天堂鸟的悖论:作为历史强化标志的持续杂交

IF 0.2 Q4 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Ideas in Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2015-08-04 DOI:10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N
Paul R. Martin
{"title":"天堂鸟的悖论:作为历史强化标志的持续杂交","authors":"Paul R. Martin","doi":"10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae) exhibit some of the most diverse color patterns and courtship displays among species. Paradoxically, birds-of-paradise hybridize more frequently than other birds, even hybridizing across species and genera with remarkably divergent color patterns. Hybridization among such distinctly colored species might suggest that reinforcement was unimportant for color pattern divergence because reinforcement favors trait divergence that reduces the likelihood of hybridization over time, and is expected to eliminate hybridization between species. Here I present an alternative view: that persistent but infrequent hybridization among species that differ markedly in prezygotic isolating traits, such as color pattern in birds, represents the signature of historical reinforcement, and occurs when (i) divergence in single traits can reduce, but not prevent, hybridization, (ii) trade-offs constrain the divergence of prezygotic isolating traits, and (iii) selection against hybrids is weak when hybrids are rare. Considering these factors, the paradox of the birds-of-paradise—where species with distinct prezygotic isolating traits are more likely to hybridize at low frequencies—is the expected outcome of reinforcement. Sexual selection by female choice could further intensify the effects of reinforcement, particularly if reinforcement directs sexual selection to different traits in hybridizing populations. This latter process could potentially explain the exceptional diversity of extravagant ornaments in the birds-of-paradise.","PeriodicalId":42755,"journal":{"name":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The paradox of the Birds-of-Paradise: persistent hybridization as a signature of historical reinforcement\",\"authors\":\"Paul R. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae) exhibit some of the most diverse color patterns and courtship displays among species. Paradoxically, birds-of-paradise hybridize more frequently than other birds, even hybridizing across species and genera with remarkably divergent color patterns. Hybridization among such distinctly colored species might suggest that reinforcement was unimportant for color pattern divergence because reinforcement favors trait divergence that reduces the likelihood of hybridization over time, and is expected to eliminate hybridization between species. Here I present an alternative view: that persistent but infrequent hybridization among species that differ markedly in prezygotic isolating traits, such as color pattern in birds, represents the signature of historical reinforcement, and occurs when (i) divergence in single traits can reduce, but not prevent, hybridization, (ii) trade-offs constrain the divergence of prezygotic isolating traits, and (iii) selection against hybrids is weak when hybrids are rare. Considering these factors, the paradox of the birds-of-paradise—where species with distinct prezygotic isolating traits are more likely to hybridize at low frequencies—is the expected outcome of reinforcement. Sexual selection by female choice could further intensify the effects of reinforcement, particularly if reinforcement directs sexual selection to different traits in hybridizing populations. This latter process could potentially explain the exceptional diversity of extravagant ornaments in the birds-of-paradise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4033/IEE.2015.8.10.N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

天堂鸟(Paradisaeidae)在物种中展示了一些最多样化的颜色图案和求爱方式。矛盾的是,天堂鸟的杂交比其他鸟类更频繁,甚至在颜色模式截然不同的物种和属之间杂交。这些颜色鲜明的物种之间的杂交可能表明,强化对颜色模式的差异并不重要,因为强化有利于性状差异,随着时间的推移,这种差异降低了杂交的可能性,并有望消除物种之间的杂交。在这里,我提出了另一种观点:在前合子分离性状(如鸟类的颜色图案)显著不同的物种之间持续但不频繁的杂交代表了历史强化的特征,并且发生在(I)单个性状的分歧可以减少但不能阻止杂交,(ii)权衡限制了前合子分离性状的分歧,以及(iii)当杂种稀少时,对杂种的选择很弱。考虑到这些因素,天堂鸟的悖论——具有明显的前合子分离特征的物种更有可能以低频率杂交——是强化的预期结果。雌性选择的性选择可以进一步加强强化的影响,特别是如果强化在杂交种群中指导性选择的不同特征。后一种过程可能解释了天堂鸟身上奢侈装饰的异常多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The paradox of the Birds-of-Paradise: persistent hybridization as a signature of historical reinforcement
The birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae) exhibit some of the most diverse color patterns and courtship displays among species. Paradoxically, birds-of-paradise hybridize more frequently than other birds, even hybridizing across species and genera with remarkably divergent color patterns. Hybridization among such distinctly colored species might suggest that reinforcement was unimportant for color pattern divergence because reinforcement favors trait divergence that reduces the likelihood of hybridization over time, and is expected to eliminate hybridization between species. Here I present an alternative view: that persistent but infrequent hybridization among species that differ markedly in prezygotic isolating traits, such as color pattern in birds, represents the signature of historical reinforcement, and occurs when (i) divergence in single traits can reduce, but not prevent, hybridization, (ii) trade-offs constrain the divergence of prezygotic isolating traits, and (iii) selection against hybrids is weak when hybrids are rare. Considering these factors, the paradox of the birds-of-paradise—where species with distinct prezygotic isolating traits are more likely to hybridize at low frequencies—is the expected outcome of reinforcement. Sexual selection by female choice could further intensify the effects of reinforcement, particularly if reinforcement directs sexual selection to different traits in hybridizing populations. This latter process could potentially explain the exceptional diversity of extravagant ornaments in the birds-of-paradise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond individual, population, and community: Considering information, cell number, and energy flux as fundamental dimensions of life across scales Eccrine Hydration Screen adaptation theory for humans Investing in publication: Researchers as "savage capitalists" Transformative choices towards a sustainable academic publishing system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1