乌托邦大学:一位教师反思对未来SoTL的建议。

Krista D. Forrest
{"title":"乌托邦大学:一位教师反思对未来SoTL的建议。","authors":"Krista D. Forrest","doi":"10.46504/08201311fo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am fortunate. I work in a department where the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is actively pursued and has been for over 20 years. Colleagues have presented at several teaching conferences within the discipline of psychology, and many have published articles on subjects ranging from working with undergraduates in research partnerships to the effects of using different technologies in the classroom. In addition to departmental support, my small midwestern university’s promotion and tenure policy has a statement that specifically recognizes peer-reviewed SoTL as counting toward promotion and tenure. This statement includes a web link to the first Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Report, Rethinking What it Means to be a Scholar (Rice, 1990). 2 This does not mean the fight for SoTL has ceased on my campus. As stated by Hutchings, Huber, and Ciccone (2011), sometimes the battle is not with the university, but with individual departments that hold onto the notion that only discipline specific scholarship is worthy of praise. Although I often encouraged faculty who developed new pedagogical techniques to write about these experiences and submit manuscripts to relevant teaching journals in their discipline, they often replied, “Why would I do that, it won’t count?” and “It’s not real scholarship.” It appears the greater concern about the role of SoTL does not come from the university, or even the college, but often starts with each faculty member. One of the highlights of Hutchings et al. (2011) is the authors’ discussion of Utopia University. They describe a campus of the future where faculty members’ SoTL has gone on to change departments and as the departments changed, so did the institution. The goal at Utopia U is to assist students in becoming “expert learners” (p. 113). The University does this through first year seminars, capstone courses taken by juniors, and ongoing programs designed to help each student understand the learning process that best works for him or her. Faculty also strive to learn by conducting research in their own classes. These outcomes are then used in changing courses to best respond to current and even future students. Those same faculty feel encouraged to conduct this research because they know that, if published, it will count toward promotion and tenure. The administration at Utopia U is happy to financially support this work because they know that one way to guarantee the accreditation crucial to their existence is to have excellent, productive faculty who inspire their students to perform at their best. Hutchings et al. (2011) go on to make several recommendations for institutions to follow if they want to integrate SoTL into their climates. The goal of","PeriodicalId":30055,"journal":{"name":"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching","volume":"8 1","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utopia University: A Faculty Member Reflects on Recommendations for the Future of SoTL.\",\"authors\":\"Krista D. Forrest\",\"doi\":\"10.46504/08201311fo\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am fortunate. I work in a department where the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is actively pursued and has been for over 20 years. Colleagues have presented at several teaching conferences within the discipline of psychology, and many have published articles on subjects ranging from working with undergraduates in research partnerships to the effects of using different technologies in the classroom. In addition to departmental support, my small midwestern university’s promotion and tenure policy has a statement that specifically recognizes peer-reviewed SoTL as counting toward promotion and tenure. This statement includes a web link to the first Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Report, Rethinking What it Means to be a Scholar (Rice, 1990). 2 This does not mean the fight for SoTL has ceased on my campus. As stated by Hutchings, Huber, and Ciccone (2011), sometimes the battle is not with the university, but with individual departments that hold onto the notion that only discipline specific scholarship is worthy of praise. Although I often encouraged faculty who developed new pedagogical techniques to write about these experiences and submit manuscripts to relevant teaching journals in their discipline, they often replied, “Why would I do that, it won’t count?” and “It’s not real scholarship.” It appears the greater concern about the role of SoTL does not come from the university, or even the college, but often starts with each faculty member. One of the highlights of Hutchings et al. (2011) is the authors’ discussion of Utopia University. They describe a campus of the future where faculty members’ SoTL has gone on to change departments and as the departments changed, so did the institution. The goal at Utopia U is to assist students in becoming “expert learners” (p. 113). The University does this through first year seminars, capstone courses taken by juniors, and ongoing programs designed to help each student understand the learning process