后苏联革命与后革命话语:解释后玫瑰革命格鲁吉亚与后天鹅绒革命亚美尼亚的政治认同建构

Q2 Social Sciences Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.34135/sjps.200107
A. Terzyan
{"title":"后苏联革命与后革命话语:解释后玫瑰革命格鲁吉亚与后天鹅绒革命亚美尼亚的政治认同建构","authors":"A. Terzyan","doi":"10.34135/sjps.200107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2018 “Velvet Revolution” in Armenia has renewed scholarly interest in post-Soviet revolution studies. This paper explores the core narratives underlying post-Rose Revolution and post-Velvet Revolution identity construction in Georgian and Armenian political discourses. More specifically, it examines the core narratives employed by the Georgian and Armenian revolution leaders Mikheil Saakashvili and Nikol Pashinyan in constructing the political identities of “New Georgia” and “New Armenia.” The findings suggest that the core narratives dominating Saakashvili’s discourse on post-revolution Georgia are as follows: “democratic Georgia” and “laboratory of democratic reforms,” “stereotype breaker,” “European Georgia,” “peaceful Georgia,” “powerful Georgia” and “security contributor,” determined to homecoming to Europe. Pashinyan’s discourse has revolved around the notion of “proud Armenians,” who established “people’s government” capable of carrying out an “economic revolution.” In contrast to Saakashvili’s emphasis on escaping post-Soviet geopolitical space and gaining centrality in the EU-driven socio-political order, Pashinyan’s discourse does not suggest foreign policy U-turns. It concludes that while the 2003 “Rose Revolution” marked fundamental shifts in self-other conceptions within the Georgian political discourse, the post-revolution Armenian discourse has not experienced dramatic identity-driven transformations.","PeriodicalId":36889,"journal":{"name":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Soviet Revolutions and Post-Revolution Discourses: Explaining the Construction of Political Identities in Post-Rose Revolution Georgia and Post-Velvet Revolution Armenia\",\"authors\":\"A. Terzyan\",\"doi\":\"10.34135/sjps.200107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2018 “Velvet Revolution” in Armenia has renewed scholarly interest in post-Soviet revolution studies. This paper explores the core narratives underlying post-Rose Revolution and post-Velvet Revolution identity construction in Georgian and Armenian political discourses. More specifically, it examines the core narratives employed by the Georgian and Armenian revolution leaders Mikheil Saakashvili and Nikol Pashinyan in constructing the political identities of “New Georgia” and “New Armenia.” The findings suggest that the core narratives dominating Saakashvili’s discourse on post-revolution Georgia are as follows: “democratic Georgia” and “laboratory of democratic reforms,” “stereotype breaker,” “European Georgia,” “peaceful Georgia,” “powerful Georgia” and “security contributor,” determined to homecoming to Europe. Pashinyan’s discourse has revolved around the notion of “proud Armenians,” who established “people’s government” capable of carrying out an “economic revolution.” In contrast to Saakashvili’s emphasis on escaping post-Soviet geopolitical space and gaining centrality in the EU-driven socio-political order, Pashinyan’s discourse does not suggest foreign policy U-turns. It concludes that while the 2003 “Rose Revolution” marked fundamental shifts in self-other conceptions within the Georgian political discourse, the post-revolution Armenian discourse has not experienced dramatic identity-driven transformations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2018年亚美尼亚的“天鹅绒革命”重新燃起了对后苏联革命研究的学术兴趣。本文探讨了格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚政治话语中后玫瑰革命和后天鹅绒革命身份建构的核心叙事。更具体地说,它考察了格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚革命领导人米哈伊尔·萨卡什维利和尼科尔·帕希尼扬在构建“新格鲁吉亚”和“新亚美尼亚”政治身份时所采用的核心叙事。研究结果表明,萨卡什维利关于革命后格鲁吉亚的话语的核心叙述如下:“民主格鲁吉亚”和“民主改革实验室”、“打破刻板印象”、“欧洲格鲁吉亚”、“和平格鲁吉亚”、“强大格鲁吉亚”和“安全贡献者”,决心回归欧洲。帕希尼扬的论述围绕着“骄傲的亚美尼亚人”的概念展开,他们建立了能够实施“经济革命”的“人民政府”。与萨卡什维利强调逃离后苏联地缘政治空间并在欧盟驱动的社会政治秩序中获得中心地位相比,帕希尼扬的论述并不建议外交政策的180度大转弯。它的结论是,虽然2003年的“玫瑰革命”标志着格鲁吉亚政治话语中自我-他者概念的根本转变,但革命后的亚美尼亚话语并没有经历戏剧性的身份驱动转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-Soviet Revolutions and Post-Revolution Discourses: Explaining the Construction of Political Identities in Post-Rose Revolution Georgia and Post-Velvet Revolution Armenia
The 2018 “Velvet Revolution” in Armenia has renewed scholarly interest in post-Soviet revolution studies. This paper explores the core narratives underlying post-Rose Revolution and post-Velvet Revolution identity construction in Georgian and Armenian political discourses. More specifically, it examines the core narratives employed by the Georgian and Armenian revolution leaders Mikheil Saakashvili and Nikol Pashinyan in constructing the political identities of “New Georgia” and “New Armenia.” The findings suggest that the core narratives dominating Saakashvili’s discourse on post-revolution Georgia are as follows: “democratic Georgia” and “laboratory of democratic reforms,” “stereotype breaker,” “European Georgia,” “peaceful Georgia,” “powerful Georgia” and “security contributor,” determined to homecoming to Europe. Pashinyan’s discourse has revolved around the notion of “proud Armenians,” who established “people’s government” capable of carrying out an “economic revolution.” In contrast to Saakashvili’s emphasis on escaping post-Soviet geopolitical space and gaining centrality in the EU-driven socio-political order, Pashinyan’s discourse does not suggest foreign policy U-turns. It concludes that while the 2003 “Rose Revolution” marked fundamental shifts in self-other conceptions within the Georgian political discourse, the post-revolution Armenian discourse has not experienced dramatic identity-driven transformations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Cooperation Between EU and NATO in Response to Hybrid Threats. A Retrospective Analysis from the Institutionalist Perspective Anti-Corruption Attitudes in Post-Communist Slovakia “Hellfire and Deviance” or Political Socialization? Populist Radical Right Parties and the Rhetoric of Emotions. The Slovak Case Study Lilleker, D.; Coman, I. A.; Gregor, M.; Novelli, E. eds. (2021). Political Communication and Covid-19. Governance and Rhetoric in Times of Crisis The Potential of Using Websites for Communication of Political Parties: The Case of Slovakia Before the 2020 Elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1