专题讨论会:美洲生态系统的破坏

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Revista Chilena de Historia Natural Pub Date : 2020-02-17 DOI:10.4067/s0716-078x2004000300001
P. Marquet
{"title":"专题讨论会:美洲生态系统的破坏","authors":"P. Marquet","doi":"10.4067/s0716-078x2004000300001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the effects of human–inducedperturbations, “disruptions”, on ecosystemfunctions is essential to be able to designsustainable environmental practices for theprotection of biodiversity. It has been well-documented on all continents that Euro-American cultures have had severe anddeleterious effects upon biodiversity during thelast three centuries (Deloria 1996). Humanimpacts since New World colonisation haveaccelerated species extinctions and thedisruption and degradation of ecosystemsprocesses and services, many of which havealready been reduced to isolated fragments, andnumerous species and genetically distinctpopulations have been lost in the process. Infact, between one-third to one half of the landsurface have been transformed by human action(Vitousek et al. 1997) and is currently composedof what Brown et al. (2003) call “semi-naturalmatrix” or “...land neither intensively used forcities or agriculture nor set aside as naturalreserves.” Perhaps more disturbing are the lesswell-known and more subtle disruptions tofundamental ecosystem processes: theconsequences of which are yet to be seen.During this new millennium, the tragedy ofthe commons is likely to become morecommon, particularly in developing countrieswhere the pressures are both global and local.Under these circumstances, environmentalscientists face the challenge of providing theinformation upon which future social andenvironmental policy needs to be based. Thischallenge requires a careful scrutiny andexamination of scientific data, models andother available empirical evidence within aninterdisciplinary setting. Other critical tasksinclude: (1) the explicit consideration of theinteraction between science and society indeveloping sustainable initiatives (Bradshaw B namely the comparison ofNorth and South Americas.North and South American ecosystemsshare a long history of cultural and ecologicalinteractions and have sustained similartransformations and disruptions through humanimpacts. Both continents are subject to large-scale climatic drivers such as the ENSOphenomenon. To a certain extent, North andSouth America exist as mirror images of eachother in climatic and biological patterns. This isparticularly true for the western regions ofNorth and South America where similarprogressions of major ecosystems types exist,along and in similar geographic and geologicalsettings, respectively. Temperate areas in Northand South America share striking climaticsimilarities, notwithstanding theirbiogeographic, cultural and socioeconomicdifferences. For example, the analysis of globalcirculation models (Lauenroth et al. 2004)predict that under a scenario of an effectingdoubling of CO","PeriodicalId":21247,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Historia Natural","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SYMPOSIUM: ECOSYSTEM DISRUPTIONS IN THE AMERICAS\",\"authors\":\"P. Marquet\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0716-078x2004000300001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the effects of human–inducedperturbations, “disruptions”, on ecosystemfunctions is essential to be able to designsustainable environmental practices for theprotection of biodiversity. It has been well-documented on all continents that Euro-American cultures have had severe anddeleterious effects upon biodiversity during thelast three centuries (Deloria 1996). Humanimpacts since New World colonisation haveaccelerated species extinctions and thedisruption and degradation of ecosystemsprocesses and services, many of which havealready been reduced to isolated fragments, andnumerous species and genetically distinctpopulations have been lost in the process. Infact, between one-third to one half of the landsurface have been transformed by human action(Vitousek et al. 1997) and is currently composedof what Brown et al. (2003) call “semi-naturalmatrix” or “...land neither intensively used forcities or agriculture nor set aside as naturalreserves.” Perhaps more disturbing are the lesswell-known and more subtle disruptions tofundamental ecosystem processes: theconsequences of which are yet to be seen.During this new millennium, the tragedy ofthe commons is likely to become morecommon, particularly in developing countrieswhere the pressures are both global and local.Under these circumstances, environmentalscientists face the challenge of providing theinformation upon which future social andenvironmental policy needs to be based. Thischallenge requires a careful scrutiny andexamination of scientific data, models andother available empirical evidence within aninterdisciplinary setting. Other critical tasksinclude: (1) the explicit consideration of theinteraction between science and society indeveloping sustainable initiatives (Bradshaw B namely the comparison ofNorth and South Americas.North and South American ecosystemsshare a long history of cultural and ecologicalinteractions and have sustained similartransformations and disruptions through humanimpacts. Both continents are subject to large-scale climatic drivers such as the ENSOphenomenon. To a certain extent, North andSouth America exist as mirror images of eachother in climatic and biological patterns. This isparticularly true for the western regions