1760年至1810年间摩拉维亚档案的选择与销毁

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Moravian History Pub Date : 2012-11-13 DOI:10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170
P. Peucker
{"title":"1760年至1810年间摩拉维亚档案的选择与销毁","authors":"P. Peucker","doi":"10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Moravians have traditionally been considered good record-keepers, substantial amounts of documents were destroyed during the decades between 1760 and 1810. When the Unity Archives was founded as the central archives for the worldwide Moravian Church in 1764, a group of specially appointed “revisers” sifted through the material and destroyed documents that did not fit the reinvented image of the Moravian Church of the post-Zinzendorf era. By controlling the content of their archives, Moravians tried to manipulate the historiography of their church. As this article will argue, the work of the Moravian archivist was not invisible; on the contrary, the archivist edited the surviving record.","PeriodicalId":40312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moravian History","volume":"12 1","pages":"170 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection and Destruction in Moravian Archives Between 1760 and 1810\",\"authors\":\"P. Peucker\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Moravians have traditionally been considered good record-keepers, substantial amounts of documents were destroyed during the decades between 1760 and 1810. When the Unity Archives was founded as the central archives for the worldwide Moravian Church in 1764, a group of specially appointed “revisers” sifted through the material and destroyed documents that did not fit the reinvented image of the Moravian Church of the post-Zinzendorf era. By controlling the content of their archives, Moravians tried to manipulate the historiography of their church. As this article will argue, the work of the Moravian archivist was not invisible; on the contrary, the archivist edited the surviving record.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Moravian History\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Moravian History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moravian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.12.2.0170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

尽管摩拉维亚人传统上被认为是优秀的记录保持者,但在1760年至1810年之间的几十年里,大量的文件被销毁。1764年,当统一档案馆作为世界摩拉维亚教会的中心档案馆成立时,一群特别任命的“修订者”筛选了材料,并销毁了不符合后辛森多夫时代摩拉维亚教会重塑形象的文件。通过控制档案的内容,摩拉维亚人试图操纵他们教会的历史编纂。正如本文将要论证的那样,摩拉维亚档案保管员的工作并不是无形的;相反,档案保管员编辑了现存的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selection and Destruction in Moravian Archives Between 1760 and 1810
Although Moravians have traditionally been considered good record-keepers, substantial amounts of documents were destroyed during the decades between 1760 and 1810. When the Unity Archives was founded as the central archives for the worldwide Moravian Church in 1764, a group of specially appointed “revisers” sifted through the material and destroyed documents that did not fit the reinvented image of the Moravian Church of the post-Zinzendorf era. By controlling the content of their archives, Moravians tried to manipulate the historiography of their church. As this article will argue, the work of the Moravian archivist was not invisible; on the contrary, the archivist edited the surviving record.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Missionaries and Modernity: Education in the British Empire, 1830–1910 Babel of the Atlantic Peter Boehler’s Universalist Letter Spangenberg’s 1760 Letter about Slaveholding in St. Thomas and Bethlehem Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1