{"title":"参与的许多方面","authors":"M. Antonsen, Kristine Ask, Henrik Karlstrøm","doi":"10.5324/NJSTS.V2I2.2143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We live in an age of public engagement. At least, one might get that impression from reading the literature of the fields of public understanding, engagement and participation (PES). Over time, the PES field has moved from understanding engagement as a matter of diffusing scientific knowledge in the wider society to emerging as a participatory concern crucially relying on lay input to even be considered good science (Horst and Michael 2011).","PeriodicalId":91145,"journal":{"name":"Nordic journal of science and technology studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The many faces of engagement\",\"authors\":\"M. Antonsen, Kristine Ask, Henrik Karlstrøm\",\"doi\":\"10.5324/NJSTS.V2I2.2143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We live in an age of public engagement. At least, one might get that impression from reading the literature of the fields of public understanding, engagement and participation (PES). Over time, the PES field has moved from understanding engagement as a matter of diffusing scientific knowledge in the wider society to emerging as a participatory concern crucially relying on lay input to even be considered good science (Horst and Michael 2011).\",\"PeriodicalId\":91145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic journal of science and technology studies\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"3-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic journal of science and technology studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5324/NJSTS.V2I2.2143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic journal of science and technology studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/NJSTS.V2I2.2143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We live in an age of public engagement. At least, one might get that impression from reading the literature of the fields of public understanding, engagement and participation (PES). Over time, the PES field has moved from understanding engagement as a matter of diffusing scientific knowledge in the wider society to emerging as a participatory concern crucially relying on lay input to even be considered good science (Horst and Michael 2011).