灌溉与种植对棉花几何效应的影响产量和用水量

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.56454/qowp3595
Srinivasa R. Pinnamanemi, S. Anapalli, D. Fisher, K.Nikhitha Reddy
{"title":"灌溉与种植对棉花几何效应的影响产量和用水量","authors":"Srinivasa R. Pinnamanemi, S. Anapalli, D. Fisher, K.Nikhitha Reddy","doi":"10.56454/qowp3595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing the challenges of dwindling groundwater resources and ever-increasing demands for water necessitate enhancing water use efficiency (WUE) in irrigated agriculture. In a 2-year study, we examined the effects of different levels of irrigation and PG on lint yield and WUE of furrow irrigated cotton in a Dundee silt loam in the Mississippi Delta. The main plots were three irrigation regimes: irrigating every furrow (FI), alternate furrow (HI), and no irrigation (RF) and subplots were two planting geometries (PG): single-row (SR) and twin-row (TR). Across FI and HI no significant differences were observed in plant height and biomass yield at flowering, but chlorophyll content index and leaf area index (LAI) were positively affected. Canopy closure in TR planting occurred earlier than SR leading to higher leaf areas available for harvesting more light during photosynthesis. Averaged across the irrigation regimes, the TR planting enhanced lint yield by 10.6% in 2018 and 17.6% in 2019 compared to SR. The average lint yield in SR and TR were: 1779 and 2028 kg ha-1 under FI, 1803 and 2082 kg ha-1 under HI, and 1573 and 1788 kg ha-1 under RF treatments, respectively. In FI and HI treatments, TR had higher lint yield than RF treatment by 13.8% and 16.5%, respectively. Lint yield in HI with TR had the highest irrigation WUE (3.4 kg ha-1 mm-1) followed by HI with SR (2.7 kg ha-1 mm-1). These results demonstrated that cotton grown in TR with HI could reduce irrigation water demand in silt loams.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Irrigation and Planting Geometry Effects on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Water Use\",\"authors\":\"Srinivasa R. Pinnamanemi, S. Anapalli, D. Fisher, K.Nikhitha Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.56454/qowp3595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Addressing the challenges of dwindling groundwater resources and ever-increasing demands for water necessitate enhancing water use efficiency (WUE) in irrigated agriculture. In a 2-year study, we examined the effects of different levels of irrigation and PG on lint yield and WUE of furrow irrigated cotton in a Dundee silt loam in the Mississippi Delta. The main plots were three irrigation regimes: irrigating every furrow (FI), alternate furrow (HI), and no irrigation (RF) and subplots were two planting geometries (PG): single-row (SR) and twin-row (TR). Across FI and HI no significant differences were observed in plant height and biomass yield at flowering, but chlorophyll content index and leaf area index (LAI) were positively affected. Canopy closure in TR planting occurred earlier than SR leading to higher leaf areas available for harvesting more light during photosynthesis. Averaged across the irrigation regimes, the TR planting enhanced lint yield by 10.6% in 2018 and 17.6% in 2019 compared to SR. The average lint yield in SR and TR were: 1779 and 2028 kg ha-1 under FI, 1803 and 2082 kg ha-1 under HI, and 1573 and 1788 kg ha-1 under RF treatments, respectively. In FI and HI treatments, TR had higher lint yield than RF treatment by 13.8% and 16.5%, respectively. Lint yield in HI with TR had the highest irrigation WUE (3.4 kg ha-1 mm-1) followed by HI with SR (2.7 kg ha-1 mm-1). These results demonstrated that cotton grown in TR with HI could reduce irrigation water demand in silt loams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56454/qowp3595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/qowp3595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

要解决地下水资源减少和对水需求不断增加的挑战,就必须提高灌溉农业的用水效率。在一项为期2年的研究中,我们研究了不同水平的灌溉和PG对密西西比三角洲邓迪淤泥壤土沟灌棉花产量和水分利用效率的影响。主样地有三种灌溉方式:每沟灌溉(FI)、隔沟灌溉(HI)和不灌溉(RF),次样地有两种种植方式:单行(SR)和双行(TR)。不同施肥条件下,植物株高和开花生物量差异不显著,但叶绿素含量指数和叶面积指数(LAI)受到显著影响。TR种植的冠层闭合时间早于SR种植,因此在光合作用期间可用于收获更多光的叶面积较大。各灌溉制度的平均水平显示,与常规灌溉相比,常规灌溉在2018年和2019年的皮棉产量分别提高了10.6%和17.6%。常规灌溉和常规灌溉的平均皮棉产量分别为:FI处理1779和2028 kg ha-1, HI处理1803和2082 kg ha-1, RF处理1573和1788 kg ha-1。在FI和HI处理中,TR比RF处理的皮棉产量分别提高13.8%和16.5%。灌水水分利用效率最高(3.4 kg ha-1 mm-1),其次是灌水水分利用效率最高(2.7 kg ha-1 mm-1)。综上所述,在高施氮条件下种植棉花可以减少淤泥质壤土的灌溉需水量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Irrigation and Planting Geometry Effects on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Water Use
Addressing the challenges of dwindling groundwater resources and ever-increasing demands for water necessitate enhancing water use efficiency (WUE) in irrigated agriculture. In a 2-year study, we examined the effects of different levels of irrigation and PG on lint yield and WUE of furrow irrigated cotton in a Dundee silt loam in the Mississippi Delta. The main plots were three irrigation regimes: irrigating every furrow (FI), alternate furrow (HI), and no irrigation (RF) and subplots were two planting geometries (PG): single-row (SR) and twin-row (TR). Across FI and HI no significant differences were observed in plant height and biomass yield at flowering, but chlorophyll content index and leaf area index (LAI) were positively affected. Canopy closure in TR planting occurred earlier than SR leading to higher leaf areas available for harvesting more light during photosynthesis. Averaged across the irrigation regimes, the TR planting enhanced lint yield by 10.6% in 2018 and 17.6% in 2019 compared to SR. The average lint yield in SR and TR were: 1779 and 2028 kg ha-1 under FI, 1803 and 2082 kg ha-1 under HI, and 1573 and 1788 kg ha-1 under RF treatments, respectively. In FI and HI treatments, TR had higher lint yield than RF treatment by 13.8% and 16.5%, respectively. Lint yield in HI with TR had the highest irrigation WUE (3.4 kg ha-1 mm-1) followed by HI with SR (2.7 kg ha-1 mm-1). These results demonstrated that cotton grown in TR with HI could reduce irrigation water demand in silt loams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1