外伤性脊髓损伤后四肢瘫痪和截瘫患者的生活质量

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ppn.2020.101441
Justyna Frasuńska, B. Tarnacka, Piotr Wojdasiewicz
{"title":"外伤性脊髓损伤后四肢瘫痪和截瘫患者的生活质量","authors":"Justyna Frasuńska, B. Tarnacka, Piotr Wojdasiewicz","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2020.101441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study compares the quality of life (QOL) in tetra- and paraplegic patients over the first 3 years after injury. An addi- tional goal is to determine whether there is correlation between selected factors based on medical records, the WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality of Life – short version of the questionnaire), and the SIP68 (Sickness Impact Profile – short version of the questionnaire) scales and these groups of patients. Methods: A total of 72 patients with locomotor disability, following spinal cord injury (SCI), were involved in the study. Patients completed the WHOQOL-BREF and SIP68 scales. The comparative analysis between the paraplegic ( n = 33) and tetraplegic ( n = 39) group, and correlations between selected factors based on medical records and the above-mentioned scales was made. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the assessment of SIP68 subscales: the somatic autonomy score was higher in paraplegic patients and the social behavior and mobility range scores were higher in patients with tetraplegia. Correlations between total WHOQOL-BREF score and ability to concentrate, refraining from any recreational activity, lack of gait and no professional ac- tivity were noticed in tetraplegia patients. Statistical significance was observed in correlations between total WHOQOL-BREF score and inability to bathe and get dressed without assistance, doing the washing, shopping and reduced socializing in paraplegia patients. Conclusions: The presented differences in the assessment of QOL between both patient groups revealed the specific social, psycho- logical and physical needs of patients. This is necessary for the development of effective treatment, depending on the level of injury, which may enable a faster return to optimal QOL for SCI patients.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life in patients with tetraplegia and paraplegia after traumatic spinal cord injury\",\"authors\":\"Justyna Frasuńska, B. Tarnacka, Piotr Wojdasiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ppn.2020.101441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The study compares the quality of life (QOL) in tetra- and paraplegic patients over the first 3 years after injury. An addi- tional goal is to determine whether there is correlation between selected factors based on medical records, the WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality of Life – short version of the questionnaire), and the SIP68 (Sickness Impact Profile – short version of the questionnaire) scales and these groups of patients. Methods: A total of 72 patients with locomotor disability, following spinal cord injury (SCI), were involved in the study. Patients completed the WHOQOL-BREF and SIP68 scales. The comparative analysis between the paraplegic ( n = 33) and tetraplegic ( n = 39) group, and correlations between selected factors based on medical records and the above-mentioned scales was made. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the assessment of SIP68 subscales: the somatic autonomy score was higher in paraplegic patients and the social behavior and mobility range scores were higher in patients with tetraplegia. Correlations between total WHOQOL-BREF score and ability to concentrate, refraining from any recreational activity, lack of gait and no professional ac- tivity were noticed in tetraplegia patients. Statistical significance was observed in correlations between total WHOQOL-BREF score and inability to bathe and get dressed without assistance, doing the washing, shopping and reduced socializing in paraplegia patients. Conclusions: The presented differences in the assessment of QOL between both patient groups revealed the specific social, psycho- logical and physical needs of patients. This is necessary for the development of effective treatment, depending on the level of injury, which may enable a faster return to optimal QOL for SCI patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2020.101441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2020.101441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较四肢瘫痪和截瘫患者在受伤后3年内的生活质量(QOL)。另一个目标是确定基于医疗记录、WHOQOL-BREF(世界卫生组织生活质量-短版问卷)和SIP68(疾病影响概况-短版问卷)量表和这些患者群体的选定因素之间是否存在相关性。方法:对72例脊髓损伤(SCI)后运动障碍患者进行研究。患者完成WHOQOL-BREF和SIP68量表。将截瘫组(n = 33)与全瘫组(n = 39)进行对比分析,并根据病历选择因素与上述量表进行相关性分析。结果:两组在SIP68亚量表的评定中差异有统计学意义:截瘫患者的躯体自主得分较高,四肢瘫痪患者的社会行为和活动范围得分较高。在四肢瘫痪患者中,WHOQOL-BREF总分与注意力集中能力、避免任何娱乐活动、缺乏步态和无专业活动之间存在相关性。WHOQOL-BREF总分与截瘫患者在无人帮助下不能洗澡、不能穿衣、不能洗衣服、不能购物、不能参加社交活动之间存在统计学意义。结论:两组患者生活质量评价的差异反映了患者特定的社会、心理和生理需求。这对于开发有效的治疗方法是必要的,这取决于损伤的程度,这可能使SCI患者更快地恢复到最佳生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of life in patients with tetraplegia and paraplegia after traumatic spinal cord injury
Purpose: The study compares the quality of life (QOL) in tetra- and paraplegic patients over the first 3 years after injury. An addi- tional goal is to determine whether there is correlation between selected factors based on medical records, the WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality of Life – short version of the questionnaire), and the SIP68 (Sickness Impact Profile – short version of the questionnaire) scales and these groups of patients. Methods: A total of 72 patients with locomotor disability, following spinal cord injury (SCI), were involved in the study. Patients completed the WHOQOL-BREF and SIP68 scales. The comparative analysis between the paraplegic ( n = 33) and tetraplegic ( n = 39) group, and correlations between selected factors based on medical records and the above-mentioned scales was made. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the assessment of SIP68 subscales: the somatic autonomy score was higher in paraplegic patients and the social behavior and mobility range scores were higher in patients with tetraplegia. Correlations between total WHOQOL-BREF score and ability to concentrate, refraining from any recreational activity, lack of gait and no professional ac- tivity were noticed in tetraplegia patients. Statistical significance was observed in correlations between total WHOQOL-BREF score and inability to bathe and get dressed without assistance, doing the washing, shopping and reduced socializing in paraplegia patients. Conclusions: The presented differences in the assessment of QOL between both patient groups revealed the specific social, psycho- logical and physical needs of patients. This is necessary for the development of effective treatment, depending on the level of injury, which may enable a faster return to optimal QOL for SCI patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
期刊最新文献
The conceptual basis of addiction memory, allostasis and dual processes, and the classical therapy of addiction. Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions Pulmonary embolism masked by symptoms of mental disorders The COVID-19 pandemic: new challenges for the mental health protection system The Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale as an instrument for assessing quality – a psychometric evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1