双反转恢复序列与液体衰减反转恢复序列检测脑多发性硬化的比较

Nagwan Elhussein, Norah Alazmi, I. Fadulemulla, Zuhal Y. Hamd, Amna Mohamed Ahmed, Sara A. Seifeldin, Q. Alshammari
{"title":"双反转恢复序列与液体衰减反转恢复序列检测脑多发性硬化的比较","authors":"Nagwan Elhussein, Norah Alazmi, I. Fadulemulla, Zuhal Y. Hamd, Amna Mohamed Ahmed, Sara A. Seifeldin, Q. Alshammari","doi":"10.51847/zaqwktglhh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS diagnosis and disease monitoring are mostly based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This study aims to compare a double inversion recovery MRI sequence with a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the brain. A study was conducted on 75 patients whose aged between 10 and 70 years who were having MS in the brain to compare a double inversion recovery DIR sequence with a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery FLAIR sequence at King Salman Specialist Hospital. in this study the age group (30-49) and female patient represented the highest percentage (69%) and (60%) respectively, A correlation between DIR and FLAIR in terms of the number of MS lesions and mean ±SD was found. DIR detected a higher total number of MS lesions in 75 patients tested (a total of 1886 MS lesions were detected in DIR compared to 1723 MS lesions in FLAIR). FLAIR imaging showed higher rates of periventricular lesions (a total of 508 lesions, the Mean ±SD was 9.5± 9.5) than DIR imaging (a total of 423 lesions, the Mean ± SD was 9.0± 9.0), statistically significant (p = 0.007). The DIR sequence detected a higher total number of MS lesions than the FLAIR sequence, while the FLAIR sequence is better at detecting periventricular lesions. There was no statistically significant relationship between the patient’s age groups and the number of lesions in DIR and FLAIR P-value > 0.05.","PeriodicalId":44457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative between Double Inversion Recovery and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequences for Detection of Brain Multiple Sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Nagwan Elhussein, Norah Alazmi, I. Fadulemulla, Zuhal Y. Hamd, Amna Mohamed Ahmed, Sara A. Seifeldin, Q. Alshammari\",\"doi\":\"10.51847/zaqwktglhh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS diagnosis and disease monitoring are mostly based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This study aims to compare a double inversion recovery MRI sequence with a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the brain. A study was conducted on 75 patients whose aged between 10 and 70 years who were having MS in the brain to compare a double inversion recovery DIR sequence with a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery FLAIR sequence at King Salman Specialist Hospital. in this study the age group (30-49) and female patient represented the highest percentage (69%) and (60%) respectively, A correlation between DIR and FLAIR in terms of the number of MS lesions and mean ±SD was found. DIR detected a higher total number of MS lesions in 75 patients tested (a total of 1886 MS lesions were detected in DIR compared to 1723 MS lesions in FLAIR). FLAIR imaging showed higher rates of periventricular lesions (a total of 508 lesions, the Mean ±SD was 9.5± 9.5) than DIR imaging (a total of 423 lesions, the Mean ± SD was 9.0± 9.0), statistically significant (p = 0.007). The DIR sequence detected a higher total number of MS lesions than the FLAIR sequence, while the FLAIR sequence is better at detecting periventricular lesions. There was no statistically significant relationship between the patient’s age groups and the number of lesions in DIR and FLAIR P-value > 0.05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51847/zaqwktglhh\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51847/zaqwktglhh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

多发性硬化症(MS)是中枢神经系统(CNS)最常见的慢性炎症性脱髓鞘疾病。多发性硬化症的诊断和疾病监测大多基于磁共振成像(MRI)。本研究旨在比较双反转恢复MRI序列与液体衰减反转恢复序列在多发性硬化症(MS)的大脑。在萨勒曼国王专科医院对75名年龄在10至70岁之间的脑MS患者进行了一项研究,以比较双反转恢复DIR序列和液体衰减反转恢复FLAIR序列。在本研究中,年龄层(30-49岁)和女性患者所占比例分别最高(69%)和(60%),DIR和FLAIR在MS病变数量和平均±SD方面存在相关性。在75例被检测的患者中,DIR检测到的MS病变总数更高(DIR检测到的MS病变总数为1886个,而FLAIR检测到的MS病变总数为1723个)。FLAIR显像显示心室周围病变发生率(共508个,平均±SD为9.5±9.5)高于DIR显像(共423个,平均±SD为9.0±9.0),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.007)。DIR序列检测MS病变总数高于FLAIR序列,而FLAIR序列检测心室周围病变更佳。患者的年龄与DIR、FLAIR的病变数之间的关系无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative between Double Inversion Recovery and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequences for Detection of Brain Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS diagnosis and disease monitoring are mostly based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This study aims to compare a double inversion recovery MRI sequence with a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the brain. A study was conducted on 75 patients whose aged between 10 and 70 years who were having MS in the brain to compare a double inversion recovery DIR sequence with a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery FLAIR sequence at King Salman Specialist Hospital. in this study the age group (30-49) and female patient represented the highest percentage (69%) and (60%) respectively, A correlation between DIR and FLAIR in terms of the number of MS lesions and mean ±SD was found. DIR detected a higher total number of MS lesions in 75 patients tested (a total of 1886 MS lesions were detected in DIR compared to 1723 MS lesions in FLAIR). FLAIR imaging showed higher rates of periventricular lesions (a total of 508 lesions, the Mean ±SD was 9.5± 9.5) than DIR imaging (a total of 423 lesions, the Mean ± SD was 9.0± 9.0), statistically significant (p = 0.007). The DIR sequence detected a higher total number of MS lesions than the FLAIR sequence, while the FLAIR sequence is better at detecting periventricular lesions. There was no statistically significant relationship between the patient’s age groups and the number of lesions in DIR and FLAIR P-value > 0.05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Value of ascitic fluid lipids in the differentiation between cirrhotic and malignant ascites Analysis of Interaction between Twenty-Seven Pyrimidinone Derivatives with XIAP Using a Theoretical Model Methods of Treatment of Hemangiomas Theoretical Evaluation of Twenty-Cannabinoid Derivatives on Either Androgen Receptor or 5α-Reductase Enzyme Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma is a Rare Cancer with a Poor Prognosis – A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1