{"title":"拉斐罗·桑齐奥剧院","authors":"Bryoni Trezise","doi":"10.4324/9780203000977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Claudia Castellucci, Romeo Castellucci, Chiara Guidi, Joe Kelleher and Nicholas Ridout, The Theatre of Soctetas Raffaello Sanzio (London and New York: Routledge, 2007) In their introduction to The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio, Nicholas Ridout and Joe Kelleher explain what it is for writing to capture the terms of a theatrical project that places the spectator 'already in the archive, re-examining the state of the imprints' (12). As the first English-language book to contribute to the growing archive on this internationally feted Italian theatre company, The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio formally wrestles with the very spatio-temporal logics posed by the company's signature architectures of image: eviscerated bodies, a myth cut in half and made abject, peripatetic thuds spliced against the precision of an electronic bow and arrow, a child on stage, cooing alone. The images created by Societas Raffaello Sanzio are viscerally impossible - they leave us sweaty and tangled in our seats, having glimpsed the self, the world, the wound of hypermodernity, in all its rotten but tremulous complexity. The ability to articulate in language that which the company has been chasing in such raw mise-en-scene for over twenty years is a difficult task for any enthused spectator. For scholars of their work, it seems that no one angle is ever quite enough to get at what, exactly, their theatre is able to produce. To be already in the archive, re-examining the state of the imprints, is to be placed in a position of clinical observation. This archive - Societas Raffaello Sanzio's roaming four-year, city-based repertoire Tragedia Endogonidia - contains the rapidly fading imprints of the West's end-of-millennium atrocities. In Cesena (C.#01), a near-naked body lying in a gilded room is actually that of Carlo Guiliani, a young protester killed by police at the 2001 G8 summit. In the Berlin episode (B.#02), an unspeakable homage to the 'mute, tragic stature' (73) of Germany's revolutionary Ulrike Meinhof is envisaged in the figure of an anonymous, mourning mother masturbating desperately on the edge of her bed. As referents of recent histories, these images are less about staging specific events and more about naming a state of deep but impenetrable loss. As the company members explain, their work is about city, post-tragedy and erasure - a 'mim[ing] [of] the images of tragedy' in a context in which tragedy has become farce - where 'redemption, pathos and ethos are inaccessible' (30). Tragedia Endogonidia mourns the sanctity of tragedy as a formal code, forcing the spectator to enter a logic that inverts the European theatrical sensorium as well as the symbologies of the late capitalist West. Ridout and Kelleher have collaborated with founding company members Romeo Castellucci (director), Chiara Guidi (dramaturg and designer) and Claudia Castellucci (performer), to construct a monograph that is itself a restaging, an assemblage of critical essays, process logs, scriptural scores, artist discussions and archival documentation that grapples with the monumentalism of their practice. As editors, they make plain the complexity of such a manoeuvre, where 'gathering the remains of ... [Societas Raffaello Sanzio's] work and making these available for retrospective reflection' needs itself to replay the 'livid rhetoricality' deployed by the company's theatrical language (6, 7). While the task of Tragedia Endogonidia is to re-perceive the erased in the act of erasure, the task of the book is to animate this doubled moment of re-perception in writing. For an audience, the abstract affective state imposed by the Societas Raffaello Sanzio image forces a kind of liminal exorcism - our bodies are deeply engaged, but we don't know quite in what. In response to such a refusal of 'narrative or illustrative justification' (75), the rich textual assemblage collated by Ridout and Kelleher offers insight for those still stuck in the realm of not-knowing. …","PeriodicalId":42838,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Drama Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Theatre of Socìetas Raffaello Sanzio\",\"authors\":\"Bryoni Trezise\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203000977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Claudia Castellucci, Romeo Castellucci, Chiara Guidi, Joe Kelleher and Nicholas Ridout, The Theatre of Soctetas Raffaello Sanzio (London and New York: Routledge, 2007) In their introduction to The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio, Nicholas Ridout and Joe Kelleher explain what it is for writing to capture the terms of a theatrical