版权、文化与当代争论:印度公平交易的法理分析

Q4 Social Sciences Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.56042/jipr.v28i3.713
Chelsea Sawlani
{"title":"版权、文化与当代争论:印度公平交易的法理分析","authors":"Chelsea Sawlani","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i3.713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technological developments continue to disrupt creative industries, they put to test our copyright doctrine. The recent litigation initiated against Sci-Hub and LibGen by three publishers raises complex questions permeating the Indian copyright regime. In this context, it is important to determine the values our copyright system serves and the standards of ‘fairness’ it demands to exempt certain infringements. This paper studies the Indian fair dealing jurisprudence from a theoretical standpoint to argue that it lacks a robust normative foundation. It first maps the prevalent theories of copyright and suggests that the cultural theory not only exposes gaps in the dominant incentive theory but also offers a more comprehensive understanding of copyright. It then analyses Indian fair dealing cases from this viewpoint. While the jurisprudence is largely inconsistent, analysis of two important cases reveals that while their outcome was desirable from a cultural theory perspective, their doctrine is insufficient to excuse certain socially-valuable infringements. Their emphasis on transformativeness coupled with an implicit bar on verbatim reproductions is critical. It is suggested that the Indian fair dealing jurisprudence is unfit to foster a just and attractive culture; one that strives to attain pluralistic values essential for the ‘good life’.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Copyright, Culture and Contemporary Debates: A Jurisprudential Analysis of Fair Dealing in India\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Sawlani\",\"doi\":\"10.56042/jipr.v28i3.713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As technological developments continue to disrupt creative industries, they put to test our copyright doctrine. The recent litigation initiated against Sci-Hub and LibGen by three publishers raises complex questions permeating the Indian copyright regime. In this context, it is important to determine the values our copyright system serves and the standards of ‘fairness’ it demands to exempt certain infringements. This paper studies the Indian fair dealing jurisprudence from a theoretical standpoint to argue that it lacks a robust normative foundation. It first maps the prevalent theories of copyright and suggests that the cultural theory not only exposes gaps in the dominant incentive theory but also offers a more comprehensive understanding of copyright. It then analyses Indian fair dealing cases from this viewpoint. While the jurisprudence is largely inconsistent, analysis of two important cases reveals that while their outcome was desirable from a cultural theory perspective, their doctrine is insufficient to excuse certain socially-valuable infringements. Their emphasis on transformativeness coupled with an implicit bar on verbatim reproductions is critical. It is suggested that the Indian fair dealing jurisprudence is unfit to foster a just and attractive culture; one that strives to attain pluralistic values essential for the ‘good life’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i3.713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i3.713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着科技的发展不断颠覆创意产业,我们的版权原则也受到了考验。最近,三家出版商对Sci-Hub和LibGen发起的诉讼,引发了渗透印度版权制度的复杂问题。在这种情况下,重要的是要确定我们的版权制度所服务的价值,以及它所要求的“公平”标准,以免除某些侵权行为。本文从理论的角度对印度公平交易法学进行了研究,认为印度公平交易法学缺乏坚实的规范基础。本文首先对流行的版权理论进行了梳理,并指出文化理论不仅暴露了主流激励理论的缺陷,而且提供了对版权更全面的理解。然后从这个角度分析印度的公平交易案例。虽然法理学在很大程度上是不一致的,但对两个重要案例的分析表明,尽管从文化理论的角度来看,它们的结果是可取的,但它们的理论不足以为某些具有社会价值的侵权行为开脱。他们对变革的强调加上对逐字复制的隐含限制是至关重要的。本文认为,印度的公平交易法理不适合培养一种公正而有吸引力的文化;一个努力实现“美好生活”所必需的多元价值观的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Copyright, Culture and Contemporary Debates: A Jurisprudential Analysis of Fair Dealing in India
As technological developments continue to disrupt creative industries, they put to test our copyright doctrine. The recent litigation initiated against Sci-Hub and LibGen by three publishers raises complex questions permeating the Indian copyright regime. In this context, it is important to determine the values our copyright system serves and the standards of ‘fairness’ it demands to exempt certain infringements. This paper studies the Indian fair dealing jurisprudence from a theoretical standpoint to argue that it lacks a robust normative foundation. It first maps the prevalent theories of copyright and suggests that the cultural theory not only exposes gaps in the dominant incentive theory but also offers a more comprehensive understanding of copyright. It then analyses Indian fair dealing cases from this viewpoint. While the jurisprudence is largely inconsistent, analysis of two important cases reveals that while their outcome was desirable from a cultural theory perspective, their doctrine is insufficient to excuse certain socially-valuable infringements. Their emphasis on transformativeness coupled with an implicit bar on verbatim reproductions is critical. It is suggested that the Indian fair dealing jurisprudence is unfit to foster a just and attractive culture; one that strives to attain pluralistic values essential for the ‘good life’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The Interplay between Contemporary Art and Copyright Law Ethics and IPR - Much Needed Legal Solutions for Tomorrow Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Third Decade of Twenty-First Century (2020–2023) — VI Economic Justification of Traditional knowledge with Insights from Identity Economics Pre-Grant Opposition: CSIR v Ms Hindustan Lever Limited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1