ofNorth and South America where similarprogressions of major ecosystems types exist,along and in similar geographic and geologicalsettings, respectively. Temperate areas in Northand South America share striking climaticsimilarities, notwithstanding theirbiogeographic, cultural and socioeconomicdifferences. For example, the analysis of globalcirculation models (Lauenroth et al. 2004)predict that under a scenario of an effectingdoubling of CO\",\"PeriodicalId\":21247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Historia Natural\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Historia Natural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-078x2004000300001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Historia Natural","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-078x2004000300001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解人为干扰(“破坏”)对生态系统功能的影响,对于设计保护生物多样性的可持续环境实践至关重要。在过去的三个世纪里,欧美文化对生物多样性产生了严重而有害的影响,这在各大洲都有充分的证据。自新大陆殖民以来,人类的影响加速了物种灭绝,破坏和退化了生态系统过程和服务,其中许多已经减少到孤立的碎片,许多物种和遗传上独特的种群在此过程中消失了。事实上,三分之一到二分之一的陆地表面已经被人类活动所改变(Vitousek et al. 1997),目前由Brown et al.(2003)所称的“半自然矩阵”或“……土地既没有集中用于城市或农业,也没有作为自然保护区。”也许更令人不安的是对基本生态系统过程的不太为人所知和更微妙的破坏:其后果尚待观察。在这个新的千年里,公地悲剧可能会变得更加普遍,特别是在发展中国家,那里的压力是全球性和地方性的。在这种情况下,环境科学家面临的挑战是为未来的社会和环境政策提供所需的信息。这一挑战需要在跨学科的背景下仔细审查和检查科学数据、模型和其他可用的经验证据。其他关键任务包括:(1)明确考虑科学与社会在发展可持续举措中的相互作用(Bradshaw B,即南北美洲的比较)。北美和南美的生态系统有着悠久的文化和生态相互作用的历史,并在人类影响下经历了类似的转变和破坏。两个大陆都受到诸如enso现象等大规模气候驱动因素的影响。在某种程度上,北美和南美在气候和生物模式上互为镜像。在北美和南美的西部地区尤其如此,那里主要的生态系统类型分别沿着相似的地理和地质环境发展。北美和南美的温带地区有着惊人的气候相似之处,尽管它们在生物地理、文化和社会经济方面存在差异。例如,对全球环流模式的分析(Lauenroth et al. 2004)预测,在CO的效应加倍的情景下
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SYMPOSIUM: ECOSYSTEM DISRUPTIONS IN THE AMERICAS
Understanding the effects of human–inducedperturbations, “disruptions”, on ecosystemfunctions is essential to be able to designsustainable environmental practices for theprotection of biodiversity. It has been well-documented on all continents that Euro-American cultures have had severe anddeleterious effects upon biodiversity during thelast three centuries (Deloria 1996). Humanimpacts since New World colonisation haveaccelerated species extinctions and thedisruption and degradation of ecosystemsprocesses and services, many of which havealready been reduced to isolated fragments, andnumerous species and genetically distinctpopulations have been lost in the process. Infact, between one-third to one half of the landsurface have been transformed by human action(Vitousek et al. 1997) and is currently composedof what Brown et al. (2003) call “semi-naturalmatrix” or “...land neither intensively used forcities or agriculture nor set aside as naturalreserves.” Perhaps more disturbing are the lesswell-known and more subtle disruptions tofundamental ecosystem processes: theconsequences of which are yet to be seen.During this new millennium, the tragedy ofthe commons is likely to become morecommon, particularly in developing countrieswhere the pressures are both global and local.Under these circumstances, environmentalscientists face the challenge of providing theinformation upon which future social andenvironmental policy needs to be based. Thischallenge requires a careful scrutiny andexamination of scientific data, models andother available empirical evidence within aninterdisciplinary setting. Other critical tasksinclude: (1) the explicit consideration of theinteraction between science and society indeveloping sustainable initiatives (Bradshaw B namely the comparison ofNorth and South Americas.North and South American ecosystemsshare a long history of cultural and ecologicalinteractions and have sustained similartransformations and disruptions through humanimpacts. Both continents are subject to large-scale climatic drivers such as the ENSOphenomenon. To a certain extent, North andSouth America exist as mirror images of eachother in climatic and biological patterns. This isparticularly true for the western regions ofNorth and South America where similarprogressions of major ecosystems types exist,along and in similar geographic and geologicalsettings, respectively. Temperate areas in Northand South America share striking climaticsimilarities, notwithstanding theirbiogeographic, cultural and socioeconomicdifferences. For example, the analysis of globalcirculation models (Lauenroth et al. 2004)predict that under a scenario of an effectingdoubling of CO
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (RCHN) publishes original research dealing with past and present phenomena from organismic to higher levels of biological organization, considering both empirical and theoretical studies on all kinds of taxa and environments. The major areas covered by RCHN are: botany and zoology; physiological and behavioral ecology; population biology; community and ecosystem ecology; systematics, biogeography and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Unveiling emerging interdisciplinary research challenges in the highly threatened sclerophyllous forests of central Chile Genomics resources for the Rapa Nui (Eastern Island) spiny lobster Panulirus pascuensis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Achelata) Where is dinner? The spatiality of the trophic niche of terrestrial mammalian carnivores in Chile, a systematization for their conservation Unveiling emerging interdisciplinary research challenges in the highly threatened sclerophyllous forests of central Chile The iconographic evolution of Patagonian and Fuegian canids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1