服务器室里的大象:面对IT职能中对道德官员的需求

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2012-04-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.21.1.27
S. Ponelis, J. Britz
{"title":"服务器室里的大象:面对IT职能中对道德官员的需求","authors":"S. Ponelis, J. Britz","doi":"10.3172/JIE.21.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionOrganizations tend to view governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) as an overhead but a poor economy increases the likelihood of fraud, bribery, and corruption for individuals beyond the pressure of reaching often unrealistic organizational targets. Governance is the process by which policies are set and decision-making is executed; risk management ensures that important business processes and behaviors remain within the tolerances associated with those policies and decisions, going beyond that which creates an unacceptable potential for loss; and compliance is the process of adherence to policies and decisions. The massive public failures in GRC around the globe in recent years as evidenced by Enron, WorldCom, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers mean that organizations and employees are under increasing pressure to conduct their business operations not only effectively and profitably but also ethically-and be able to prove it to regulators, in the courts, to the press, and to the public. The risks associated with inappropriate ethical behavior have grown in number, likelihood, and severity. Ensuring ethical behavior among employees can gain organizations the goodwill and trust of their stakeholders and clients, avoid unfavorable publicity, and protect them and their employees from legal action. Although the importance of ethics in IT has been recognized for several decades in the IT field, to date very little consideration has been given to the need for an ethics specialized role dedicated to the IT function. At the same time, the broader culture within a country influences its business culture that in turn influences organizational cultures as well as its legislation, which impacts how ethical behavior in organizations is viewed and promoted.In this paper we argue for such a specialized role in IT in the form of an ethics officer using the U.S. as point of departure. To this end this paper is structured as follows: first, we provide a brief overview of the drivers for initiatives to promote ethics in organizations. Second, we examine the reasons why ethics in the IT function in particular is of especial importance to establish and maintain an ethical culture in organizations. The paper concludes with our argument that an Ethics Officer in the IT function is needed to contribute to an ethical culture in an organization.Promoting an Ethical Culture in OrganizationsSo why is ethics so important to organizations today? In the United States, Chapter 8 Part B of the 2005 Federal Sentencing Guidelines entitled Remedying Harm From Criminal Conduct, and Effective Compliance and Ethics Programs (U.S. Sentencing Commission, 2005) necessitates an effective compliance and ethics program which should be \"designed to prevent and detect criminal conduct.\" It notes that this particular section is in response to section 805(a)(2)(5) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (U.S. House of Representatives, 2002) in which the U.S. Sentencing Commission is directed to \"review and amend, as appropriate, the guidelines and related policy statements to ensure that the guidelines that apply to organizations in this chapter 'are sufficient to deter and punish organizational criminal misconduct.'\" The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (or SOX for short) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 2002 as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom. Then President George W. Bush, who signed it into law, called the legislation \"the most far-reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of Franklin Delano Roosevelt\" (quoted in Bumiller, 2002). Sarbanes-Oxley also has implications not only with respect to U.S. organizations' IT function but also for non-U.S. businesses that are listed on U.S. stock exchanges (see for example O'Conor, 2005; Anand, 2008).Apart from U.S. legislation effecting organizations in and outside the U.S., there are also national legislation and/or regulation that pertain to organization's ethics (or lack thereof. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"21 1","pages":"27-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Elephant in the Server Room: Confronting the Need for an Ethics Officer in the IT Function\",\"authors\":\"S. Ponelis, J. Britz\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/JIE.21.1.