万物自存:纳米时代知识产权重新定义的前奏

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2011-04-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.20.1.12
D. Koepsell
{"title":"万物自存:纳米时代知识产权重新定义的前奏","authors":"D. Koepsell","doi":"10.3172/JIE.20.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have been confronted in the last hundred years with a rapidly changing technological environment. This environment has brought with it great wealth and prosperity, and there is no doubt that emerging concepts and applications of intellectual property (IP) have aided our scientific, technological, and economic expansion. Copyrights and patents offer monopolistic rights to authors and inventors over their creations, ensuring profits for fixed terms, and providing fortune as well as fame for the most successful inventors and authors. Monopoly rights are strong incentives to create both utilitarian and aesthetic works.Recently, emerging technologies have challenged traditional IP theory and practice. Consider the rise of computerized phenomena, and the proliferation of software and instantaneous communications through the Internet. Software has been considered a kind of hybrid, treated both as a patentable invention and as copyrightable expressions. In my first book, The Ontology of Cyberspace, I consider how software has revealed that our distinctions between copyrightable and patentable objects are artificial and illogical. I argue that all intentionally produced, man-made objects are expressions, and that computerization has merely revealed how one expression is very much like another. More recently, I have considered the question of patenting un-modified genes. In the course of that discussion, I further criticize the application of existing IP to genomics and genetics, at least where patents have issued for unmodified genes or l ife-forms. In all of my work, I have sought to uncover the ontologies (descriptions of the objects and relations involved) of the underlying objects. I have done this believing that once we reveal the nature of things (like expressions, machines, software, and genes, as well as relations and social objects like property, ownership, and intentions) we could then sensibly sort out logical errors and inefficiencies in public policies.We are now on the cusp of a new engineering breakthrough that will once again challenge our relation to our technological world, and likely pose new challenges to the application of traditional IP. Nanotechnology involves the construction of materials and objects at the ?nano-scale,? beginning at the molecular level. Theoretically, this will mean cheap and abundant objects of any size and shape, more-or-less instantly created, with little-to-no waste, and constructed anywhere and at any time. The science-fiction notion of simply dialing up an object and having it constructed on the spot, molecule-by-molecule, may well be decades away or further, but it is the end-goal of many who pursue nanotechnology research. Even so, we will begin facing unique challenges about the nature of intellectual property as the dividing lines between ideas and expressions further blur, and matter itself becomes programmable.Intellectual property has become a major force economically and culturally, impelling in part our hyperbolic economic and technological growth in the past century, and influencing both cultures and economies world-wide. Historically, the emergence of intellectual property as a class of objects is relatively new. This class of objects, which includes things that are patentable, copyrightable, and trademarkable, has evolved since its inception both significantly and rapidly. Let's look briefly at the evolution, form, and purposes of intellectual property law, and then consider how and to what extent new material technologies will challenge current notions of IP.The Emergence of Intellectual PropertyIntellectual property is often mistakenly thought to protect ideas in much the same way that ordinary property law protects things. In fact, there never has been any legally-recognized protection for ideas themselves, but only for various forms of expressions. Beginning around the time of the Renaissance, in Britain and Italy, the first legally-sanctioned monopolies over inventions and works of authorship were created. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"12-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Things in Themselves: A Prolegomenon to Redefining Intellectual Property in the Nano-Age\",\"authors\":\"D. Koepsell\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/JIE.20.