highlights a key element uniting a wide variety of issues, problems, and dilemmas in the years since I first described it as a place to begin for the scope of information ethics and continues to be useful in my hospice work.Information is so very powerful in matters of patient care, family/caregiver education, government regulations, and public policy. Balancing patient autonomy and family responsibilities is not simple. Choosing hospice or palliative care rather than active treatment is a decision more gray than black or white. New drugs and treatments become available, as technologies and laws change quickly. Valuing both patient autonomy and family or physician decisionmaking get complicated by the need to prepare advanced directives and then to maintain informed consent at every step as the patient declines. My involvement now is close to the people who need good information and help using it under pressure. Having a very different angle from which to view information ethics issues and how much they matter to people in their last months is extremely rewarding. In this brief reflection, I hope to offer some insights from the early years of information ethics and share a few ideas for future study and reflection.Background and BiasIn the years of my active involvement in higher education and particularly in professional education of clergy and librarians, I have been fortunate to be a woman in two professional groups that have undergone major changes. Certainly, since I completed college in 1967 and seminary in 1970, large numbers of women have entered the ordained clergy. At Duke, I was the only woman to graduate with my entering class in the Master of Divinity program. A few others graduated later but not many but the numbers went up quickly. Today women who were in seminary in those years are retiring from long pastorates and terms as bishops. Also in the Roman Catholic Church, the roles of women have changed. For example, Roman Catholic lay women now are numerously in professional hospital chaplaincy and related careers such as hospice or prison chaplains. A search of the published literature and presenters at conferences show the significant impact that women have had in religious studies and in faithrelated professions. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1