舍曲林联合西地那非与舍曲林单药治疗无伴发性早泄的比较

Xiansheng Zhang, D. Tang, Jiajia Yang, K. Shi, Jingjing Gao, Z. Hao, Jun Zhou, C. Liang
{"title":"舍曲林联合西地那非与舍曲林单药治疗无伴发性早泄的比较","authors":"Xiansheng Zhang, D. Tang, Jiajia Yang, K. Shi, Jingjing Gao, Z. Hao, Jun Zhou, C. Liang","doi":"10.4172/2167-0250.1000117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of sertraline monotherapy and combination therapy with sertraline and sildenafil in the treatment of APE without concomitant diseases. \nMethods: The study was conducted in 120 outpatients diagnosed with APE but without concomitant diseases. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A was treated with 50 mg sertraline daily; group B was treated with 50 mg sertraline daily and 50 mg sildenafil as needed. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of the two therapies was performed after 4 and 8 weeks. Patient or partner reports of Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were assessed in this study. All the assessments were compared in the two groups after the treatment period. The efficacy was assessed by IELT, PEP and CGIC. On the other hand, safety was assessed by TEAEs. \nResults: 112 participants completed the study voluntarily. The two groups were similar regarding demographics. At the end of study period, both groups had significant improvements in IELT and PEP measures compared with pretreatment (P<0.001). Compared with group A, group B had significantly greater values of IELT (7.20 ± 2.93 vs. 5.04 ± 2.79), PEP measures, and CGIC (subjects reporting at least ‘better’: 58.2% vs. 35.8%) (P<0.05 for all). Adverse effects including headache, flushing, etc. were found in both groups, and the total incidence was higher in group B than group A (31.7% vs. 23.3%, respectively), but the difference was not significant. All the adverse effects were mild and tolerated. \nConclusion: Both sertraline monotherapy and combination therapy with sildenafil and sertraline were efficacious and safe in the treatment of APE without concomitant diseases. The combination therapy had a higher efficacy than sertraline monotherapy without more adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":15029,"journal":{"name":"Journal of andrology","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of Sertraline and Sildenafil versus Sertraline Monotherapy in the Treatment of Acquired Premature Ejaculation without Concomitant Diseases\",\"authors\":\"Xiansheng Zhang, D. Tang, Jiajia Yang, K. Shi, Jingjing Gao, Z. Hao, Jun Zhou, C. Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0250.1000117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of sertraline monotherapy and combination therapy with sertraline and sildenafil in the treatment of APE without concomitant diseases. \\nMethods: The study was conducted in 120 outpatients diagnosed with APE but without concomitant diseases. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A was treated with 50 mg sertraline daily; group B was treated with 50 mg sertraline daily and 50 mg sildenafil as needed. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of the two therapies was performed after 4 and 8 weeks. Patient or partner reports of Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were assessed in this study. All the assessments were compared in the two groups after the treatment period. The efficacy was assessed by IELT, PEP and CGIC. On the other hand, safety was assessed by TEAEs. \\nResults: 112 participants completed the study voluntarily. The two groups were similar regarding demographics. At the end of study period, both groups had significant improvements in IELT and PEP measures compared with pretreatment (P<0.001). Compared with group A, group B had significantly greater values of IELT (7.20 ± 2.93 vs. 5.04 ± 2.79), PEP measures, and CGIC (subjects reporting at least ‘better’: 58.2% vs. 35.8%) (P<0.05 for all). Adverse effects including headache, flushing, etc. were found in both groups, and the total incidence was higher in group B than group A (31.7% vs. 23.3%, respectively), but the difference was not significant. All the adverse effects were mild and tolerated. \\nConclusion: Both sertraline monotherapy and combination therapy with sildenafil and sertraline were efficacious and safe in the treatment of APE without concomitant diseases. The combination therapy had a higher efficacy than sertraline monotherapy without more adverse effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of andrology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0250.1000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0250.1000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:探讨舍曲林单药及舍曲林、西地那非联合治疗无伴发疾病的APE的疗效和安全性。方法:对120例确诊为APE但无伴发疾病的门诊患者进行研究。随机分为两组:A组给予舍曲林50 mg / d;B组每日给予舍曲林50 mg,根据需要给予西地那非50 mg。在4周和8周后对两种疗法的疗效和安全性进行评估。本研究评估了患者或伴侣的阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)、早泄概况(PEP)、临床总体印象变化(CGIC)和治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)。治疗结束后,比较两组患者的各项评分。采用雅思、PEP、CGIC评估疗效。另一方面,通过teae评估安全性。结果:112名参与者自愿完成了研究。这两个群体的人口统计数据相似。在研究期结束时,两组在雅思和PEP测量方面均较前处理有显著改善(P<0.001)。与A组相比,B组的雅思(7.20±2.93比5.04±2.79)、PEP测量和CGIC(报告至少“较好”的受试者:58.2%比35.8%)的值显著高于A组(均P<0.05)。两组患者均出现头痛、潮红等不良反应,且B组总发生率高于A组(分别为31.7%和23.3%),但差异无统计学意义。所有的不良反应都是轻微和耐受的。结论:舍曲林单药治疗及西地那非与舍曲林联用治疗APE均有效、安全,无伴发疾病。联合治疗的疗效高于舍曲林单药治疗,且不良反应较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combination of Sertraline and Sildenafil versus Sertraline Monotherapy in the Treatment of Acquired Premature Ejaculation without Concomitant Diseases
Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of sertraline monotherapy and combination therapy with sertraline and sildenafil in the treatment of APE without concomitant diseases. Methods: The study was conducted in 120 outpatients diagnosed with APE but without concomitant diseases. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A was treated with 50 mg sertraline daily; group B was treated with 50 mg sertraline daily and 50 mg sildenafil as needed. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of the two therapies was performed after 4 and 8 weeks. Patient or partner reports of Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were assessed in this study. All the assessments were compared in the two groups after the treatment period. The efficacy was assessed by IELT, PEP and CGIC. On the other hand, safety was assessed by TEAEs. Results: 112 participants completed the study voluntarily. The two groups were similar regarding demographics. At the end of study period, both groups had significant improvements in IELT and PEP measures compared with pretreatment (P<0.001). Compared with group A, group B had significantly greater values of IELT (7.20 ± 2.93 vs. 5.04 ± 2.79), PEP measures, and CGIC (subjects reporting at least ‘better’: 58.2% vs. 35.8%) (P<0.05 for all). Adverse effects including headache, flushing, etc. were found in both groups, and the total incidence was higher in group B than group A (31.7% vs. 23.3%, respectively), but the difference was not significant. All the adverse effects were mild and tolerated. Conclusion: Both sertraline monotherapy and combination therapy with sildenafil and sertraline were efficacious and safe in the treatment of APE without concomitant diseases. The combination therapy had a higher efficacy than sertraline monotherapy without more adverse effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of andrology
Journal of andrology 医学-男科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊最新文献
Penile Morphometrics and Erectile Function in Healthy Portuguese Men Sperm Quality and Seminal Biochemical Parameters in Infertile Men with and without Leukocytospermia Influence of Semen Parameters and Malondialdehyde on Infertile Males in Iraq Pure Egyptian Cattle Bulls Show both Individual Variation and Different Interaction with Extender in the Post-Thawing Sperm Parameters Evaluation of Xgene (R) , a Eurycoma longifolia Extract Enriched Penis CareCream, as a Novel Vehicle in Creating Penis Consciousness and Confidence in Keeping and Maintaining Erection for Penetrative Sex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1