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionOrganizations tend to view governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) as an overhead but a poor economy increases the likelihood of fraud, bribery, and corruption for individuals beyond the pressure of reaching often unrealistic organizational targets. Governance is the process by which policies are set and decision-making is executed; risk management ensures that important business processes and behaviors remain within the tolerances associated with those policies and decisions, going beyond that which creates an unacceptable potential for loss; and compliance is the process of adherence to policies and decisions. The massive public failures in GRC around the globe in recent years as evidenced by Enron, WorldCom, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers mean that organizations and employees are under increasing pressure to conduct their business operations not only effectively and profitably but also ethically-and be able to prove it to regulators, in the courts, to the press, and to the public. The risks associated with inappropriate ethical behavior have grown in number, likelihood, and severity. Ensuring ethical behavior among employees can gain organizations the goodwill and trust of their stakeholders and clients, avoid unfavorable publicity, and protect them and their employees from legal action. Although the importance of ethics in IT has been recognized for several decades in the IT field, to date very little consideration has been given to the need for an ethics specialized role dedicated to the IT function. At the same time, the broader culture within a country influences its business culture that in turn influences organizational cultures as well as its legislation, which impacts how ethical behavior in organizations is viewed and promoted.In this paper we argue for such a specialized role in IT in the form of an ethics officer using the U.S. as point of departure. To this end this paper is structured as follows: first, we provide a brief overview of the drivers for initiatives to promote ethics in organizations. Second, we examine the reasons why ethics in the IT function in particular is of especial importance to establish and maintain an ethical culture in organizations. The paper concludes with our argument that an Ethics Officer in the IT function is needed to contribute to an ethical culture in an organization.Promoting an Ethical Culture in OrganizationsSo why is ethics so important to organizations today? In the United States, Chapter 8 Part B of the 2005 Federal Sentencing Guidelines entitled Remedying Harm From Criminal Conduct, and Effective Compliance and Ethics Programs (U.S. Sentencing Commission, 2005) necessitates an effective compliance and ethics program which should be \\\"designed to prevent and detect criminal conduct.\\\" It notes that this particular section is in response to section 805(a)(2)(5) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (U.S. House of Representatives, 2002) in which the U.S. Sentencing Commission is directed to \\\"review and amend, as appropriate, the guidelines and related policy statements to ensure that the guidelines that apply to organizations in this chapter 'are sufficient to deter and punish organizational criminal misconduct.'\\\" The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (or SOX for short) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 2002 as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom. Then President George W. Bush, who signed it into law, called the legislation \\\"the most far-reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of Franklin Delano Roosevelt\\\" (quoted in Bumiller, 2002). Sarbanes-Oxley also has implications not only with respect to U.S. organizations' IT function but also for non-U.S. businesses that are listed on U.S. stock exchanges (see for example O'Conor, 2005; Anand, 2008).Apart from U.S. legislation effecting organizations in and outside the U.S., there are also national legislation and/or regulation that pertain to organization's ethics (or lack thereof. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"27-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.21.1.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.21.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

