经验主义作为法律有效性的标准:在阿尔夫·罗斯和赫伯特·哈特之间

Horácio Wanderlei Rodrigues, L. R. Heinen
{"title":"经验主义作为法律有效性的标准:在阿尔夫·罗斯和赫伯特·哈特之间","authors":"Horácio Wanderlei Rodrigues, L. R. Heinen","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N72P193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal positivism positions the law in the formal validity. However, the law theory also focuses on other aspects of empirical to understand the legal phenomenon, we seek such elements in the works of Herbert Hart and Alf Ross. To Hart the rule of recognition's content, that we can use to meet the validity of the right, should be measured empirically in each legal system and may also (but not necessarily) incorporate moral elements. Differently, the realistic Ross theory is independent of the validity criterion and he argues that the effectiveness is verifiable by the effective application of the law by legal authorities.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"37 1","pages":"193-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N72P193","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empiria como Critério de Vigência do Direito: entre Alf Ross e Herbert Hart\",\"authors\":\"Horácio Wanderlei Rodrigues, L. R. Heinen\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N72P193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal positivism positions the law in the formal validity. However, the law theory also focuses on other aspects of empirical to understand the legal phenomenon, we seek such elements in the works of Herbert Hart and Alf Ross. To Hart the rule of recognition's content, that we can use to meet the validity of the right, should be measured empirically in each legal system and may also (but not necessarily) incorporate moral elements. Differently, the realistic Ross theory is independent of the validity criterion and he argues that the effectiveness is verifiable by the effective application of the law by legal authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"193-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N72P193\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N72P193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N72P193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

法律实证主义将法律定位于形式效力。然而,法学理论也注重从经验的其他方面来理解法律现象,我们在赫伯特·哈特和阿尔夫·罗斯的著作中寻求这样的要素。对哈特来说,我们可以用来满足权利有效性的承认内容规则,应该在每个法律体系中以经验来衡量,也可以(但不一定)包含道德因素。与之不同的是,现实主义的罗斯理论独立于有效性标准,他认为有效性可以通过法律当局对法律的有效适用来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empiria como Critério de Vigência do Direito: entre Alf Ross e Herbert Hart
Legal positivism positions the law in the formal validity. However, the law theory also focuses on other aspects of empirical to understand the legal phenomenon, we seek such elements in the works of Herbert Hart and Alf Ross. To Hart the rule of recognition's content, that we can use to meet the validity of the right, should be measured empirically in each legal system and may also (but not necessarily) incorporate moral elements. Differently, the realistic Ross theory is independent of the validity criterion and he argues that the effectiveness is verifiable by the effective application of the law by legal authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Justice and equality for all? Proportional representation in Belgium and France (1883-1921) A interligação entre a Lei Anticorrupção e o Direito dos Desastres Controle de Integridade e Administração Pública: sinergias necessárias As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção Post-Modern Narratives and the Paradigm of Efficiency: participatory democracy on the yellow brick road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1