project that places the spectator 'already in the archive, re-examining the state of the imprints' (12). As the first English-language book to contribute to the growing archive on this internationally feted Italian theatre company, The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio formally wrestles with the very spatio-temporal logics posed by the company's signature architectures of image: eviscerated bodies, a myth cut in half and made abject, peripatetic thuds spliced against the precision of an electronic bow and arrow, a child on stage, cooing alone. The images created by Societas Raffaello Sanzio are viscerally impossible - they leave us sweaty and tangled in our seats, having glimpsed the self, the world, the wound of hypermodernity, in all its rotten but tremulous complexity. The ability to articulate in language that which the company has been chasing in such raw mise-en-scene for over twenty years is a difficult task for any enthused spectator. For scholars of their work, it seems that no one angle is ever quite enough to get at what, exactly, their theatre is able to produce. To be already in the archive, re-examining the state of the imprints, is to be placed in a position of clinical observation. This archive - Societas Raffaello Sanzio's roaming four-year, city-based repertoire Tragedia Endogonidia - contains the rapidly fading imprints of the West's end-of-millennium atrocities. In Cesena (C.#01), a near-naked body lying in a gilded room is actually that of Carlo Guiliani, a young protester killed by police at the 2001 G8 summit. In the Berlin episode (B.#02), an unspeakable homage to the 'mute, tragic stature' (73) of Germany's revolutionary Ulrike Meinhof is envisaged in the figure of an anonymous, mourning mother masturbating desperately on the edge of her bed. As referents of recent histories, these images are less about staging specific events and more about naming a state of deep but impenetrable loss. As the company members explain, their work is about city, post-tragedy and erasure - a 'mim[ing] [of] the images of tragedy' in a context in which tragedy has become farce - where 'redemption, pathos and ethos are inaccessible' (30). Tragedia Endogonidia mourns the sanctity of tragedy as a formal code, forcing the spectator to enter a logic that inverts the European theatrical sensorium as well as the symbologies of the late capitalist West. Ridout and Kelleher have collaborated with founding company members Romeo Castellucci (director), Chiara Guidi (dramaturg and designer) and Claudia Castellucci (performer), to construct a monograph that is itself a restaging, an assemblage of critical essays, process logs, scriptural scores, artist discussions and archival documentation that grapples with the monumentalism of their practice. As editors, they make plain the complexity of such a manoeuvre, where 'gathering the remains of ... [Societas Raffaello Sanzio's] work and making these available for retrospective reflection' needs itself to replay the 'livid rhetoricality' deployed by the company's theatrical language (6, 7). While the task of Tragedia Endogonidia is to re-perceive the erased in the act of erasure, the task of the book is to animate this doubled moment of re-perception in writing. For an audience, the abstract affective state imposed by the Societas Raffaello Sanzio image forces a kind of liminal exorcism - our bodies are deeply engaged, but we don't know quite in what. In response to such a refusal of 'narrative or illustrative justification' (75), the rich textual assemblage collated by Ridout and Kelleher offers insight for those still stuck in the realm of not-knowing. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":42838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Drama Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Drama Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203000977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Drama Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203000977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
Claudia Castellucci, Romeo Castellucci, Chiara Guidi, Joe Kelleher和Nicholas Ridout, The Theatre of Soctetas Raffaello Sanzio(伦敦和纽约:Routledge出版社,2007)在他们对The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio的介绍中,Nicholas Ridout和Joe Kelleher解释了什么是写作来捕捉戏剧项目的条款,使观众“已经在档案中,重新审视印记的状态”(12)。作为第一本为这家享誉国际的意大利戏剧公司不断增长的档案做出贡献的英文书,《拉斐尔·桑齐奥社会剧院》正式地与该公司标志性的形象架构所构成的时空逻辑进行了斗争:被肢解的身体,被切成两半的悲惨神话,与电子弓和箭的精确相结合的流动的轰隆声,舞台上一个独自咕咕叫的孩子。《拉斐尔·桑齐奥社会》所创作的图像从本质上讲是不可能的——它们让我们在座位上汗流浃背,纠结在一起,瞥见了自我、世界、超现代性的伤口,在所有腐烂但令人颤抖的复杂性中。对于任何热情的观众来说,用语言表达的能力都是一项艰巨的任务,这是该公司20多年来一直在追求的原始场景。对于研究他们作品的学者来说,似乎没有任何一个角度足以确切地了解他们的剧院能够生产什么。已经在档案中,重新检查印迹的状态,就是处于临床观察的位置。这个档案——Societas Raffaello Sanzio漫游了四年,以城市为基础的剧目《悲剧》(tragedy Endogonidia)——包含了西方千年末暴行的迅速消退的印记。