犹太教对生命意义的独特观点

IF 0.3 Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Jewish Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5325/jjewiethi.7.1-2.0013
Thaddeus Metz
{"title":"犹太教对生命意义的独特观点","authors":"Thaddeus Metz","doi":"10.5325/jjewiethi.7.1-2.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary Anglo-American philosophy, there has been substantial debate between religious and secular theorists about what would make life meaningful, with a large majority of the religious philosophers having drawn on Christianity. In this article, in contrast, I draw on Judaism, with the aims of articulating characteristically Jewish approaches to life's meaning, which is a kind of intellectual history, and of providing some support for them relative to familiar Christian and Islamic approaches (salient in the Tanakh , the New Testament, and the Qur’an ), which is a more philosophical enterprise. Sometimes I point out that dominant views in contemporary philosophy favor a Jewish approach to meaning relative to rivals, e.g., insofar as Judaism contends that a merely earthly life can be meaningful. Other times I suggest that Judaism","PeriodicalId":40209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jewish Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judaism's Distinct Perspectives on the Meaning of Life\",\"authors\":\"Thaddeus Metz\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jjewiethi.7.1-2.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In contemporary Anglo-American philosophy, there has been substantial debate between religious and secular theorists about what would make life meaningful, with a large majority of the religious philosophers having drawn on Christianity. In this article, in contrast, I draw on Judaism, with the aims of articulating characteristically Jewish approaches to life's meaning, which is a kind of intellectual history, and of providing some support for them relative to familiar Christian and Islamic approaches (salient in the Tanakh , the New Testament, and the Qur’an ), which is a more philosophical enterprise. Sometimes I point out that dominant views in contemporary philosophy favor a Jewish approach to meaning relative to rivals, e.g., insofar as Judaism contends that a merely earthly life can be meaningful. Other times I suggest that Judaism\",\"PeriodicalId\":40209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Jewish Ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Jewish Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jjewiethi.7.1-2.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jewish Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jjewiethi.7.1-2.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在当代英美哲学中,宗教理论家和世俗理论家之间就什么能使生活有意义进行了大量辩论,其中绝大多数宗教哲学家都借鉴了基督教。在这篇文章中,相反,我借鉴了犹太教,目的是阐明犹太人对生命意义的典型看法,这是一种思想史,并为他们提供一些支持,相对于熟悉的基督教和伊斯兰教的方法(在塔纳赫,新约和古兰经中突出),这是一个更哲学的事业。有时我指出,在当代哲学中占主导地位的观点倾向于犹太人的方法,而不是对手,例如,就犹太教而言,仅仅是世俗的生活是有意义的。有时我建议犹太教
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judaism's Distinct Perspectives on the Meaning of Life
In contemporary Anglo-American philosophy, there has been substantial debate between religious and secular theorists about what would make life meaningful, with a large majority of the religious philosophers having drawn on Christianity. In this article, in contrast, I draw on Judaism, with the aims of articulating characteristically Jewish approaches to life's meaning, which is a kind of intellectual history, and of providing some support for them relative to familiar Christian and Islamic approaches (salient in the Tanakh , the New Testament, and the Qur’an ), which is a more philosophical enterprise. Sometimes I point out that dominant views in contemporary philosophy favor a Jewish approach to meaning relative to rivals, e.g., insofar as Judaism contends that a merely earthly life can be meaningful. Other times I suggest that Judaism
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Exigency of Ethics: Interpolating Lévinasian Proximity into Kant’s Approximation Covid-19 in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel’s Duty to Vaccinate Living with the Other: The Ethic of Inner Retreat Heschel’s Theory of Halakhah Publicizing the Miracle of Vaccination: “Vaccine Selfies” as a Jewish Visual Ethic of Embodied Obligation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1