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have been confronted in the last hundred years with a rapidly changing technological environment. This environment has brought with it great wealth and prosperity, and there is no doubt that emerging concepts and applications of intellectual property (IP) have aided our scientific, technological, and economic expansion. Copyrights and patents offer monopolistic rights to authors and inventors over their creations, ensuring profits for fixed terms, and providing fortune as well as fame for the most successful inventors and authors. Monopoly rights are strong incentives to create both utilitarian and aesthetic works.Recently, emerging technologies have challenged traditional IP theory and practice. Consider the rise of computerized phenomena, and the proliferation of software and instantaneous communications through the Internet. Software has been considered a kind of hybrid, treated both as a patentable invention and as copyrightable expressions. In my first book, The Ontology of Cyberspace, I consider how software has revealed that our distinctions between copyrightable and patentable objects are artificial and illogical. I argue that all intentionally produced, man-made objects are expressions, and that computerization has merely revealed how one expression is very much like another. More recently, I have considered the question of patenting un-modified genes. In the course of that discussion, I further criticize the application of existing IP to genomics and genetics, at least where patents have issued for unmodified genes or l ife-forms. In all of my work, I have sought to uncover the ontologies (descriptions of the objects and relations involved) of the underlying objects. I have done this believing that once we reveal the nature of things (like expressions, machines, software, and genes, as well as relations and social objects like property, ownership, and intentions) we could then sensibly sort out logical errors and inefficiencies in public policies.We are now on the cusp of a new engineering breakthrough that will once again challenge our relation to our technological world, and likely pose new challenges to the application of traditional IP. Nanotechnology involves the construction of materials and objects at the ?nano-scale,? beginning at the molecular level. Theoretically, this will mean cheap and abundant objects of any size and shape, more-or-less instantly created, with little-to-no waste, and constructed anywhere and at any time. The science-fiction notion of simply dialing up an object and having it constructed on the spot, molecule-by-molecule, may well be decades away or further, but it is the end-goal of many who pursue nanotechnology research. Even so, we will begin facing unique challenges about the nature of intellectual property as the dividing lines between ideas and expressions further blur, and matter itself becomes programmable.Intellectual property has become a major force economically and culturally, impelling in part our hyperbolic economic and technological growth in the past century, and influencing both cultures and economies world-wide. Historically, the emergence of intellectual property as a class of objects is relatively new. This class of objects, which includes things that are patentable, copyrightable, and trademarkable, has evolved since its inception both significantly and rapidly. Let's look briefly at the evolution, form, and purposes of intellectual property law, and then consider how and to what extent new material technologies will challenge current notions of IP.The Emergence of Intellectual PropertyIntellectual property is often mistakenly thought to protect ideas in much the same way that ordinary property law protects things. In fact, there never has been any legally-recognized protection for ideas themselves, but only for various forms of expressions. Beginning around the time of the Renaissance, in Britain and Italy, the first legally-sanctioned monopolies over inventions and works of authorship were created. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"12-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.20.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.20.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的一百年里,我们面临着一个快速变化的技术环境。这种环境带来了巨大的财富和繁荣,毫无疑问,知识产权的新兴概念和应用有助于我们的科学、技术和经济发展。版权和专利为作者和发明家提供了对其创作的垄断权,确保了固定期限内的利润,并为最成功的发明家和作家提供了财富和名声。垄断权是创作功利性和审美性作品的强大动力。近年来,新兴技术对传统知识产权理论和实践提出了挑战。考虑到计算机化现象的兴起,以及通过互联网的软件和即时通信的扩散。软件一直被认为是一种混合体,既被视为可获得专利的发明,也被视为可获得版权的表达。在我的第一本书《网络空间本体论》(The Ontology of Cyberspace)中,我考虑了软件如何揭示了我们对可获得版权和可获得专利的对象的区分是人为的和不合逻辑的。我认为,所有有意制造的人造物体都是表达,计算机化只不过揭示了一种表达是如何与另一种表达非常相似。最近,我考虑了为未经修改的基因申请专利的问题。在讨论过程中,我进一步批评了将现有知识产权应用于基因组学和遗传学,至少在未修改基因或生命形式的专利中。在我所有的工作中,我都试图揭示底层对象的本体(对对象和所涉及的关系的描述)。我这样做是相信,一旦我们揭示了事物的本质(如表达、机器、软件和基因,以及关系和社会对象,如财产、所有权和意图),我们就可以明智地整理出公共政策中的逻辑错误和效率低下。我们现在正处于一个新的工程突破的尖端,这将再次挑战我们与技术世界的关系,并可能对传统知识产权的应用提出新的挑战。纳米技术涉及在纳米尺度上构建材料和物体。从分子水平开始。从理论上讲,这将意味着任何大小和形状的廉价和丰富的物体,或多或少是即时制造的,几乎没有浪费,可以随时随地建造。科幻小说中简单地把一个物体拨号,然后在现场一个分子一个分子地构建出来,这可能还需要几十年甚至更长时间,但这是许多从事纳米技术研究的人的最终目标。即便如此,随着思想和表达之间的分界线进一步模糊,物质本身变得可编程,我们将开始面临关于知识产权本质的独特挑战。知识产权已成为经济和文化上的一股重要力量,在一定程度上推动了我们上个世纪的双曲线经济和技术增长,并影响着世界各地的文化和经济。从历史上看,知识产权作为一类客体的出现相对较新。这类对象,包括可申请专利、可获得版权和可注册商标的东西,从一开始就发生了重大而迅速的变化。让我们简要地看一下知识产权法的演变、形式和目的,然后考虑新材料技术将如何以及在多大程度上挑战当前的知识产权概念。知识产权的出现人们常常错误地认为,知识产权保护思想的方式与普通物权法保护物品的方式大致相同。事实上,对思想本身从来没有任何法律认可的保护,而只是对各种形式的表达。大约从文艺复兴时期开始,在英国和意大利,对发明和原创作品的合法垄断出现了。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Things in Themselves: A Prolegomenon to Redefining Intellectual Property in the Nano-Age
