SPS模型:一个重要的算法,以减少时间和计算机内存所需的地质统计模拟

IF 1 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.30495/IJES.2021.680583
B. Sadeghi
{"title":"SPS模型:一个重要的算法,以减少时间和计算机内存所需的地质统计模拟","authors":"B. Sadeghi","doi":"10.30495/IJES.2021.680583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In geochemical anomaly classification, different mathematical-statistical models have been applied. The final classified map provides only one scenario. This model is not certain enough since every model provides several thresholds which are almost different from each other meaning dissimilarity and spatial uncertainty of the classified maps. Spatial uncertainty of the models could be quantified considering the difference between the associated geochemical scenarios simulated (called: ‘realizations’) by geostatistical simulation (GS) methods. However, the main problem with GS methods is that these methods are significantly time-consuming, and CPU- and memory-demanding. To improve such problems, in this research, the method of “scaling and projecting sample-locations (SPS)” is developed. Based on the SPS theory, first of all, the whole sample-locations were projected (centralized) and scaled into a box coordinated between (0,0) to (150,0) and (0,0) to (0,100), for example (they can be equal though), with the cell-size of 1 m2. Therefore, the time consumed and the memory demanded to generate a large number of realizations, for example, 1000 realizations based on the non-scaled/non-projected (NS/NP) and scaled/projected (S/P) sample locations per case-study were quantified. In this study, the turning bands simulation (TBSIM) were applied to geochemical datasets of three different case studies to take the area scales, regularity/irregularity and density of the samples into account. The comparison between NS/NP and S/P results statistically demonstrated the same results, however, the process and outputs of the S/P samples took a significantly shorter time and consumed a remarkably lower computer-memory. Therefore, experts are able to easily run this algorithm using any normal computer.","PeriodicalId":44351,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPS Model: a significant algorithm to reduce the time and computer memory required in geostatistical simulations\",\"authors\":\"B. Sadeghi\",\"doi\":\"10.30495/IJES.2021.680583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In geochemical anomaly classification, different mathematical-statistical models have been applied. The final classified map provides only one scenario. This model is not certain enough since every model provides several thresholds which are almost different from each other meaning dissimilarity and spatial uncertainty of the classified maps. Spatial uncertainty of the models could be quantified considering the difference between the associated geochemical scenarios simulated (called: ‘realizations’) by geostatistical simulation (GS) methods. However, the main problem with GS methods is that these methods are significantly time-consuming, and CPU- and memory-demanding. To improve such problems, in this research, the method of “scaling and projecting sample-locations (SPS)” is developed. Based on the SPS theory, first of all, the whole sample-locations were projected (centralized) and scaled into a box coordinated between (0,0) to (150,0) and (0,0) to (0,100), for example (they can be equal though), with the cell-size of 1 m2. Therefore, the time consumed and the memory demanded to generate a large number of realizations, for example, 1000 realizations based on the non-scaled/non-projected (NS/NP) and scaled/projected (S/P) sample locations per case-study were quantified. In this study, the turning bands simulation (TBSIM) were applied to geochemical datasets of three different case studies to take the area scales, regularity/irregularity and density of the samples into account. The comparison between NS/NP and S/P results statistically demonstrated the same results, however, the process and outputs of the S/P samples took a significantly shorter time and consumed a remarkably lower computer-memory. Therefore, experts are able to easily run this algorithm using any normal computer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30495/IJES.2021.680583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30495/IJES.2021.680583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在地球化学异常分类中,应用了不同的数理统计模型。最终的分类地图只提供了一种场景。由于每个模型提供了几个阈值,这些阈值几乎彼此不同,这意味着分类地图的不相似性和空间不确定性,因此该模型不够确定。考虑到地质统计模拟(GS)方法模拟的相关地球化学情景(称为“实现”)之间的差异,模型的空间不确定性可以量化。然而,GS方法的主要问题是这些方法非常耗时,并且需要CPU和内存。为了改善这一问题,本研究提出了“缩放和投影样本位置(SPS)”方法。基于SPS理论,首先,将整个样本位置投影(集中)并缩放成一个协调在(0,0)到(150,0)和(0,0)到(0,100)之间的盒子(尽管它们可以相等),单元大小为1 m2。因此,生成大量实现所需的时间和内存被量化,例如每个案例研究基于非缩放/非投影(NS/NP)和缩放/投影(S/P)样本位置的1000个实现。在本研究中,将旋转带模拟(TBSIM)应用于3个不同案例的地球化学数据集,考虑样品的面积尺度、不规则性和密度。NS/NP和S/P结果的比较在统计上显示了相同的结果,然而,S/P样本的处理和输出所需的时间明显更短,消耗的计算机内存也明显更低。因此,专家们可以很容易地在任何普通的计算机上运行这个算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPS Model: a significant algorithm to reduce the time and computer memory required in geostatistical simulations
In geochemical anomaly classification, different mathematical-statistical models have been applied. The final classified map provides only one scenario. This model is not certain enough since every model provides several thresholds which are almost different from each other meaning dissimilarity and spatial uncertainty of the classified maps. Spatial uncertainty of the models could be quantified considering the difference between the associated geochemical scenarios simulated (called: ‘realizations’) by geostatistical simulation (GS) methods. However, the main problem with GS methods is that these methods are significantly time-consuming, and CPU- and memory-demanding. To improve such problems, in this research, the method of “scaling and projecting sample-locations (SPS)” is developed. Based on the SPS theory, first of all, the whole sample-locations were projected (centralized) and scaled into a box coordinated between (0,0) to (150,0) and (0,0) to (0,100), for example (they can be equal though), with the cell-size of 1 m2. Therefore, the time consumed and the memory demanded to generate a large number of realizations, for example, 1000 realizations based on the non-scaled/non-projected (NS/NP) and scaled/projected (S/P) sample locations per case-study were quantified. In this study, the turning bands simulation (TBSIM) were applied to geochemical datasets of three different case studies to take the area scales, regularity/irregularity and density of the samples into account. The comparison between NS/NP and S/P results statistically demonstrated the same results, however, the process and outputs of the S/P samples took a significantly shorter time and consumed a remarkably lower computer-memory. Therefore, experts are able to easily run this algorithm using any normal computer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences
Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sedimentological and provenance analysis of the Cretaceous Moro formation Rakhi Gorge, Eastern Sulaiman Range, Pakistan Raman spectroscopy study of the secondary actinolite in gabbrodiorite intrusive rocks from Varan area, Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, Iran Identification of Geochemical Distribution of REEs Using Factor Analysis and Concentration-Number (C-N) Fractal Modeling in Granitoids, South of Varcheh 1:100000 Sheet Facies Analysis, Depositional Environments and Geochemistry of the Late Ladinian-Early Carnian Ashin Formation, (Central Iran) Determination of body waves quality factor in the NW Iran, with power spectrum analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1