年轻人的编辑、读者和物有所值

Q2 Arts and Humanities Victorian Popular Fictions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.46911/rqqu4030
Madeline B. Gangnes
{"title":"年轻人的编辑、读者和物有所值","authors":"Madeline B. Gangnes","doi":"10.46911/rqqu4030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our Young Folks Weekly Budget (1871–97) is among the longest-running Victorian periodicals designed for child readers. Beginning as a halfpenny weekly, it soon doubled its price to establish its format as a children’s story paper similar to The Boy’s Own Paper (1879–1939) and comparable children’s weeklies. Throughout its publication, Young Folks displays an explicit concern with value for money, balancing assertions of quality with a desire to maintain its price. This article explores some of the ways in which the paper’s editors built their community of readers, explained changes to the paper’s length, format, and price and incorporated reader contributions to promote circulation. Through an examination of interactions between “the Editor” (James Henderson’s editorial team) and readers of Young Folks, this article charts a concerted effort to keep readers persuaded that every change made to the paper was in service of value to the consumer. At a time when periodicals strove to satisfy readers’ appetites for high-quality content while also keeping prices low, Young Folks employed specific strategies to remain a penny weekly that adapted to significant changes in its readership for over two decades.","PeriodicalId":34865,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Popular Fictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor, Reader, and Value for Money in Young Folks\",\"authors\":\"Madeline B. Gangnes\",\"doi\":\"10.46911/rqqu4030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our Young Folks Weekly Budget (1871–97) is among the longest-running Victorian periodicals designed for child readers. Beginning as a halfpenny weekly, it soon doubled its price to establish its format as a children’s story paper similar to The Boy’s Own Paper (1879–1939) and comparable children’s weeklies. Throughout its publication, Young Folks displays an explicit concern with value for money, balancing assertions of quality with a desire to maintain its price. This article explores some of the ways in which the paper’s editors built their community of readers, explained changes to the paper’s length, format, and price and incorporated reader contributions to promote circulation. Through an examination of interactions between “the Editor” (James Henderson’s editorial team) and readers of Young Folks, this article charts a concerted effort to keep readers persuaded that every change made to the paper was in service of value to the consumer. At a time when periodicals strove to satisfy readers’ appetites for high-quality content while also keeping prices low, Young Folks employed specific strategies to remain a penny weekly that adapted to significant changes in its readership for over two decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victorian Popular Fictions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victorian Popular Fictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46911/rqqu4030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Popular Fictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46911/rqqu4030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的年轻人每周预算(1871-97)是维多利亚时代为儿童读者设计的历史最悠久的期刊之一。起初,它是一份半便士的周报,很快,它的价格翻了一番,成为一份儿童故事报纸,类似于《男孩自己的报纸》(1879-1939)和类似的儿童周刊。在整个出版过程中,Young Folks表现出了对物有所值的明确关注,平衡了质量的主张和保持价格的愿望。本文探讨了报纸编辑建立读者社区的一些方法,解释了报纸长度、格式和价格的变化,并结合读者的贡献来促进发行量。通过对“编辑”(詹姆斯·亨德森的编辑团队)和《年轻人》读者之间互动的考察,这篇文章描绘了一种协调一致的努力,让读者相信,对报纸的每一次改变都是为了给消费者带来价值。在期刊努力满足读者对高质量内容的需求,同时保持低价格的时代,《年轻人》采用了特定的策略,保持了一分钱周报的价格,并在20多年的时间里适应了读者群体的重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor, Reader, and Value for Money in Young Folks
Our Young Folks Weekly Budget (1871–97) is among the longest-running Victorian periodicals designed for child readers. Beginning as a halfpenny weekly, it soon doubled its price to establish its format as a children’s story paper similar to The Boy’s Own Paper (1879–1939) and comparable children’s weeklies. Throughout its publication, Young Folks displays an explicit concern with value for money, balancing assertions of quality with a desire to maintain its price. This article explores some of the ways in which the paper’s editors built their community of readers, explained changes to the paper’s length, format, and price and incorporated reader contributions to promote circulation. Through an examination of interactions between “the Editor” (James Henderson’s editorial team) and readers of Young Folks, this article charts a concerted effort to keep readers persuaded that every change made to the paper was in service of value to the consumer. At a time when periodicals strove to satisfy readers’ appetites for high-quality content while also keeping prices low, Young Folks employed specific strategies to remain a penny weekly that adapted to significant changes in its readership for over two decades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Victorian Popular Fictions
Victorian Popular Fictions Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Degenerative Doctoring: Coercion, Experimentation and Ethics in Arthur Machen’s Gothic Horror The Splendour of Decadence: The Moral Geography of the European South in Victorian Travelogues “To whom shall the outcast prostitute tell her tale!”: Endo/Exo-Writer Perspectives of Nineteenth-Century Sex Workers in Madeleine, An Autobiography and Mary Barton “The most accomplished liar in literature”? Uncovering Marie Corelli’s Hidden Early Life Interpreting Issues of Heredity and Inheritance in Holmesian Children through Criminal Anthropology and Degeneration Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1