棉花育种中安装自动称重系统的棉花采摘机的准确性、精密度和收获效率

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.56454/qxuw6885
Jinfa Zhang, S. Hughs
{"title":"棉花育种中安装自动称重系统的棉花采摘机的准确性、精密度和收获效率","authors":"Jinfa Zhang, S. Hughs","doi":"10.56454/qxuw6885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many cotton breeding programs in the U.S. have installed an automatic weighing system in a cotton plot picker to increase operating efficiency in recent years. However, no experimental data are available to document the reliability of such a system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, precision, and harvesting efficiency of a two-row cotton plot picker installed with an automatic weighing system with two scales based on results from replicated field tests from 2013 to 2016. Three tests each year, each containing 32 genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design in two-row plots by 10 m in length. The 2013 to 2015 results showed a highly significant positive correlation in seedcotton weights between the two rows of the same plot for each genotype harvested and weighed by the two scales in the picker, indicating that the two scales are consistent and reliable. In three tests in 2016, one row of each two-row plot was harvested by the picker, and seedcotton weight was compared with another row harvested by hand. A highly significant positive correlation was detected between the two harvesting methods that had similar coefficients of variation (16.14% for hand harvest vs. 16.90% for mechanical harvest). The two-row plot picker harvested a total of 368 single-row plots (10-m long) in six hours daily, whereas hand harvest by one person averaged two plots in four hours. An average of 417 kg ha-1 was lost due to the mechanical harvest.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy, Precision, and Harvesting Efficiency of a Cotton Plot Picker Installed with an Automatic Weighing System in a Cotton Breeding Program\",\"authors\":\"Jinfa Zhang, S. Hughs\",\"doi\":\"10.56454/qxuw6885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many cotton breeding programs in the U.S. have installed an automatic weighing system in a cotton plot picker to increase operating efficiency in recent years. However, no experimental data are available to document the reliability of such a system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, precision, and harvesting efficiency of a two-row cotton plot picker installed with an automatic weighing system with two scales based on results from replicated field tests from 2013 to 2016. Three tests each year, each containing 32 genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design in two-row plots by 10 m in length. The 2013 to 2015 results showed a highly significant positive correlation in seedcotton weights between the two rows of the same plot for each genotype harvested and weighed by the two scales in the picker, indicating that the two scales are consistent and reliable. In three tests in 2016, one row of each two-row plot was harvested by the picker, and seedcotton weight was compared with another row harvested by hand. A highly significant positive correlation was detected between the two harvesting methods that had similar coefficients of variation (16.14% for hand harvest vs. 16.90% for mechanical harvest). The two-row plot picker harvested a total of 368 single-row plots (10-m long) in six hours daily, whereas hand harvest by one person averaged two plots in four hours. An average of 417 kg ha-1 was lost due to the mechanical harvest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56454/qxuw6885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/qxuw6885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,美国许多棉花育种项目都在棉花采摘机上安装了自动称重系统,以提高操作效率。然而,没有可用的实验数据来证明这种系统的可靠性。本研究基于2013 - 2016年重复田间试验结果,对安装双秤自动称重系统的两排棉花采摘机的准确性、精密度和收获效率进行了评价。每年进行3次试验,每次试验包含32个基因型,采用完全随机区组设计,以10 m的长度分成两行。2013 ~ 2015年的结果表明,同一地块两行各基因型棉籽重与采摘机中两种尺度的称重呈极显著正相关,表明两种尺度是一致可靠的。在2016年的三次试验中,每个两行地块的一行采用采摘机收获,并将棉籽重与另一行手工收获的棉籽重进行比较。具有相似变异系数的两种采收方法之间存在高度显著的正相关(手工采收16.14%,机械采收16.90%)。两排采摘机每天在6小时内收获368块单排地块(10米长),而一个人的手工采摘平均在4小时内收获两块地块。由于机械收获,平均每公顷损失417公斤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy, Precision, and Harvesting Efficiency of a Cotton Plot Picker Installed with an Automatic Weighing System in a Cotton Breeding Program
Many cotton breeding programs in the U.S. have installed an automatic weighing system in a cotton plot picker to increase operating efficiency in recent years. However, no experimental data are available to document the reliability of such a system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, precision, and harvesting efficiency of a two-row cotton plot picker installed with an automatic weighing system with two scales based on results from replicated field tests from 2013 to 2016. Three tests each year, each containing 32 genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design in two-row plots by 10 m in length. The 2013 to 2015 results showed a highly significant positive correlation in seedcotton weights between the two rows of the same plot for each genotype harvested and weighed by the two scales in the picker, indicating that the two scales are consistent and reliable. In three tests in 2016, one row of each two-row plot was harvested by the picker, and seedcotton weight was compared with another row harvested by hand. A highly significant positive correlation was detected between the two harvesting methods that had similar coefficients of variation (16.14% for hand harvest vs. 16.90% for mechanical harvest). The two-row plot picker harvested a total of 368 single-row plots (10-m long) in six hours daily, whereas hand harvest by one person averaged two plots in four hours. An average of 417 kg ha-1 was lost due to the mechanical harvest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1