that best works for him or her. Faculty also strive to learn by conducting research in their own classes. These outcomes are then used in changing courses to best respond to current and even future students. Those same faculty feel encouraged to conduct this research because they know that, if published, it will count toward promotion and tenure. The administration at Utopia U is happy to financially support this work because they know that one way to guarantee the accreditation crucial to their existence is to have excellent, productive faculty who inspire their students to perform at their best. Hutchings et al. (2011) go on to make several recommendations for institutions to follow if they want to integrate SoTL into their climates. The goal of\",\"PeriodicalId\":30055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"73-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46504/08201311fo\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46504/08201311fo","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我很幸运。我在一个积极追求教与学奖学金(SoTL)的部门工作,已经有20多年了。他的同事们在心理学学科的几次教学会议上发表了演讲,许多人发表了从与本科生合作研究到在课堂上使用不同技术的影响等主题的文章。除了部门支持,我所在的中西部小大学的晋升和终身教职政策有一项声明,明确承认同行评议的SoTL是晋升和终身教职的重要因素。这份声明包含了卡内基基金会第一份教学进步报告的网络链接,《重新思考成为学者意味着什么》(Rice, 1990)。这并不意味着在我的校园里,争取同性恋的斗争已经停止。正如Hutchings、Huber和Ciccone(2011)所言,有时候,争论的焦点不是大学,而是个别院系,这些院系坚持认为只有特定学科的学术研究才值得赞扬。虽然我经常鼓励那些开发了新的教学技术的教师把这些经历写下来,并把手稿提交给他们学科的相关教学期刊,但他们经常回答说:“我为什么要这样做,这不算数吗?”和“这不是真正的学术。”似乎对SoTL角色的更大关注不是来自大学,甚至不是学院,而是经常从每个教员开始。Hutchings et al.(2011)的一个亮点是作者对乌托邦大学的讨论。他们描述了一个未来的校园,在那里,教职员工的SoTL将继续改变院系,随着院系的改变,学院也会随之改变。乌托邦大学的目标是帮助学生成为“专家学习者”(第113页)。这所大学通过第一年的研讨会、三年级学生参加的顶点课程以及旨在帮助每个学生了解最适合他或她的学习过程的持续课程来实现这一目标。教师们也努力通过在自己的课堂上进行研究来学习。然后,这些结果被用于改变课程,以最好地应对当前甚至未来的学生。同样是这些教师,他们感到受到鼓舞,进行这项研究,因为他们知道,如果发表,将有助于晋升和终身教职。乌托邦大学的管理人员很乐意在经济上支持这项工作,因为他们知道,保证对他们的存在至关重要的认证的一种方法是拥有优秀的,富有成效的教师,激励他们的学生发挥最佳水平。Hutchings等人(2011)继续提出了一些建议,供那些想要将SoTL融入其气候的机构遵循。的目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utopia University: A Faculty Member Reflects on Recommendations for the Future of SoTL.
I am fortunate. I work in a department where the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is actively pursued and has been for over 20 years. Colleagues have presented at several teaching conferences within the discipline of psychology, and many have published articles on subjects ranging from working with undergraduates in research partnerships to the effects of using different technologies in the classroom. In addition to departmental support, my small midwestern university’s promotion and tenure policy has a statement that specifically recognizes peer-reviewed SoTL as counting toward promotion and tenure. This statement includes a web link to the first Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Report, Rethinking What it Means to be a Scholar (Rice, 1990). 2 This does not mean the fight for SoTL has ceased on my campus. As stated by Hutchings, Huber, and Ciccone (2011), sometimes the battle is not with the university, but with individual departments that hold onto the notion that only discipline specific scholarship is worthy of praise. Although I often encouraged faculty who developed new pedagogical techniques to write about these experiences and submit manuscripts to relevant teaching journals in their discipline, they often replied, “Why would I do that, it won’t count?” and “It’s not real scholarship.” It appears the greater concern about the role of SoTL does not come from the university, or even the college, but often starts with each faculty member. One of the highlights of Hutchings et al. (2011) is the authors’ discussion of Utopia University. They describe a campus of the future where faculty members’ SoTL has gone on to change departments and as the departments changed, so did the institution. The goal at Utopia U is to assist students in becoming “expert learners” (p. 113). The University does this through first year seminars, capstone courses taken by juniors, and ongoing programs designed to help each student understand the learning process that best works for him or her. Faculty also strive to learn by conducting research in their own classes. These outcomes are then used in changing courses to best respond to current and even future students. Those same faculty feel encouraged to conduct this research because they know that, if published, it will count toward promotion and tenure. The administration at Utopia U is happy to financially support this work because they know that one way to guarantee the accreditation crucial to their existence is to have excellent, productive faculty who inspire their students to perform at their best. Hutchings et al. (2011) go on to make several recommendations for institutions to follow if they want to integrate SoTL into their climates. The goal of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Attaining an Undergraduate Certificate on Older Adults: Examining Qualitative Experiences of Students Developmental Relationships: An Examination into the Perceptions of Students on Their Relationships with Faculty Members Can We Please Rethink the Discussion Board? New Superheroes/Villain Characters for Teaching Engineering Materials Selection Asynchronous Online Discussion Forums: Effective Undergraduate and Graduate Course Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1