We have been confronted in the last hundred years with a rapidly changing technological environment. This environment has brought with it great wealth and prosperity, and there is no doubt that emerging concepts and applications of intellectual property (IP) have aided our scientific, technological, and economic expansion. Copyrights and patents offer monopolistic rights to authors and inventors over their creations, ensuring profits for fixed terms, and providing fortune as well as fame for the most successful inventors and authors. Monopoly rights are strong incentives to create both utilitarian and aesthetic works.Recently, emerging technologies have challenged traditional IP theory and practice. Consider the rise of computerized phenomena, and the proliferation of software and instantaneous communications through the Internet. Software has been considered a kind of hybrid, treated both as a patentable invention and as copyrightable expressions. In my first book, The Ontology of Cyberspace, I consider how software has revealed that our distinctions between copyrightable and patentable objects are artificial and illogical. I argue that all intentionally produced, man-made objects are expressions, and that computerization has merely revealed how one expression is very much like another. More recently, I have considered the question of patenting un-modified genes. In the course of that discussion, I further criticize the application of existing IP to genomics and genetics, at least where patents have issued for unmodified genes or l ife-forms. In all of my work, I have sought to uncover the ontologies (descriptions of the objects and relations involved) of the underlying objects. I have done this believing that once we reveal the nature of things (like expressions, machines, software, and genes, as well as relations and social objects like property, ownership, and intentions) we could then sensibly sort out logical errors and inefficiencies in public policies.We are now on the cusp of a new engineering breakthrough that will once again challenge our relation to our technological world, and likely pose new challenges to the application of traditional IP. Nanotechnology involves the construction of materials and objects at the ?nano-scale,? beginning at the molecular level. Theoretically, this will mean cheap and abundant objects of any size and shape, more-or-less instantly created, with little-to-no waste, and constructed anywhere and at any time. The science-fiction notion of simply dialing up an object and having it constructed on the spot, molecule-by-molecule, may well be decades away or further, but it is the end-goal of many who pursue nanotechnology research. Even so, we will begin facing unique challenges about the nature of intellectual property as the dividing lines between ideas and expressions further blur, and matter itself becomes programmable.Intellectual property has become a major force economically and culturally, impelling in part our hyperbolic economic and technological growth in the past century, and influencing both cultures and economies world-wide. Historically, the emergence of intellectual property as a class of objects is relatively new. This class of objects, which includes things that are patentable, copyrightable, and trademarkable, has evolved since its inception both significantly and rapidly. Let's look briefly at the evolution, form, and purposes of intellectual property law, and then consider how and to what extent new material technologies will challenge current notions of IP.The Emergence of Intellectual PropertyIntellectual property is often mistakenly thought to protect ideas in much the same way that ordinary property law protects things. In fact, there never has been any legally-recognized protection for ideas themselves, but only for various forms of expressions. Beginning around the time of the Renaissance, in Britain and Italy, the first legally-sanctioned monopolies over inventions and works of authorship were created. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1