认知压力源与COVID-19感染:一项纵向调查

Fred Ma, A. Hashmi, Charles Yu Liu, Heather Harris
{"title":"认知压力源与COVID-19感染:一项纵向调查","authors":"Fred Ma, A. Hashmi, Charles Yu Liu, Heather Harris","doi":"10.47275/2692-093x-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Survey the prevalence of various stress-related factors among a sample of the US adult population over the course of 1 year to compare rates among those who reported ever receiving a positive COVID-19 test vs those who never received a positive test. Highlight the potential impact of these factors upon cognitive functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A US census, age-balanced sample of adults was recruited through an online survey platform and participated in three waves of surveys. In each wave, roughly 3 months apart, participants, blinded to the survey sponsor, completed surveys with demographic information and questions regarding mental health, physical health, and environmental factors which have been linked to cognitive health. Participants were also asked whether they had ever received a positive COVID-19 test. Results: A total of 4,905 respondents were included in the first wave, 3,940 were included in the second wave, and 3,157 respondents were included in the third wave. In the third wave of the survey the largest age group was those 30 to 39 years of age (33.7% of respondents; n=1,063/3,157). The majority of respondents reported that they had never tested positive for COVID-19 (87.2%; n=2,610/3,157). The rate of those who reported ever receiving a positive COVID-19 test result was 17.3% (n=547/3,157). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report experiencing anxious symptoms and depressive symptoms between the second and third surveys vs those who never received a positive test result (70.5% vs 47.5% and 66.5% vs 37.3%, respectively). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report receiving a formal diagnosis from a healthcare provider for a sleep-related disorder (53.7% vs 19.1%). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report experiencing “more” or “much more” concern vs those without a positive test result since the second survey in the following areas: affording housing (49.5% vs 25.3%); employment or potential job loss (33.6% vs 20.0%); and affording necessities like food and medicine (44.8% vs 27.6%). Conclusions: Survey respondents who reported receiving a positive COVID-19 test result vs those who did not had a higher prevalence of stressors known to affect cognitive functioning, including anxiety, depression, sleep troubles, and concerns over issues recognized as social determinants of health. Routine neurocognitive assessment in clinical practice may be an important tool clinicians can use to track the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall cognitive health, allowing them to intervene as needed.","PeriodicalId":93129,"journal":{"name":"Neurological sciences and neurosurgery","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Stressors and COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Survey\",\"authors\":\"Fred Ma, A. Hashmi, Charles Yu Liu, Heather Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.47275/2692-093x-119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Survey the prevalence of various stress-related factors among a sample of the US adult population over the course of 1 year to compare rates among those who reported ever receiving a positive COVID-19 test vs those who never received a positive test. Highlight the potential impact of these factors upon cognitive functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A US census, age-balanced sample of adults was recruited through an online survey platform and participated in three waves of surveys. In each wave, roughly 3 months apart, participants, blinded to the survey sponsor, completed surveys with demographic information and questions regarding mental health, physical health, and environmental factors which have been linked to cognitive health. Participants were also asked whether they had ever received a positive COVID-19 test. Results: A total of 4,905 respondents were included in the first wave, 3,940 were included in the second wave, and 3,157 respondents were included in the third wave. In the third wave of the survey the largest age group was those 30 to 39 years of age (33.7% of respondents; n=1,063/3,157). The majority of respondents reported that they had never tested positive for COVID-19 (87.2%; n=2,610/3,157). The rate of those who reported ever receiving a positive COVID-19 test result was 17.3% (n=547/3,157). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report experiencing anxious symptoms and depressive symptoms between the second and third surveys vs those who never received a positive test result (70.5% vs 47.5% and 66.5% vs 37.3%, respectively). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report receiving a formal diagnosis from a healthcare provider for a sleep-related disorder (53.7% vs 19.1%). