孟加拉国达卡第一波和第二波COVID-19大流行的流行病学比较:疑似病例的横断面研究

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5455/jabet.2022.d101
Islam, Israk, Jahan
{"title":"孟加拉国达卡第一波和第二波COVID-19大流行的流行病学比较:疑似病例的横断面研究","authors":"Islam, Israk, Jahan","doi":"10.5455/jabet.2022.d101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries have been seen two wave patterns of reported cases of coronavirus diseases. Still, a limited number of studies compared the epidemiological attributes of the first wave and second wave of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. This study was carried out to compare the epidemics of two waves in Bangladesh. This observational study data of suspected cases was collected from June 2020 to April 2021 from a local authorized diagnostic center. From June 27, 2020, to July 27, 2020, was considered as the first wave and from March 20, 2021, to April 20, 2021, was considered a second wave. This period was determined because of observing the highest number of positive cases during that period. Out of 21,359 cases, including 2429 (11.37%) individuals in the first wave and 4989 (23.36%) individuals in the second wave had RT-PCR test for disease confirmation. Among them, 315 people in the first wave and 630 in the second wave were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Male were more vernalized to the positive case, including 204 (64.8%) and 421 (66.8%) during the first and second waves, respectively. People under 41 found 56.2% positive cases during the first wave while it was 65.6% in the second wave. We also found 128 positive cases among international travelers. In conclusion, a large extent of different epidemiological attributes was found in the second wave compared to the first wave of the outbreaks.","PeriodicalId":36275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiological comparison of the first and second wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study among suspected cases.\",\"authors\":\"Islam, Israk, Jahan\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jabet.2022.d101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many countries have been seen two wave patterns of reported cases of coronavirus diseases. Still, a limited number of studies compared the epidemiological attributes of the first wave and second wave of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. This study was carried out to compare the epidemics of two waves in Bangladesh. This observational study data of suspected cases was collected from June 2020 to April 2021 from a local authorized diagnostic center. From June 27, 2020, to July 27, 2020, was considered as the first wave and from March 20, 2021, to April 20, 2021, was considered a second wave. This period was determined because of observing the highest number of positive cases during that period. Out of 21,359 cases, including 2429 (11.37%) individuals in the first wave and 4989 (23.36%) individuals in the second wave had RT-PCR test for disease confirmation. Among them, 315 people in the first wave and 630 in the second wave were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Male were more vernalized to the positive case, including 204 (64.8%) and 421 (66.8%) during the first and second waves, respectively. People under 41 found 56.2% positive cases during the first wave while it was 65.6% in the second wave. We also found 128 positive cases among international travelers. In conclusion, a large extent of different epidemiological attributes was found in the second wave compared to the first wave of the outbreaks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jabet.2022.d101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jabet.2022.d101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

许多国家报告的冠状病毒病例出现了两波模式。尽管如此,有限数量的研究比较了2019年第一波和第二波冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)爆发的流行病学特征。进行这项研究是为了比较孟加拉国两波流行。疑似病例的观察性研究数据于2020年6月至2021年4月从当地授权诊断中心收集。从2020年6月27日到2020年7月27日被认为是第一波,从2021年3月20日到2021年4月20日被认为是第二波。之所以确定这一时期,是因为在这一时期观察到的阳性病例数量最多。在21359例病例中,第一波2429例(11.37%),第二波4989例(23.36%)进行了RT-PCR确诊。其中,第一波315人、第二波630人的SARS-CoV-2 RNA阳性。阳性病例以男性春化为主,第一波和第二波分别有204例(64.8%)和421例(66.8%)。41岁以下人群在第一波中阳性病例占56.2%,在第二波中阳性病例占65.6%。我们还在国际旅行者中发现了128例阳性病例。总之,与第一波暴发相比,在第二波暴发中发现了很大程度上不同的流行病学属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemiological comparison of the first and second wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study among suspected cases.
Many countries have been seen two wave patterns of reported cases of coronavirus diseases. Still, a limited number of studies compared the epidemiological attributes of the first wave and second wave of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. This study was carried out to compare the epidemics of two waves in Bangladesh. This observational study data of suspected cases was collected from June 2020 to April 2021 from a local authorized diagnostic center. From June 27, 2020, to July 27, 2020, was considered as the first wave and from March 20, 2021, to April 20, 2021, was considered a second wave. This period was determined because of observing the highest number of positive cases during that period. Out of 21,359 cases, including 2429 (11.37%) individuals in the first wave and 4989 (23.36%) individuals in the second wave had RT-PCR test for disease confirmation. Among them, 315 people in the first wave and 630 in the second wave were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Male were more vernalized to the positive case, including 204 (64.8%) and 421 (66.8%) during the first and second waves, respectively. People under 41 found 56.2% positive cases during the first wave while it was 65.6% in the second wave. We also found 128 positive cases among international travelers. In conclusion, a large extent of different epidemiological attributes was found in the second wave compared to the first wave of the outbreaks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics
Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of antiproliferative and toxic effects of a peptide from Momordica dioica using in vitro and in vivo studies Investigation of the relationship between matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase with SARS CoV-2 infections Anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activities of the phytochemicals isolated from various parts of broccoli wastes Epidemiological burden, risk factors, and recent therapeutic advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease The potentials of Pangi leaf extract for Aedes spp. mosquito control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1