膀胱癌患者行根治性膀胱切除术后淋巴结切除的程度——一项多机构分析

S. Piotrowicz, S. Poletajew, S. Czarniecki, F. Kowalski, G. Nowak, M. Oszczudlowski, M. Sochaj, J. Dobruch, P. Radziszewski
{"title":"膀胱癌患者行根治性膀胱切除术后淋巴结切除的程度——一项多机构分析","authors":"S. Piotrowicz, S. Poletajew, S. Czarniecki, F. Kowalski, G. Nowak, M. Oszczudlowski, M. Sochaj, J. Dobruch, P. Radziszewski","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2016.902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lymph node dissection (LND) performed at radical cystectomy (RC) has therapeutic and staging significance. However, the extent of LND remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze surgical patterns and results of LND in a contemporary series of patients with bladder cancer. This is a retrospective analysis of 113 consecutive patients subjected to RC in seven urological centres in the year 2013. The mean age of the cohort was 66.6 years. There were 49 cases of organ confined and 64 cases of locally advanced disease. Study endpoints were: status and extent of LND, number of LNs removed, and number of positive LNs. LND was performed in 102 patients (90.3%). Detailed data on the anatomical extent of LND was available in 82 patients (80.4%). Limited (lLND) and extended LND (eLND) was performed in 68.3% (n = 56) and 31.7% (n = 26) of patients, respectively. Obturator fossa LNs were removed in 84.1%, external iliac in 72.0%, internal iliac in 40.2%, common iliac in 31.7%, and presacral in 15.9% of cases. The median number of LNs removed in the whole study cohort, in patients who underwent lLND, and eLND, was 8.5, 5, and 16.5, respectively. In 28 patients (27.5%), LN metastases were diagnosed, including 6 cases (12.5%) in the organ-confined cohort and 22 cases (34.4%) in the locally advanced disease cohort. LND is an integral part of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. However, in the majority of patients, the extent of the procedure was suboptimal, potentially negatively affecting the survival and adequacy of pathological staging.","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"69 1","pages":"323 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy – a multi-institutional analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Piotrowicz, S. Poletajew, S. Czarniecki, F. Kowalski, G. Nowak, M. Oszczudlowski, M. Sochaj, J. Dobruch, P. Radziszewski\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2016.902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lymph node dissection (LND) performed at radical cystectomy (RC) has therapeutic and staging significance. However, the extent of LND remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze surgical patterns and results of LND in a contemporary series of patients with bladder cancer. This is a retrospective analysis of 113 consecutive patients subjected to RC in seven urological centres in the year 2013. The mean age of the cohort was 66.6 years. There were 49 cases of organ confined and 64 cases of locally advanced disease. Study endpoints were: status and extent of LND, number of LNs removed, and number of positive LNs. LND was performed in 102 patients (90.3%). Detailed data on the anatomical extent of LND was available in 82 patients (80.4%). Limited (lLND) and extended LND (eLND) was performed in 68.3% (n = 56) and 31.7% (n = 26) of patients, respectively. Obturator fossa LNs were removed in 84.1%, external iliac in 72.0%, internal iliac in 40.2%, common iliac in 31.7%, and presacral in 15.9% of cases. The median number of LNs removed in the whole study cohort, in patients who underwent lLND, and eLND, was 8.5, 5, and 16.5, respectively. In 28 patients (27.5%), LN metastases were diagnosed, including 6 cases (12.5%) in the organ-confined cohort and 22 cases (34.4%) in the locally advanced disease cohort. LND is an integral part of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. However, in the majority of patients, the extent of the procedure was suboptimal, potentially negatively affecting the survival and adequacy of pathological staging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia polska\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"323 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)中进行淋巴结清扫(LND)具有治疗和分期意义。然而,LND的范围仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是分析当代一系列膀胱癌患者的手术模式和LND的结果。这是一项对2013年在7个泌尿科中心连续接受RC的113例患者的回顾性分析。该队列的平均年龄为66.6岁。器官受限49例,局部晚期64例。研究终点为:LND的状态和程度、切除的LNs数量和阳性LNs数量。102例(90.3%)行LND。82例(80.4%)患者可获得LND解剖范围的详细数据。限制性(lLND)和延展性(eLND)分别在68.3% (n = 56)和31.7% (n = 26)的患者中进行。84.1%的病例切除了闭孔窝,72.0%的病例切除了外髂,40.2%的病例切除了内髂,31.7%的病例切除了普通髂,15.9%的病例切除了骶前。在整个研究队列中,在接受lLND和eLND的患者中,切除的中位数分别为8.5、5和16.5。28例(27.5%)患者被诊断为淋巴结转移,其中器官受限组6例(12.5%),局部晚期组22例(34.4%)。LND是膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术的重要组成部分。然而,在大多数患者中,手术的程度是次优的,可能对生存和病理分期的充分性产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy – a multi-institutional analysis
Lymph node dissection (LND) performed at radical cystectomy (RC) has therapeutic and staging significance. However, the extent of LND remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze surgical patterns and results of LND in a contemporary series of patients with bladder cancer. This is a retrospective analysis of 113 consecutive patients subjected to RC in seven urological centres in the year 2013. The mean age of the cohort was 66.6 years. There were 49 cases of organ confined and 64 cases of locally advanced disease. Study endpoints were: status and extent of LND, number of LNs removed, and number of positive LNs. LND was performed in 102 patients (90.3%). Detailed data on the anatomical extent of LND was available in 82 patients (80.4%). Limited (lLND) and extended LND (eLND) was performed in 68.3% (n = 56) and 31.7% (n = 26) of patients, respectively. Obturator fossa LNs were removed in 84.1%, external iliac in 72.0%, internal iliac in 40.2%, common iliac in 31.7%, and presacral in 15.9% of cases. The median number of LNs removed in the whole study cohort, in patients who underwent lLND, and eLND, was 8.5, 5, and 16.5, respectively. In 28 patients (27.5%), LN metastases were diagnosed, including 6 cases (12.5%) in the organ-confined cohort and 22 cases (34.4%) in the locally advanced disease cohort. LND is an integral part of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. However, in the majority of patients, the extent of the procedure was suboptimal, potentially negatively affecting the survival and adequacy of pathological staging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing a path for CEJU Location of ureteral access sheath in the ureter. Does it affect the fluid flow in different calyces? A new era and future of education: the impact of pandemic on online learning - a study from the European School of Urology. Spermatic vein thrombosis as a rare cause of testicular pain - review of the literature. Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1