大屠杀与道德教育

Lawrence A. Blum
{"title":"大屠杀与道德教育","authors":"Lawrence A. Blum","doi":"10.4324/9781315126357-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F\"\"(\"1he belief that schoo~ hav.e a resp?nsibility t~ teach ~ values is a very old Idea m Amencan education. In recent years, however, the aims and methods of programs in moral education have become a subject of intense debate. Some critics believe that such programs distract schools from their essential academic mission. Religious conservatives, wary of curricula that they perceive as favoring moral relativism, insist that the teaching of values should be left to parents and religious institutions. Their distrust extends to classroom efforts to foster \"critical thinking II by inviting students to discuss their personal responses to texts and historical events. One of the most widely adopted and controversial approaches to moral education addresses the specific issues of prejudice, conformity, and individual responsibility. It does this by examining the rise of Nazism and its culmination in the Holocaust. Facing History and Ourselves, an organization created in 1976, has produced a curriculum and resource book and conducts workshops for teachers. Its materials are now offered, in some form, to 500,000 students mostly eighth and ninth graders each year. The program received an unexpected burst of attention last fall, when a political scientist who had criticized it for not presenting the \"Nazi point of view\" was named historian of the House of Representatives. Once her comments attracted public notice, Christina Jeffrey was abruptly dismissed. But her remarks provoked a spate of articles and letters in national publications concerning the teaching of the Holocaust. Most commentators spent little time refuting the charge that Facing History had fail.ed to aChi.eve \"balance or objectivity\" in its exploration of NaZIsm. Other, more significant questions about the program its assumptions and moral purposes engaged them instead. Was the Holocaust a \"unique\" event in human history? Is it legitimate to compare the Holoca~st to other historical crimes, such as those perpetrated m the Soviet Union in the 1930s, Cambodia in the 1970s, Rwanda and Bosnia in the 1990s? Should the Holocaust be used as a reference point for teaching children about racism and social injustice in general about scapegoating, intolerance, and prejudice that can occur in any society?","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Holocaust and Moral Education\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence A. Blum\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315126357-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"F\\\"\\\"(\\\"1he belief that schoo~ hav.e a resp?nsibility t~ teach ~ values is a very old Idea m Amencan education. In recent years, however, the aims and methods of programs in moral education have become a subject of intense debate. Some critics believe that such programs distract schools from their essential academic mission. Religious conservatives, wary of curricula that they perceive as favoring moral relativism, insist that the teaching of values should be left to parents and religious institutions. Their distrust extends to classroom efforts to foster \\\"critical thinking II by inviting students to discuss their personal responses to texts and historical events. One of the most widely adopted and controversial approaches to moral education addresses the specific issues of prejudice, conformity, and individual responsibility. It does this by examining the rise of Nazism and its culmination in the Holocaust. Facing History and Ourselves, an organization created in 1976, has produced a curriculum and resource book and conducts workshops for teachers. Its materials are now offered, in some form, to 500,000 students mostly eighth and ninth graders each year. The program received an unexpected burst of attention last fall, when a political scientist who had criticized it for not presenting the \\\"Nazi point of view\\\" was named historian of the House of Representatives. Once her comments attracted public notice, Christina Jeffrey was abruptly dismissed. But her remarks provoked a spate of articles and letters in national publications concerning the teaching of the