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report experiencing “more” or “much more” concern vs those without a positive test result since the second survey in the following areas: affording housing (49.5% vs 25.3%); employment or potential job loss (33.6% vs 20.0%); and affording necessities like food and medicine (44.8% vs 27.6%). Conclusions: Survey respondents who reported receiving a positive COVID-19 test result vs those who did not had a higher prevalence of stressors known to affect cognitive functioning, including anxiety, depression, sleep troubles, and concerns over issues recognized as social determinants of health. Routine neurocognitive assessment in clinical practice may be an important tool clinicians can use to track the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall cognitive health, allowing them to intervene as needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological sciences and neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological sciences and neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47275/2692-093x-119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological sciences and neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47275/2692-093x-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查1年期间美国成年人群样本中各种压力相关因素的患病率,以比较报告曾接受过COVID-19检测阳性的人与从未接受过检测阳性的人之间的比率。强调这些因素在COVID-19大流行期间对认知功能的潜在影响。方法:通过在线调查平台招募美国人口普查年龄平衡的成年人样本,参与三波调查。在每一波中,大约间隔3个月,参与者对调查发起人不知情,完成人口统计信息和有关心理健康、身体健康和与认知健康有关的环境因素的调查。参与者还被问及他们是否曾接受过COVID-19阳性检测。结果:第一波共纳入调查对象4905人,第二波3940人,第三波3157人。在第三轮调查中,最大的年龄组是30至39岁(占受访者的33.7%;n = 1063/3157)。大多数受访者报告说,他们从未检测出COVID-19呈阳性(87.2%;n = 2610/3157)。报告曾接受COVID-19检测结果阳性的比例为17.3% (n=547/3,157)。在第二次和第三次调查期间,报告检测结果呈阳性的受访者比从未收到检测结果呈阳性的受访者更有可能报告出现焦虑症状和抑郁症状(分别为70.5%对47.5%和66.5%对37.3%)。报告检测结果呈阳性的受访者更有可能报告从医疗保健提供者那里获得了睡眠相关疾病的正式诊断(53.7%对19.1%)。自第二次调查以来,测试结果呈阳性的受访者较没有测试结果呈阳性的受访者更有可能在以下方面感到“更多”或“更多”担忧:负担得起房屋(49.5%对25.3%);就业或可能失业(33.6% vs 20.0%);提供食品和药品等必需品(44.8%对27.6%)。结论:报告接受COVID-19检测结果阳性的受访者与未接受COVID-19检测结果阳性的受访者相比,已知影响认知功能的压力源的患病率更高,包括焦虑、抑郁、睡眠问题以及对被认为是健康社会决定因素的问题的担忧。临床实践中的常规神经认知评估可能是临床医生用来追踪COVID-19大流行对整体认知健康的长期影响的重要工具,使他们能够根据需要进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Stressors and COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Survey
Objectives: Survey the prevalence of various stress-related factors among a sample of the US adult population over the course of 1 year to compare rates among those who reported ever receiving a positive COVID-19 test vs those who never received a positive test. Highlight the potential impact of these factors upon cognitive functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A US census, age-balanced sample of adults was recruited through an online survey platform and participated in three waves of surveys. In each wave, roughly 3 months apart, participants, blinded to the survey sponsor, completed surveys with demographic information and questions regarding mental health, physical health, and environmental factors which have been linked to cognitive health. Participants were also asked whether they had ever received a positive COVID-19 test. Results: A total of 4,905 respondents were included in the first wave, 3,940 were included in the second wave, and 3,157 respondents were included in the third wave. In the third wave of the survey the largest age group was those 30 to 39 years of age (33.7% of respondents; n=1,063/3,157). The majority of respondents reported that they had never tested positive for COVID-19 (87.2%; n=2,610/3,157). The rate of those who reported ever receiving a positive COVID-19 test result was 17.3% (n=547/3,157). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report experiencing anxious symptoms and depressive symptoms between the second and third surveys vs those who never received a positive test result (70.5% vs 47.5% and 66.5% vs 37.3%, respectively). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report receiving a formal diagnosis from a healthcare provider for a sleep-related disorder (53.7% vs 19.1%). Respondents who reported a positive test result were more likely to report experiencing “more” or “much more” concern vs those without a positive test result since the second survey in the following areas: affording housing (49.5% vs 25.3%); employment or potential job loss (33.6% vs 20.0%); and affording necessities like food and medicine (44.8% vs 27.6%). Conclusions: Survey respondents who reported receiving a positive COVID-19 test result vs those who did not had a higher prevalence of stressors known to affect cognitive functioning, including anxiety, depression, sleep troubles, and concerns over issues recognized as social determinants of health. Routine neurocognitive assessment in clinical practice may be an important tool clinicians can use to track the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall cognitive health, allowing them to intervene as needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Could Psychedelics Treat Neuropathic Chronic Pain? Joubert Syndrome in 10-Year-Old with Renal Involvement: A Case Study The Risk of Withdrawal Seizures & Other Adverse Events in Newborns Associated with Levetiracetam Use as Monotherapy or in Combination Therapy for Seizures During Pregnancy - A Systematic Review Cognitive Stressors and COVID-19 Infection: A Longitudinal Survey Acute Ischemic Stroke and CT Cerebral Angiography: Management and Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1