澄清对比,承认过去,扩大焦点

Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.3819/CCBR.2019.140004
Jeffrey M. Pisklak, M. A. McDevitt, R. Dunn
{"title":"澄清对比,承认过去,扩大焦点","authors":"Jeffrey M. Pisklak, M. A. McDevitt, R. Dunn","doi":"10.3819/CCBR.2019.140004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary highlights, clarifies, and questions various historical and theoretical points in Thomas Zentall’s review “What Suboptimal Choice Tells Us About the Control of Behavior.” Particular attention is paid to what Zentall refers to as the “unskilled gambling” paradigm. We acknowledge additional contributions to the study of suboptimal choice and clarify some theoretical issues foundational to a behavioral approach. We also raise important questions about Zentall’s use of the concept of “contrast,” how it is related to previous contrast research, and how it fails to extend a very similar explanation that predates it.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clarifying Contrast, Acknowledging the Past, and Expanding the Focus\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Pisklak, M. A. McDevitt, R. Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.3819/CCBR.2019.140004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary highlights, clarifies, and questions various historical and theoretical points in Thomas Zentall’s review “What Suboptimal Choice Tells Us About the Control of Behavior.” Particular attention is paid to what Zentall refers to as the “unskilled gambling” paradigm. We acknowledge additional contributions to the study of suboptimal choice and clarify some theoretical issues foundational to a behavioral approach. We also raise important questions about Zentall’s use of the concept of “contrast,” how it is related to previous contrast research, and how it fails to extend a very similar explanation that predates it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2019.140004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2019.140004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇评论强调、澄清并质疑了Thomas Zentall的评论《次优选择告诉我们关于行为控制的什么》中的各种历史和理论观点。特别要注意的是Zentall所说的“不熟练的赌博”范式。我们承认对次优选择研究的额外贡献,并澄清了行为方法的一些基础理论问题。我们还提出了一些重要的问题,关于Zentall对“对比”概念的使用,它与之前的对比研究有什么关系,以及它如何未能扩展在它之前非常相似的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Clarifying Contrast, Acknowledging the Past, and Expanding the Focus
This commentary highlights, clarifies, and questions various historical and theoretical points in Thomas Zentall’s review “What Suboptimal Choice Tells Us About the Control of Behavior.” Particular attention is paid to what Zentall refers to as the “unskilled gambling” paradigm. We acknowledge additional contributions to the study of suboptimal choice and clarify some theoretical issues foundational to a behavioral approach. We also raise important questions about Zentall’s use of the concept of “contrast,” how it is related to previous contrast research, and how it fails to extend a very similar explanation that predates it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1