巴西坎波斯多jordao市Perdizes和Fojo子流域的形态计量学分析

Q3 Environmental Science Revista Ambiente e Agua Pub Date : 2012-12-26 DOI:10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.945
A. M. Santos, M. S. Targa, G. T. Batista, N. Dias
{"title":"巴西坎波斯多jordao市Perdizes和Fojo子流域的形态计量学分析","authors":"A. M. Santos, M. S. Targa, G. T. Batista, N. Dias","doi":"10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The State of Sao Paulo Water Resources Policy established, in 1991, the Integrated Water Resources Management System (SIGRHI) and defined the basic principles for water management, adopting the watershed as the basic unit for studies, integrated planning for sustainable development. This study characterized the morphology of sub-basins Fojo and Perdizes in the city of Campos do Jordao, SP. Morphometric analysis involved the characterization of geometric parameters, topography and drainage network, and the analysis of land use and land cover of the sub-basins. The morphometric characterization revealed that Perdizes sub-basin has an area of 12.70 km², a perimeter of 19.85 km, and a main channel length of 6.86 km, while Fojo sub-basin has a drainage area of 13.97 km ², a perimeter of 19.74 km, and a main channel length of 6.94 km. These results indicate similarities between the two sub-basins. The compactness coefficient (Kc) for Perdizes was 1.56 and for Fojo 1.41. These values associated with the respective form factors, F = 0.27 and F = 0.29, indicate that these sub-basins, under a normal precipitation regime are not susceptible to flooding. The results of these indices are consisted with the circularity index (CI) found: CI = 0.41 for Perdizes and CI = 0.45 for Fojo, respectively. As CI values found are far from one, they indicate that these sub-basins tend to have a more elongated shape and, therefore, lower flow concentration tendency. The results obtained for the maintenance coefficient indicate that in order to maintain the flow of each channel meter, Perdizes sub-basin needs 286.5 m² and Fojo sub-basin needs 243.9 m². Land cover and land use analysis revealed that among the four existing vegetation cover types, Forest is dominant in both sub-basins with 649 ha (51.1%) in Perdizes, and 608.8 ha (43.6%) in Fojo; Reforestation cover ranks second with similar areas in both sub-basins, Perdizes with 218 ha (17.2%) and Fojo with approximately 214 ha (15.3%). In terms of conservation, Fojo sub-basin can be considered better conserved with a smaller urban area, larger rangeland natural coverage area, and only slightly smaller forest coverage area than Perdizes.","PeriodicalId":38374,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ambiente e Agua","volume":"7 1","pages":"195-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análise morfométrica das sub-bacias hidrográficas Perdizes e Fojo no município de Campos do Jordão, SP, Brasil\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Santos, M. S. Targa, G. T. Batista, N. Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The State of Sao Paulo Water Resources Policy established, in 1991, the Integrated Water Resources Management System (SIGRHI) and defined the basic principles for water management, adopting the watershed as the basic unit for studies, integrated planning for sustainable development. This study characterized the morphology of sub-basins Fojo and Perdizes in the city of Campos do Jordao, SP. Morphometric analysis involved the characterization of geometric parameters, topography and drainage network, and the analysis of land use and land cover of the sub-basins. The morphometric characterization revealed that Perdizes sub-basin has an area of 12.70 km², a perimeter of 19.85 km, and a main channel length of 6.86 km, while Fojo sub-basin has a drainage area of 13.97 km ², a perimeter of 19.74 km, and a main channel length of 6.94 km. These results indicate similarities between the two sub-basins. The compactness coefficient (Kc) for Perdizes was 1.56 and for Fojo 1.41. These values associated with the respective form factors, F = 0.27 and F = 0.29, indicate that these sub-basins, under a normal precipitation regime are not susceptible to flooding. The results of these indices are consisted with the circularity index (CI) found: CI = 0.41 for Perdizes and CI = 0.45 for Fojo, respectively. As CI values found are far from one, they indicate that these sub-basins tend to have a more elongated shape and, therefore, lower flow concentration tendency. The results obtained for the maintenance coefficient indicate that in order to maintain the flow of each channel meter, Perdizes sub-basin needs 286.5 m² and Fojo sub-basin needs 243.9 m². Land cover and land use