提供给儿科社区教师的奖励和教师发展机会的评估

Jerold Stirling
{"title":"提供给儿科社区教师的奖励和教师发展机会的评估","authors":"Jerold Stirling","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20170612092633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Many medical schools in the US are experiencing difficulty maintaining sufficient ambulatory pediatric training sites for their students. The goals of this study were to assess the incentives, rewards, and faculty development opportunities provided for pediatricians serving as community faculty teaching in pediatric clerkships in the US. Methods: A 10 question prospective survey of the membership of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics incorporated into the organization's 2014 annual survey. Results: Representatives from 92% % (111 /121) of U.S. medical schools responded to the study. Seventy-nine percent of medical schools utilize community faculty to teach pediatrics. Eighty-two percent of respondents were having difficulty recruiting and retaining pediatricians to teach students. Thirty-nine percent of medical schools provided monetary stipends for teaching. Sixty-eight percent of schools provided faculty development for their community faculty. Conclusion: The majority of schools rely on non-monetary incentives to recruit and retain their community faculty. As compared to previous studies, more medical schools are offering financial stipends. Most schools, but not all, offer some form of faculty development training for their community faculty. There is a wide variation in the scope of faculty development training provided to community physicians that teach medical students.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"5 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Rewards and Faculty Development Opportunities Provided to Pediatric Community Faculty\",\"authors\":\"Jerold Stirling\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/JCME.20170612092633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Many medical schools in the US are experiencing difficulty maintaining sufficient ambulatory pediatric training sites for their students. The goals of this study were to assess the incentives, rewards, and faculty development opportunities provided for pediatricians serving as community faculty teaching in pediatric clerkships in the US. Methods: A 10 question prospective survey of the membership of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics incorporated into the organization's 2014 annual survey. Results: Representatives from 92% % (111 /121) of U.S. medical schools responded to the study. Seventy-nine percent of medical schools utilize community faculty to teach pediatrics. Eighty-two percent of respondents were having difficulty recruiting and retaining pediatricians to teach students. Thirty-nine percent of medical schools provided monetary stipends for teaching. Sixty-eight percent of schools provided faculty development for their community faculty. Conclusion: The majority of schools rely on non-monetary incentives to recruit and retain their community faculty. As compared to previous studies, more medical schools are offering financial stipends. Most schools, but not all, offer some form of faculty development training for their community faculty. There is a wide variation in the scope of faculty development training provided to community physicians that teach medical students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contemporary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20170612092633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20170612092633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国的许多医学院都难以为学生提供足够的儿科门诊培训场地。本研究的目的是评估在美国担任儿科见习的社区教师教学的儿科医生的激励、奖励和教师发展机会。方法:对儿科医学生教育委员会成员进行10个问题的前瞻性调查,并纳入该组织2014年年度调查。结果:来自92%(111 /121)美国医学院的代表回应了这项研究。79%的医学院利用社区教师教授儿科学。82%的受访者在招聘和留住儿科医生来教学生方面遇到了困难。39%的医学院为教学提供金钱津贴。68%的学校为他们的社区教师提供教师发展。结论:大多数学校依靠非金钱激励来招募和留住他们的社区教师。与以前的研究相比,更多的医学院提供经济津贴。大多数学校,但不是全部,为他们的社区教师提供某种形式的教师发展培训。为教授医学生的社区医生提供的教师发展培训范围有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Assessment of Rewards and Faculty Development Opportunities Provided to Pediatric Community Faculty
Objective: Many medical schools in the US are experiencing difficulty maintaining sufficient ambulatory pediatric training sites for their students. The goals of this study were to assess the incentives, rewards, and faculty development opportunities provided for pediatricians serving as community faculty teaching in pediatric clerkships in the US. Methods: A 10 question prospective survey of the membership of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics incorporated into the organization's 2014 annual survey. Results: Representatives from 92% % (111 /121) of U.S. medical schools responded to the study. Seventy-nine percent of medical schools utilize community faculty to teach pediatrics. Eighty-two percent of respondents were having difficulty recruiting and retaining pediatricians to teach students. Thirty-nine percent of medical schools provided monetary stipends for teaching. Sixty-eight percent of schools provided faculty development for their community faculty. Conclusion: The majority of schools rely on non-monetary incentives to recruit and retain their community faculty. As compared to previous studies, more medical schools are offering financial stipends. Most schools, but not all, offer some form of faculty development training for their community faculty. There is a wide variation in the scope of faculty development training provided to community physicians that teach medical students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1