组织倾向于将治理、风险管理和遵从性(GRC)视为一项开销,但是糟糕的经济增加了欺诈、贿赂和个人腐败的可能性,超出了实现通常不现实的组织目标的压力。治理是制定政策和执行决策的过程;风险管理确保重要的业务流程和行为保持在与这些政策和决策相关的容忍范围内,而不是超出造成不可接受的潜在损失的范围;合规是遵守政策和决策的过程。近年来,安然、世通、房利美、房地美和雷曼兄弟等公司在全球范围内的大规模GRC公共失败表明,组织和员工面临着越来越大的压力,他们不仅要有效、盈利,还要遵守道德规范,并能够向监管机构、法庭、媒体和公众证明这一点。与不当道德行为相关的风险在数量、可能性和严重程度上都有所增加。确保员工的道德行为可以为组织赢得利益相关者和客户的善意和信任,避免不利的宣传,并保护他们和他们的员工免受法律诉讼。尽管道德在IT领域的重要性在几十年前就已经被认识到,但迄今为止,很少有人考虑到在IT功能中需要一个专门的道德角色。与此同时,一个国家内部更广泛的文化影响其商业文化,进而影响组织文化以及立法,从而影响如何看待和促进组织中的道德行为。在本文中,我们将以美国为出发点,以道德官员的形式论证IT中的这种专门角色。为此,本文的结构如下:首先,我们简要概述了在组织中促进道德的举措的驱动因素。其次,我们考察了IT职能中的道德对于在组织中建立和维持道德文化特别重要的原因。本文总结了我们的论点,即IT职能中的道德官员需要为组织中的道德文化做出贡献。在组织中推广道德文化为什么道德对今天的组织如此重要?在美国,2005年联邦量刑指南第8章B部分题为“补救犯罪行为造成的伤害,以及有效的合规和道德计划”(美国量刑委员会,2005年)要求制定有效的合规和道德计划,该计划应“旨在预防和发现犯罪行为”。它指出,这一特定条款是对2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(2002年美国众议院)第805(a)(2)(5)条的回应,其中美国量刑委员会被指示“酌情审查和修改指导方针和相关政策声明,以确保适用于本章组织的指导方针”足以阻止和惩罚组织的犯罪行为。萨班斯-奥克斯利法案(Sarbanes-Oxley Act,简称SOX)是2002年颁布的一项美国联邦法律,是对安然(Enron)和世通(WorldCom)等一系列重大企业和会计丑闻的回应。时任总统乔治·w·布什将其签署为法律,称该立法是“自富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福时代以来对美国商业实践最深远的改革”(引用自Bumiller, 2002)。萨班斯-奥克斯利法案不仅对美国组织的IT功能有影响,对非美国组织的IT功能也有影响。在美国证券交易所上市的企业(参见O’conor, 2005;Anand, 2008)。除了影响美国境内外组织的美国立法外,还有与组织道德(或缺乏道德)有关的国家立法和/或法规。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Elephant in the Server Room: Confronting the Need for an Ethics Officer in the IT Function
IntroductionOrganizations tend to view governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) as an overhead but a poor economy increases the likelihood of fraud, bribery, and corruption for individuals beyond the pressure of reaching often unrealistic organizational targets. Governance is the process by which policies are set and decision-making is executed; risk management ensures that important business processes and behaviors remain within the tolerances associated with those policies and decisions, going beyond that which creates an unacceptable potential for loss; and compliance is the process of adherence to policies and decisions. The massive public failures in GRC around the globe in recent years as evidenced by Enron, WorldCom, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers mean that organizations and employees are under increasing pressure to conduct their business operations not only effectively and profitably but also ethically-and be able to prove it to regulators, in the courts, to the press, and to the public. The risks associated with inappropriate ethical behavior have grown in number, likelihood, and severity. Ensuring ethical behavior among employees can gain organizations the goodwill and trust of their stakeholders and clients, avoid unfavorable publicity, and protect them and their employees from legal action. Although the importance of ethics in IT has been recognized for several decades in the IT field, to date very little consideration has been given to the need for an ethics specialized role dedicated to the IT function. At the same time, the broader culture within a country influences its business culture that in turn influences organizational cultures as well as its legislation, which impacts how ethical behavior in organizations is viewed and promoted.In this paper we argue for such a specialized role in IT in the form of an ethics officer using the U.S. as point of departure. To this end this paper is structured as follows: first, we provide a brief overview of the drivers for initiatives to promote ethics in organizations. Second, we examine the reasons why ethics in the IT function in particular is of especial importance to establish and maintain an ethical culture in organizations. The paper concludes with our argument that an Ethics Officer in the IT function is needed to contribute to an ethical culture in an organization.Promoting an Ethical Culture in OrganizationsSo why is ethics so important to organizations today? In the United States, Chapter 8 Part B of the 2005 Federal Sentencing Guidelines entitled Remedying Harm From Criminal Conduct, and Effective Compliance and Ethics Programs (U.S. Sentencing Commission, 2005) necessitates an effective compliance and ethics program which should be "designed to prevent and detect criminal conduct." It notes that this particular section is in response to section 805(a)(2)(5) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (U.S. House of Representatives, 2002) in which the U.S. Sentencing Commission is directed to "review and amend, as appropriate, the guidelines and related policy statements to ensure that the guidelines that apply to organizations in this chapter 'are sufficient to deter and punish organizational criminal misconduct.'" The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (or SOX for short) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 2002 as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom. Then President George W. Bush, who signed it into law, called the legislation "the most far-reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of Franklin Delano Roosevelt" (quoted in Bumiller, 2002). Sarbanes-Oxley also has implications not only with respect to U.S. organizations' IT function but also for non-U.S. businesses that are listed on U.S. stock exchanges (see for example O'Conor, 2005; Anand, 2008).Apart from U.S. legislation effecting organizations in and outside the U.S., there are also national legislation and/or regulation that pertain to organization's ethics (or lack thereof. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1