酸蚀对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷表面的形态和化学影响?

Y. Maruo, G. Nishigawa, M. Irie, K. Yoshihara, T. Matsumoto, S. Minagi
{"title":"酸蚀对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷表面的形态和化学影响?","authors":"Y. Maruo, G. Nishigawa, M. Irie, K. Yoshihara, T. Matsumoto, S. Minagi","doi":"10.5301/jabfm.5000303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study evaluated the surface morphology, chemical composition and adhesiveness of lithium disilicate glass ceramic after acid etching with hydrofluoric acid or phosphoric acid. Methods Lithium disilicate glass ceramic specimens polished by 600-grit silicon carbide paper were subjected to one or a combination of these surface treatments: airborne particle abrasion with 50-μm alumina (AA), etching with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) or 36% phosphoric acid (Phos), and application of silane coupling agent (Si). Stainless steel rods of 3.6-mm diameter and 2.0-mm height were cemented onto treated ceramic surfaces with a self-adhesive resin cement (Clearfil SA Cement). Shear bond strengths between ceramic and cement were measured after 24-hour storage in 37°C distilled water. Results SEM images of AA revealed the formation of conventional microretentive grooves, but acid etching with HF or Phos produced a porous surface. Bond strengths of AA+HF+Si (28.1 ± 6.0 MPa), AA+Phos+Si (17.5 ± 4.1 MPa) and HF+Si (21.0 ± 3.0 MPa) were significantly greater than those of non-pretreated controls with Si (9.7 ± 3.7 MPa) and without Si (4.1 ± 2.4 MPa) (p<0.05). In addition, HF etching alone (26.2 ± 7.5 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength than AA alone (11.5 ± 4.0 MPa) (p<0.05). AA+HF, AA+Phos and HF showed cohesive failures. Conclusions Etching with HF or Phos yielded higher bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and self-adhesive resin cement without microcrack formation.","PeriodicalId":51074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics","volume":"15 1","pages":"100 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/jabfm.5000303","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Acid Etching Morphologically and Chemically Affect Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic Surfaces?\",\"authors\":\"Y. Maruo, G. Nishigawa, M. Irie, K. Yoshihara, T. Matsumoto, S. Minagi\",\"doi\":\"10.5301/jabfm.5000303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background This study evaluated the surface morphology, chemical composition and adhesiveness of lithium disilicate glass ceramic after acid etching with hydrofluoric acid or phosphoric acid. Methods Lithium disilicate glass ceramic specimens polished by 600-grit silicon carbide paper were subjected to one or a combination of these surface treatments: airborne particle abrasion with 50-μm alumina (AA), etching with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) or 36% phosphoric acid (Phos), and application of silane coupling agent (Si). Stainless steel rods of 3.6-mm diameter and 2.0-mm height were cemented onto treated ceramic surfaces with a self-adhesive resin cement (Clearfil SA Cement). Shear bond strengths between ceramic and cement were measured after 24-hour storage in 37°C distilled water. Results SEM images of AA revealed the formation of conventional microretentive grooves, but acid etching with HF or Phos produced a porous surface. Bond strengths of AA+HF+Si (28.1 ± 6.0 MPa), AA+Phos+Si (17.5 ± 4.1 MPa) and HF+Si (21.0 ± 3.0 MPa) were significantly greater than those of non-pretreated controls with Si (9.7 ± 3.7 MPa) and without Si (4.1 ± 2.4 MPa) (p<0.05). In addition, HF etching alone (26.2 ± 7.5 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength than AA alone (11.5 ± 4.0 MPa) (p<0.05). AA+HF, AA+Phos and HF showed cohesive failures. Conclusions Etching with HF or Phos yielded higher bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and self-adhesive resin cement without microcrack formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/jabfm.5000303\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

本研究对氢氟酸和磷酸刻蚀后的二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的表面形貌、化学成分和粘附性进行了研究。方法采用600磨粒碳化硅纸对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷试样进行50-μm氧化铝(AA)空气粒子磨蚀、5%氢氟酸(HF)或36%磷酸(Phos)蚀刻以及硅烷偶联剂(Si)的表面处理。用自粘树脂水泥(Clearfil SA cement)将直径3.6 mm、高度2.0 mm的不锈钢棒粘合在处理过的陶瓷表面上。在37°C蒸馏水中保存24小时后,测量陶瓷与水泥之间的剪切粘结强度。结果AA的SEM图像显示形成了常规的微保留槽,而用HF或Phos酸蚀则形成了多孔表面。AA+HF+Si(28.1±6.0 MPa)、AA+Phos+Si(17.5±4.1 MPa)和HF+Si(21.0±3.0 MPa)的结合强度均显著高于未预处理Si(9.7±3.7 MPa)和未预处理Si(4.1±2.4 MPa)的对照组(p<0.05)。此外,HF蚀刻单独(26.2±7.5 MPa)的结合强度显著高于AA单独(11.5±4.0 MPa) (p<0.05)。AA+HF、AA+Phos和HF均表现为内聚失败。结论用HF或Phos蚀刻可以提高二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷与自粘树脂水泥的粘结强度,且不会形成微裂纹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Acid Etching Morphologically and Chemically Affect Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic Surfaces?
Background This study evaluated the surface morphology, chemical composition and adhesiveness of lithium disilicate glass ceramic after acid etching with hydrofluoric acid or phosphoric acid. Methods Lithium disilicate glass ceramic specimens polished by 600-grit silicon carbide paper were subjected to one or a combination of these surface treatments: airborne particle abrasion with 50-μm alumina (AA), etching with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) or 36% phosphoric acid (Phos), and application of silane coupling agent (Si). Stainless steel rods of 3.6-mm diameter and 2.0-mm height were cemented onto treated ceramic surfaces with a self-adhesive resin cement (Clearfil SA Cement). Shear bond strengths between ceramic and cement were measured after 24-hour storage in 37°C distilled water. Results SEM images of AA revealed the formation of conventional microretentive grooves, but acid etching with HF or Phos produced a porous surface. Bond strengths of AA+HF+Si (28.1 ± 6.0 MPa), AA+Phos+Si (17.5 ± 4.1 MPa) and HF+Si (21.0 ± 3.0 MPa) were significantly greater than those of non-pretreated controls with Si (9.7 ± 3.7 MPa) and without Si (4.1 ± 2.4 MPa) (p<0.05). In addition, HF etching alone (26.2 ± 7.5 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength than AA alone (11.5 ± 4.0 MPa) (p<0.05). AA+HF, AA+Phos and HF showed cohesive failures. Conclusions Etching with HF or Phos yielded higher bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and self-adhesive resin cement without microcrack formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 生物-材料科学:生物材料
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 months
期刊最新文献
Flow investigation of second grade micropolar nanofluid with porous medium over an exponentially stretching sheet β-TCP/DCPD-PHBV (40%/60%): Biomaterial made from bioceramic and biopolymer for bone regeneration; investigation of intrinsic properties Cetylpyridinium chloride inhibits human breast tumor cells growth in a no-selective way The effects of several operative parameters on the grafting of selected grafting agents on a polyamide six (PA6) fiber surface A Copper nanoparticles-based polymeric spray coating: Nanoshield against Sars-Cov-2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1