在切塞纳(c #01),躺在镀金房间里的一具近乎赤裸的尸体实际上是卡洛·古利安尼(Carlo Guiliani),他是一名年轻的抗议者,在2001年八国集团峰会上被警察杀害。在柏林那一集(B.#02)中,对德国革命家乌尔里克·迈因霍夫(Ulrike Meinhof)“沉默的、悲剧性的身形”(73)的一种难以言喻的敬意被设想成一个无名的、悲伤的母亲在她的床边绝望地手淫。作为近代历史的代表,这些图像与其说是在展示具体的事件,不如说是在描述一种深刻而又难以逾越的损失状态。正如该公司成员所解释的那样,他们的作品是关于城市、后悲剧和抹除——在悲剧已成为闹剧的背景下,“对悲剧形象的[模糊]”——在这种背景下,“救赎、悲情和精神是不可企及的”(30)。《悲剧》将悲剧的神圣性作为一种正式的准则来哀悼,迫使观众进入一种逻辑,这种逻辑颠覆了欧洲戏剧的感官,也颠覆了晚期资本主义西方的符号学。Ridout和Kelleher与公司创始成员Romeo Castellucci(导演)、Chiara Guidi(戏剧和设计师)和Claudia Castellucci(表演者)合作,构建了一部专著,它本身就是一个重新演绎,是评论性文章、过程日志、圣经乐谱、艺术家讨论和档案文件的集合,与他们实践的纪念性作斗争。作为编辑,他们清楚地说明了这种策略的复杂性,“收集……[Societas Raffaello Sanzio]的作品,并使这些作品可用于回顾性反思,需要自身重放该公司戏剧语言所部署的“苍白的修辞”(6,7)。《悲剧内质》的任务是在擦除行为中重新感知被擦除的东西,而这本书的任务是在写作中激活这种双重的重新感知时刻。对于观众来说,《拉法埃洛·桑齐奥社会》的形象所带来的抽象情感状态迫使他们产生了一种边缘性的驱魔——我们的身体被深深吸引住了,但我们不知道是什么。为了回应这种对“叙事或说明性论证”的拒绝(75),Ridout和Kelleher整理的丰富的文本集合为那些仍然困在未知领域的人提供了洞察力。…
Claudia Castellucci, Romeo Castellucci, Chiara Guidi, Joe Kelleher and Nicholas Ridout, The Theatre of Soctetas Raffaello Sanzio (London and New York: Routledge, 2007) In their introduction to The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio, Nicholas Ridout and Joe Kelleher explain what it is for writing to capture the terms of a theatrical project that places the spectator 'already in the archive, re-examining the state of the imprints' (12). As the first English-language book to contribute to the growing archive on this internationally feted Italian theatre company, The Theatre of Societas Raffaello Sanzio formally wrestles with the very spatio-temporal logics posed by the company's signature architectures of image: eviscerated bodies, a myth cut in half and made abject, peripatetic thuds spliced against the precision of an electronic bow and arrow, a child on stage, cooing alone. The images created by Societas Raffaello Sanzio are viscerally impossible - they leave us sweaty and tangled in our seats, having glimpsed the self, the world, the wound of hypermodernity, in all its rotten but tremulous complexity. The ability to articulate in language that which the company has been chasing in such raw mise-en-scene for over twenty years is a difficult task for any enthused spectator. For scholars of their work, it seems that no one angle is ever quite enough to get at what, exactly, their theatre is able to produce. To be already in the archive, re-examining the state of the imprints, is to be placed in a position of clinical observation. This archive - Societas Raffaello Sanzio's roaming four-year, city-based repertoire Tragedia Endogonidia - contains the rapidly fading imprints of the West's end-of-millennium atrocities. In Cesena (C.#01), a near-naked body lying in a gilded room is actually that of Carlo Guiliani, a young protester killed by police at the 2001 G8 summit. In the Berlin episode (B.#02), an unspeakable homage to the 'mute, tragic stature' (73) of Germany's revolutionary Ulrike Meinhof is envisaged in the figure of an anonymous, mourning mother masturbating desperately on the edge of her bed. As referents of recent histories, these images are less about staging specific events and more about naming a state of deep but impenetrable loss. As the company members explain, their work is about city, post-tragedy and erasure - a 'mim[ing] [of] the images of tragedy' in a context in which tragedy has become farce - where 'redemption, pathos and ethos are inaccessible' (30). Tragedia Endogonidia mourns the sanctity of tragedy as a formal code, forcing the spectator to enter a logic that inverts the European theatrical sensorium as well as the symbologies of the late capitalist West. Ridout and Kelleher have collaborated with founding company members Romeo Castellucci (director), Chiara Guidi (dramaturg and designer) and Claudia Castellucci (performer), to construct a monograph that is itself a restaging, an assemblage of critical essays, process logs, scriptural scores, artist discussions and archival documentation that grapples with the monumentalism of their practice. As editors, they make plain the complexity of such a manoeuvre, where 'gathering the remains of ... [Societas Raffaello Sanzio's] work and making these available for retrospective reflection' needs itself to replay the 'livid rhetoricality' deployed by the company's theatrical language (6, 7). While the task of Tragedia Endogonidia is to re-perceive the erased in the act of erasure, the task of the book is to animate this doubled moment of re-perception in writing. For an audience, the abstract affective state imposed by the Societas Raffaello Sanzio image forces a kind of liminal exorcism - our bodies are deeply engaged, but we don't know quite in what. In response to such a refusal of 'narrative or illustrative justification' (75), the rich textual assemblage collated by Ridout and Kelleher offers insight for those still stuck in the realm of not-knowing. …