发展伙伴对坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区地方一级卫生部门的支持

G. Frumence, J. Chebet, Jennifer A. Callaghan-Koru, I. Mosha, D. Chitama, J. Killewo, P. Winch
{"title":"发展伙伴对坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区地方一级卫生部门的支持","authors":"G. Frumence, J. Chebet, Jennifer A. Callaghan-Koru, I. Mosha, D. Chitama, J. Killewo, P. Winch","doi":"10.4314/THRB.V20I2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Tanzanian health sector receives large amounts of funding from multiple international development partners to support a broad range of population-health interventions. However, little is known about the partners’ level of commitment to sustain funding, and the implications of uncertainties created by these funding mechanisms.  This study had the following objectives: 1) To present a theoretical model for assessing funding commitments by health development partners in a specified region; 2) to describe development partner funding commitments against this framework, using a case study example of Morogoro Region, Tanzania; and 3) to discuss policy considerations using this framework for district, regional and national level. Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was used to assess funding commitments of health-related development partners in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. Using qualitative data, collected as part of an evaluation of maternal and child health programs in Morogoro Region, key informants from all development partners were interviewed and thematic analysis was conducted for the assessment.  Results: Our findings show that decisions made on where to commit and direct funds were based on recipient government and development partner priorities. These decisions were based on government directives, such as the need to provide health services to vulnerable populations; the need to contribute towards alleviation of disease burden and development partner interests, including humanitarian concerns. Poor coordination of partner organizations and their funding priorities may undermine benefits to target populations. This weakness poses a major challenge on development partner investments in health, leading to duplication of efforts and resulting in stagnant disease burden levels. Conclusion: Effective coordination mechanisms between all stakeholders at each level should be advocated to provide a forum to discuss interests and priorities, so as to harmonize them and facilitate the implementation of development partner funded activities in the recipient countries.","PeriodicalId":39815,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development partner support to the health sector at the local level in Morogoro region, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"G. Frumence, J. Chebet, Jennifer A. Callaghan-Koru, I. Mosha, D. Chitama, J. Killewo, P. Winch\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/THRB.V20I2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Tanzanian health sector receives large amounts of funding from multiple international development partners to support a broad range of population-health interventions. However, little is known about the partners’ level of commitment to sustain funding, and the implications of uncertainties created by these funding mechanisms.  This study had the following objectives: 1) To present a theoretical model for assessing funding commitments by health development partners in a specified region; 2) to describe development partner funding commitments against this framework, using a case study example of Morogoro Region, Tanzania; and 3) to discuss policy considerations using this framework for district, regional and national level. Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was used to assess funding commitments of health-related development partners in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. Using qualitative data, collected as part of an evaluation of maternal and child health programs in Morogoro Region, key informants from all development partners were interviewed and thematic analysis was conducted for the assessment.  Results: Our findings show that decisions made on where to commit and direct funds were based on recipient government and development partner priorities. These decisions were based on government directives, such as the need to provide health services to vulnerable populations; the need to contribute towards alleviation of disease burden and development partner interests, including humanitarian concerns. Poor coordination of partner organizations and their funding priorities may undermine benefits to target populations. This weakness poses a major challenge on development partner investments in health, leading to duplication of efforts and resulting in stagnant disease burden levels. Conclusion: Effective coordination mechanisms between all stakeholders at each level should be advocated to provide a forum to discuss interests and priorities, so as to harmonize them and facilitate the implementation of development partner funded activities in the recipient countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanzania Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanzania Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/THRB.V20I2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/THRB.V20I2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:坦桑尼亚卫生部门从多个国际发展伙伴那里获得大量资金,以支持广泛的人口保健干预措施。然而,对于合作伙伴对持续供资的承诺程度以及这些供资机制所造成的不确定性的影响,人们知之甚少。本研究有以下目标:1)提出一个评估特定区域卫生发展伙伴供资承诺的理论模型;2)以坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区为例,描述发展伙伴在这一框架下的资助承诺;3)讨论在地区、区域和国家层面使用该框架的政策考虑。方法:采用定性案例研究方法评估坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区卫生相关发展伙伴的供资承诺。利用作为莫罗戈罗地区妇幼保健方案评价的一部分收集的定性数据,对来自所有发展伙伴的关键线人进行了访谈,并对评估进行了专题分析。结果:我们的研究结果表明,在何处承诺和直接提供资金的决策是基于受援国政府和发展伙伴的优先事项。这些决定是根据政府的指示作出的,例如需要向弱势群体提供保健服务;需要为减轻疾病负担和发展伙伴的利益,包括人道主义关切作出贡献。伙伴组织及其供资优先事项协调不力可能会损害目标人群的利益。这一弱点对发展伙伴在卫生方面的投资构成重大挑战,导致工作重复,导致疾病负担水平停滞不前。结论:应提倡在各级所有利益攸关方之间建立有效的协调机制,提供一个讨论利益和优先事项的论坛,以协调它们,促进发展伙伴资助的活动在受援国的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development partner support to the health sector at the local level in Morogoro region, Tanzania
Background: The Tanzanian health sector receives large amounts of funding from multiple international development partners to support a broad range of population-health interventions. However, little is known about the partners’ level of commitment to sustain funding, and the implications of uncertainties created by these funding mechanisms.  This study had the following objectives: 1) To present a theoretical model for assessing funding commitments by health development partners in a specified region; 2) to describe development partner funding commitments against this framework, using a case study example of Morogoro Region, Tanzania; and 3) to discuss policy considerations using this framework for district, regional and national level. Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was used to assess funding commitments of health-related development partners in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. Using qualitative data, collected as part of an evaluation of maternal and child health programs in Morogoro Region, key informants from all development partners were interviewed and thematic analysis was conducted for the assessment.  Results: Our findings show that decisions made on where to commit and direct funds were based on recipient government and development partner priorities. These decisions were based on government directives, such as the need to provide health services to vulnerable populations; the need to contribute towards alleviation of disease burden and development partner interests, including humanitarian concerns. Poor coordination of partner organizations and their funding priorities may undermine benefits to target populations. This weakness poses a major challenge on development partner investments in health, leading to duplication of efforts and resulting in stagnant disease burden levels. Conclusion: Effective coordination mechanisms between all stakeholders at each level should be advocated to provide a forum to discuss interests and priorities, so as to harmonize them and facilitate the implementation of development partner funded activities in the recipient countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Tanzania Journal of Health Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Knowledge on the Risk Factors for Diabetic Foot Syndrome and Self-Foot Care Practices among Diabetic Patients at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Antimicrobial Resistance among neonates with neonatal Sepsis Morogoro Tanzania Risk factors of delayed developmental milestones among infants attending RCH clinics in Dodoma region. A cross-sectional studydoma region Nutritional Status Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Tanzania Factors Associated with Anthropometric Status of Primary School Children in Dodoma, Tanzaniaania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1