{"title":"新提出的以撒哈顿巴比伦铭文的时间顺序和构成日期","authors":"Jamie R. Novotny","doi":"10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Babylon Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, perhaps the best-known group of texts in the extant corpus this seventh-century Assyrian king, have for decades presented a real challenge in cracking the various levels of ideology imbedded in their contents, as well as the chronological order in which they were written. The latter issue is closely tied to the fact that several clay prisms inscribed with these texts are all dated by the formula šanat rēš šarrūti, “accession year.” This paper will argue that the intentional dating of the Babylon Inscriptions reflects historical reality and that Esarhaddon's did not deliberately falsify the dates of inscriptions. It will also closely examine the contents of the known texts in this small subcorpus of this Assyrian king's official inscriptions and suggest new dates of composition for each text (especially Babylon A and Babylon D), as well as a new chronological sequencing of the inscriptions. Lastly, this paper will present updated editions of Babylon G and Babylon F based on an old nonphysical join proposed by A. R. Millard and a new international join discovered by the author.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"67 1","pages":"145 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Proposed Chronological Sequence and Dates of Composition of Esarhaddon's Babylon Inscriptions\",\"authors\":\"Jamie R. Novotny\",\"doi\":\"10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Babylon Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, perhaps the best-known group of texts in the extant corpus this seventh-century Assyrian king, have for decades presented a real challenge in cracking the various levels of ideology imbedded in their contents, as well as the chronological order in which they were written. The latter issue is closely tied to the fact that several clay prisms inscribed with these texts are all dated by the formula šanat rēš šarrūti, “accession year.” This paper will argue that the intentional dating of the Babylon Inscriptions reflects historical reality and that Esarhaddon's did not deliberately falsify the dates of inscriptions. It will also closely examine the contents of the known texts in this small subcorpus of this Assyrian king's official inscriptions and suggest new dates of composition for each text (especially Babylon A and Babylon D), as well as a new chronological sequencing of the inscriptions. Lastly, this paper will present updated editions of Babylon G and Babylon F based on an old nonphysical join proposed by A. R. Millard and a new international join discovered by the author.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cuneiform Studies\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cuneiform Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
以撒哈顿的巴比伦铭文,也许是现存的语料库中最著名的一组文本,在破解其内容中嵌入的不同层次的意识形态以及它们写作的时间顺序方面,几十年来一直是一个真正的挑战。后一个问题与以下事实密切相关:几个刻有这些文本的粘土棱镜的日期都是用公式šanat rēš šarrūti表示的,即“加入年份”。本文将论证巴比伦铭文的故意定年反映了历史现实,以撒哈顿并没有故意篡改铭文的日期。它还将仔细检查这个亚述国王官方铭文的小子语料库中已知文本的内容,并建议每个文本的新创作日期(特别是巴比伦A和巴比伦D),以及铭文的新时间顺序。最后,本文将基于a . R. Millard提出的旧的非物理连接和作者发现的新的国际连接,给出巴比伦G和巴比伦F的更新版本。
New Proposed Chronological Sequence and Dates of Composition of Esarhaddon's Babylon Inscriptions
The Babylon Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, perhaps the best-known group of texts in the extant corpus this seventh-century Assyrian king, have for decades presented a real challenge in cracking the various levels of ideology imbedded in their contents, as well as the chronological order in which they were written. The latter issue is closely tied to the fact that several clay prisms inscribed with these texts are all dated by the formula šanat rēš šarrūti, “accession year.” This paper will argue that the intentional dating of the Babylon Inscriptions reflects historical reality and that Esarhaddon's did not deliberately falsify the dates of inscriptions. It will also closely examine the contents of the known texts in this small subcorpus of this Assyrian king's official inscriptions and suggest new dates of composition for each text (especially Babylon A and Babylon D), as well as a new chronological sequencing of the inscriptions. Lastly, this paper will present updated editions of Babylon G and Babylon F based on an old nonphysical join proposed by A. R. Millard and a new international join discovered by the author.