Holocaust. Most commentators spent little time refuting the charge that Facing History had fail.ed to aChi.eve \\\"balance or objectivity\\\" in its exploration of NaZIsm. Other, more significant questions about the program its assumptions and moral purposes engaged them instead. Was the Holocaust a \\\"unique\\\" event in human history? Is it legitimate to compare the Holoca~st to other historical crimes, such as those perpetrated m the Soviet Union in the 1930s, Cambodia in the 1970s, Rwanda and Bosnia in the 1990s? Should the Holocaust be used as a reference point for teaching children about racism and social injustice in general about scapegoating, intolerance, and prejudice that can occur in any society?\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126357-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126357-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

(1)学校的信仰。你要发言吗?传授价值观是美国教育中一个非常古老的观念。然而,近年来,道德教育计划的目标和方法已经成为一个激烈争论的话题。一些批评人士认为,这样的项目分散了学校的基本学术使命。宗教保守派对他们认为倾向于道德相对主义的课程持谨慎态度,坚持认为价值观的教学应该留给父母和宗教机构。他们的不信任延伸到课堂上培养“批判性思维II”的努力,通过邀请学生讨论他们对文本和历史事件的个人反应。道德教育中最广泛采用和最具争议的方法之一是解决偏见、顺从和个人责任等具体问题。它通过考察纳粹主义的兴起及其在大屠杀中的高潮来做到这一点。1976年成立的“面对历史和我们自己”组织制作了课程和参考书,并为教师举办了讲习班。它的教材现在每年以某种形式提供给50万名学生,其中大部分是八年级和九年级的学生。去年秋天,一名曾批评该节目没有呈现“纳粹观点”的政治学家被任命为众议院历史学家,该节目意外地引起了人们的关注。当她的评论引起公众注意时,克里斯蒂娜·杰弗里突然被解雇了。但她的言论在国家出版物上引发了关于大屠杀教学的大量文章和信件。大多数评论家几乎没有花时间反驳《面对历史》失败的指控。我要去aChi。甚至“平衡或客观”在其对纳粹主义的探索中。其他更重要的问题,关于这个项目,它的假设和道德目的,反而吸引了他们。大屠杀是人类历史上“独一无二”的事件吗?将大屠杀与其他历史罪行进行比较是否合理,比如上世纪30年代在苏联、70年代在柬埔寨、90年代在卢旺达和波斯尼亚犯下的罪行?大屠杀是否应该作为一个参照点,向儿童讲授种族主义和一般的社会不公正,以及任何社会都可能出现的替罪羊、不容忍和偏见?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Holocaust and Moral Education
F""("1he belief that schoo~ hav.e a resp?nsibility t~ teach ~ values is a very old Idea m Amencan education. In recent years, however, the aims and methods of programs in moral education have become a subject of intense debate. Some critics believe that such programs distract schools from their essential academic mission. Religious conservatives, wary of curricula that they perceive as favoring moral relativism, insist that the teaching of values should be left to parents and religious institutions. Their distrust extends to classroom efforts to foster "critical thinking II by inviting students to discuss their personal responses to texts and historical events. One of the most widely adopted and controversial approaches to moral education addresses the specific issues of prejudice, conformity, and individual responsibility. It does this by examining the rise of Nazism and its culmination in the Holocaust. Facing History and Ourselves, an organization created in 1976, has produced a curriculum and resource book and conducts workshops for teachers. Its materials are now offered, in some form, to 500,000 students mostly eighth and ninth graders each year. The program received an unexpected burst of attention last fall, when a political scientist who had criticized it for not presenting the "Nazi point of view" was named historian of the House of Representatives. Once her comments attracted public notice, Christina Jeffrey was abruptly dismissed. But her remarks provoked a spate of articles and letters in national publications concerning the teaching of the Holocaust. Most commentators spent little time refuting the charge that Facing History had fail.ed to aChi.eve "balance or objectivity" in its exploration of NaZIsm. Other, more significant questions about the program its assumptions and moral purposes engaged them instead. Was the Holocaust a "unique" event in human history? Is it legitimate to compare the Holoca~st to other historical crimes, such as those perpetrated m the Soviet Union in the 1930s, Cambodia in the 1970s, Rwanda and Bosnia in the 1990s? Should the Holocaust be used as a reference point for teaching children about racism and social injustice in general about scapegoating, intolerance, and prejudice that can occur in any society?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Objectivity and Subjectivity in Theories of Well-Being Political Leadership and the Social Value of Privacy Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics Defining Scientific Integrity The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Repatriation of Refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1