analysis revealed that among the four existing vegetation cover types, Forest is dominant in both sub-basins with 649 ha (51.1%) in Perdizes, and 608.8 ha (43.6%) in Fojo; Reforestation cover ranks second with similar areas in both sub-basins, Perdizes with 218 ha (17.2%) and Fojo with approximately 214 ha (15.3%). In terms of conservation, Fojo sub-basin can be considered better conserved with a smaller urban area, larger rangeland natural coverage area, and only slightly smaller forest coverage area than Perdizes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ambiente e Agua\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"195-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ambiente e Agua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ambiente e Agua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4136/AMBI-AGUA.945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

圣保罗州水资源政策于1991年建立了水资源综合管理系统(SIGRHI),并确定了水资源管理的基本原则,采用流域作为研究和可持续发展综合规划的基本单位。本文研究了SP. Campos do Jordao市Fojo和Perdizes两个子盆地的形态特征。形态计量学分析包括几何参数、地形和流域网络特征,以及子盆地的土地利用和土地覆盖分析。地貌特征表明,Perdizes子盆地面积12.70 km²,周长19.85 km,主河道长度6.86 km; Fojo子盆地流域面积13.97 km²,周长19.74 km,主河道长度6.94 km。这些结果表明两个子盆地具有相似性。Perdizes的密实系数(Kc)为1.56,Fojo的密实系数为1.41。这些值与F = 0.27和F = 0.29的形态因子相关,表明这些子流域在正常降水条件下不容易发生洪水。这些指数的结果与所发现的循环指数(CI)相一致:Perdizes的CI = 0.41, Fojo的CI = 0.45。由于所发现的CI值远小于1,表明这些子盆地的形状趋于拉长,因此水流集中倾向较低。维持系数计算结果表明,Perdizes子流域需要286.5 m²,Fojo子流域需要243.9 m²才能维持每米的流量。土地覆被和土地利用分析表明,在4种现有植被类型中,森林在两个子流域均占主导地位,Perdizes为649 ha (51.1%), Fojo为608.8 ha (43.6%);在这两个子流域中,再造林面积排名第二,Perdizes为218公顷(17.2%),Fojo约为214公顷(15.3%)。在保护方面,Fojo子流域的城市面积较小,牧场自然覆盖面积较大,森林覆盖面积略小于Perdizes,保护程度较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Análise morfométrica das sub-bacias hidrográficas Perdizes e Fojo no município de Campos do Jordão, SP, Brasil
The State of Sao Paulo Water Resources Policy established, in 1991, the Integrated Water Resources Management System (SIGRHI) and defined the basic principles for water management, adopting the watershed as the basic unit for studies, integrated planning for sustainable development. This study characterized the morphology of sub-basins Fojo and Perdizes in the city of Campos do Jordao, SP. Morphometric analysis involved the characterization of geometric parameters, topography and drainage network, and the analysis of land use and land cover of the sub-basins. The morphometric characterization revealed that Perdizes sub-basin has an area of 12.70 km², a perimeter of 19.85 km, and a main channel length of 6.86 km, while Fojo sub-basin has a drainage area of 13.97 km ², a perimeter of 19.74 km, and a main channel length of 6.94 km. These results indicate similarities between the two sub-basins. The compactness coefficient (Kc) for Perdizes was 1.56 and for Fojo 1.41. These values associated with the respective form factors, F = 0.27 and F = 0.29, indicate that these sub-basins, under a normal precipitation regime are not susceptible to flooding. The results of these indices are consisted with the circularity index (CI) found: CI = 0.41 for Perdizes and CI = 0.45 for Fojo, respectively. As CI values found are far from one, they indicate that these sub-basins tend to have a more elongated shape and, therefore, lower flow concentration tendency. The results obtained for the maintenance coefficient indicate that in order to maintain the flow of each channel meter, Perdizes sub-basin needs 286.5 m² and Fojo sub-basin needs 243.9 m². Land cover and land use analysis revealed that among the four existing vegetation cover types, Forest is dominant in both sub-basins with 649 ha (51.1%) in Perdizes, and 608.8 ha (43.6%) in Fojo; Reforestation cover ranks second with similar areas in both sub-basins, Perdizes with 218 ha (17.2%) and Fojo with approximately 214 ha (15.3%). In terms of conservation, Fojo sub-basin can be considered better conserved with a smaller urban area, larger rangeland natural coverage area, and only slightly smaller forest coverage area than Perdizes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Ambiente e Agua
Revista Ambiente e Agua Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Previsão probabilística de enchentes para uma pequena bacia hidrográfica do Pantanal Climatic zoning for eucalyptus cultivation through strategic decision analysis Sanitary quality of the rivers in the Communities of Manguinhos´ Territory, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Land use and its impacts on the water quality of the Cachoeirinha Invernada Watershed, Guarulhos (SP) Sustainable access to safe drinking water: fundamental human right in the international and national scene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1