C - CAPM估计中的比索问题

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Quantitative Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3982/qe1478
Juan Carlos Parra-Alvarez, Olaf Posch, Andreas Schrimpf
{"title":"C - CAPM估计中的比索问题","authors":"Juan Carlos Parra-Alvarez, Olaf Posch, Andreas Schrimpf","doi":"10.3982/qe1478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that the consumption‐based capital asset pricing model (C‐CAPM) with low‐probability disaster risk rationalizes pricing errors. We find that implausible estimates of risk aversion and time preference are not puzzling if market participants expect a future catastrophic change in fundamentals, which just happens not to occur in the sample (a “peso problem”). A bias in structural parameter estimates emerges as a result of pricing errors in quiet times. While the bias essentially removes the pricing error in the simple models when risk‐free rates are constant, time‐variation may also generate large and persistent estimated pricing errors in simulated data. We also show analytically how the problem of biased estimates can be avoided in empirical research by resolving the misspecification in moment conditions.","PeriodicalId":46811,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peso problems in the estimation of the C‐CAPM\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Parra-Alvarez, Olaf Posch, Andreas Schrimpf\",\"doi\":\"10.3982/qe1478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper shows that the consumption‐based capital asset pricing model (C‐CAPM) with low‐probability disaster risk rationalizes pricing errors. We find that implausible estimates of risk aversion and time preference are not puzzling if market participants expect a future catastrophic change in fundamentals, which just happens not to occur in the sample (a “peso problem”). A bias in structural parameter estimates emerges as a result of pricing errors in quiet times. While the bias essentially removes the pricing error in the simple models when risk‐free rates are constant, time‐variation may also generate large and persistent estimated pricing errors in simulated data. We also show analytically how the problem of biased estimates can be avoided in empirical research by resolving the misspecification in moment conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1478\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文表明,考虑低概率灾害风险的基于消费的资本资产定价模型(C - CAPM)合理化了定价误差。我们发现,如果市场参与者预期未来基本面会发生灾难性变化(“比索问题”),那么对风险厌恶和时间偏好的难以置信的估计并不令人费解。由于安静时期的定价错误,结构参数估计出现偏差。虽然当无风险利率恒定时,偏差基本上消除了简单模型中的定价误差,但时间变化也可能在模拟数据中产生大而持久的估计定价误差。我们还分析地展示了如何通过解决力矩条件下的错误规范来避免实证研究中有偏估计的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peso problems in the estimation of the C‐CAPM
This paper shows that the consumption‐based capital asset pricing model (C‐CAPM) with low‐probability disaster risk rationalizes pricing errors. We find that implausible estimates of risk aversion and time preference are not puzzling if market participants expect a future catastrophic change in fundamentals, which just happens not to occur in the sample (a “peso problem”). A bias in structural parameter estimates emerges as a result of pricing errors in quiet times. While the bias essentially removes the pricing error in the simple models when risk‐free rates are constant, time‐variation may also generate large and persistent estimated pricing errors in simulated data. We also show analytically how the problem of biased estimates can be avoided in empirical research by resolving the misspecification in moment conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geometric methods for finite rational inattention Measuring trust in institutions and its causal effect A robust permutation test for subvector inference in linear regressions Difficulties in testing for capital overaccumulation Bootstrapping Laplace transforms of volatility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1