新生儿重症监护病房的安全文化:用安全态度问卷比较儿科研究生和护士

P. Kunde, K. Sreekumar, Silveira Mp
{"title":"新生儿重症监护病房的安全文化:用安全态度问卷比较儿科研究生和护士","authors":"P. Kunde, K. Sreekumar, Silveira Mp","doi":"10.35248/2167-0897.20.9.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evidence shows that neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICUs) experience a significantly higher potential for medication errors and adverse events rate than do patients in other wards of the hospital. This necessitates the assessment of the safety culture in the (NICU) which can help to identify areas that can lead to errors in the unit. Methods: This was cross sectional study done in the Neonatal unit, where the pediatric postgraduates resident doctors (PGs) and nurses were surveyed regarding the safety practices. The Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) which is validated and has good psychometric properties was used. Mean and Standard deviations for the six domains (job satisfaction, safety climate, teamwork climate, working conditions, perception of management and stress recognition) was analysed and unpaired t test was used to compare the means. Results: Total of 31 responses was obtained (12 PGs and 19 nurses). Overall mean scores for the SAQ were 70.2 for PGs and 63.8 for nurses, suggesting an overall negative response. Mean scores for PGs ranged from 63 (working condition) to 82.8 (stress recognition) and for nurses 48.6 (working conditions) to 82.8 (job satisfaction). There was statistically significant difference between the PGs and nurses in the domain of job satisfaction with p value of 0.03. Rest of the domains showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The scores suggest an overall negative response regarding safety culture in NICU. The variations among the Postgraduates and nurses suggest that we need customise the policies for both groups when we attempt to improve the safety culture in the unit while focussing on promoting teamwork.","PeriodicalId":73850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal biology","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety Culture in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Comparing the Pediatric Postgraduates and Nurses Using the Safety Attitude Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"P. Kunde, K. Sreekumar, Silveira Mp\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2167-0897.20.9.272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Evidence shows that neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICUs) experience a significantly higher potential for medication errors and adverse events rate than do patients in other wards of the hospital. This necessitates the assessment of the safety culture in the (NICU) which can help to identify areas that can lead to errors in the unit. Methods: This was cross sectional study done in the Neonatal unit, where the pediatric postgraduates resident doctors (PGs) and nurses were surveyed regarding the safety practices. The Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) which is validated and has good psychometric properties was used. Mean and Standard deviations for the six domains (job satisfaction, safety climate, teamwork climate, working conditions, perception of management and stress recognition) was analysed and unpaired t test was used to compare the means. Results: Total of 31 responses was obtained (12 PGs and 19 nurses). Overall mean scores for the SAQ were 70.2 for PGs and 63.8 for nurses, suggesting an overall negative response. Mean scores for PGs ranged from 63 (working condition) to 82.8 (stress recognition) and for nurses 48.6 (working conditions) to 82.8 (job satisfaction). There was statistically significant difference between the PGs and nurses in the domain of job satisfaction with p value of 0.03. Rest of the domains showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The scores suggest an overall negative response regarding safety culture in NICU. The variations among the Postgraduates and nurses suggest that we need customise the policies for both groups when we attempt to improve the safety culture in the unit while focussing on promoting teamwork.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neonatal biology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neonatal biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0897.20.9.272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0897.20.9.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:有证据表明,新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的新生儿发生药物错误和不良事件的可能性明显高于医院其他病房的患者。这就需要对NICU的安全文化进行评估,这有助于确定可能导致该单位出现错误的区域。方法:这是一项在新生儿病房进行的横断面研究,对儿科研究生住院医生(pg)和护士进行了有关安全实践的调查。安全态度问卷(SAQ)经验证,具有良好的心理测量性能。分析了六个领域(工作满意度、安全气候、团队合作气候、工作条件、管理感知和压力识别)的均值和标准差,并使用非配对t检验来比较均值。结果:共获得31份回复(pg 12例,护士19例)。护士的SAQ平均得分为70.2分,护士的平均得分为63.8分,表明总体的负面反应。pg的平均得分从63分(工作条件)到82.8分(压力识别),护士的平均得分从48.6分(工作条件)到82.8分(工作满意度)。护生与护士在工作满意度方面差异有统计学意义,p值为0.03。其余各域无显著性差异。结论:得分表明NICU的安全文化总体上是负面的。研究生和护士之间的差异表明,当我们试图改善单位的安全文化时,我们需要为这两个群体定制政策,同时注重促进团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety Culture in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Comparing the Pediatric Postgraduates and Nurses Using the Safety Attitude Questionnaire
Background: Evidence shows that neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICUs) experience a significantly higher potential for medication errors and adverse events rate than do patients in other wards of the hospital. This necessitates the assessment of the safety culture in the (NICU) which can help to identify areas that can lead to errors in the unit. Methods: This was cross sectional study done in the Neonatal unit, where the pediatric postgraduates resident doctors (PGs) and nurses were surveyed regarding the safety practices. The Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) which is validated and has good psychometric properties was used. Mean and Standard deviations for the six domains (job satisfaction, safety climate, teamwork climate, working conditions, perception of management and stress recognition) was analysed and unpaired t test was used to compare the means. Results: Total of 31 responses was obtained (12 PGs and 19 nurses). Overall mean scores for the SAQ were 70.2 for PGs and 63.8 for nurses, suggesting an overall negative response. Mean scores for PGs ranged from 63 (working condition) to 82.8 (stress recognition) and for nurses 48.6 (working conditions) to 82.8 (job satisfaction). There was statistically significant difference between the PGs and nurses in the domain of job satisfaction with p value of 0.03. Rest of the domains showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The scores suggest an overall negative response regarding safety culture in NICU. The variations among the Postgraduates and nurses suggest that we need customise the policies for both groups when we attempt to improve the safety culture in the unit while focussing on promoting teamwork.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Routine Screening for Sickle Cell Disease during Pregnancy: Epidemiological and Haemoglobin Profile in Congo. Editorial on Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Neonatal: Levels of Neonatal Nursery Editorial on Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevus Diagnosis of Neonatal Bowel Obstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1