英国巴士行业的勾结、掠夺和合并

IF 0.9 4区工程技术 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Economics and Policy Pub Date : 1990-09-01 DOI:10.4324/9780203979532-18

M. Beesley

{"title":"英国巴士行业的勾结、掠夺和合并","authors":"M. Beesley","doi":"10.4324/9780203979532-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collusion, predation and merger in buses should each be viewed as attempts by firms to restore and improve profits following deregulation in 1985. Their analysis by competition authorities should define the entry conditions which deregulation in 1985 exposed, and the changes since, including some raised barriers. Effective pro-competitive action depends on modifying these conditions. The analysis of predation and merger in buses performed by the Office of Fair Trading and the Monopolies and Mergers Commissions are assessed in this light. Some evidence linking the registration since 1985 of agreements in restraint of trade, denoting collusion, with greater than average entry, and other parameters, is presented. (Author/TRRL)","PeriodicalId":47475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Economics and Policy","volume":"24 1","pages":"191-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COLLUSION, PREDATION AND MERGER IN THE UK BUS INDUSTRY\",\"authors\":\"M. Beesley\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203979532-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collusion, predation and merger in buses should each be viewed as attempts by firms to restore and improve profits following deregulation in 1985. Their analysis by competition authorities should define the entry conditions which deregulation in 1985 exposed, and the changes since, including some raised barriers. Effective pro-competitive action depends on modifying these conditions. The analysis of predation and merger in buses performed by the Office of Fair Trading and the Monopolies and Mergers Commissions are assessed in this light. Some evidence linking the registration since 1985 of agreements in restraint of trade, denoting collusion, with greater than average entry, and other parameters, is presented. (Author/TRRL)\",\"PeriodicalId\":47475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"191-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979532-18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979532-18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

摘要

公共汽车行业的勾结、掠夺和合并都应被视为公司在1985年放松管制后恢复和提高利润的尝试。竞争管理机构的分析应该界定1985年放松管制所暴露的进入条件，以及此后的变化，包括一些提高的壁垒。有效的促进竞争的行动取决于修改这些条件。公平交易办公室和垄断和合并委员会对公共汽车的掠夺和合并进行了分析，并从这个角度进行了评估。一些证据表明，自1985年以来登记的限制贸易协定，表示勾结，大于平均进入，和其他参数。(作者/ TRRL)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

COLLUSION, PREDATION AND MERGER IN THE UK BUS INDUSTRY

Collusion, predation and merger in buses should each be viewed as attempts by firms to restore and improve profits following deregulation in 1985. Their analysis by competition authorities should define the entry conditions which deregulation in 1985 exposed, and the changes since, including some raised barriers. Effective pro-competitive action depends on modifying these conditions. The analysis of predation and merger in buses performed by the Office of Fair Trading and the Monopolies and Mergers Commissions are assessed in this light. Some evidence linking the registration since 1985 of agreements in restraint of trade, denoting collusion, with greater than average entry, and other parameters, is presented. (Author/TRRL)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Transport Economics and Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Transport, Economics and Policy (JTEP) was first published over 40 years ago and quickly established itself as an essential source of information and debate on the economics of transport and its interface with transport policy. Today it continues to provide a much-needed focus for this specific area of transport research a single, accessible resource of international articles which also reflect the diverse nature of the current field. JTEP meets the challenge of innovation and change, regularly publishing the latest policy developments and their impact across the world.