{"title":"英国语言史学中的胡斯,1863-2013","authors":"T. Fudge","doi":"10.5325/JMORAHIST.16.2.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This historiographical article seeks to delineate the main sources and trajectories of interpretation over a 150-year period that has shaped the understanding of Jan Hus in the Anglophone world. The article also assesses the scholarly value of the major writings that have appeared. The evaluation is intentionally limited to books written wholly or largely about Hus while recognizing that a handful of scholars have made serious or important contributions in ways other than producing a monograph. The author argues there is a serious lack of historiographical awareness in the English-speaking world around the figure of Jan Hus that has been apparent during the many international symposia and other events marking the six-hundredth anniversary of his death in 2015. This article, building on the seminal work of Jarold K. Zeman in the 1970s, identifies the existing historiographical traditions, recent developments and advances, and the major textual contributions, and offers an opinion on the future of Jan Hus studies.","PeriodicalId":40312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moravian History","volume":"16 1","pages":"138 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jan Hus in English Language Historiography, 1863–2013\",\"authors\":\"T. Fudge\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JMORAHIST.16.2.0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This historiographical article seeks to delineate the main sources and trajectories of interpretation over a 150-year period that has shaped the understanding of Jan Hus in the Anglophone world. The article also assesses the scholarly value of the major writings that have appeared. The evaluation is intentionally limited to books written wholly or largely about Hus while recognizing that a handful of scholars have made serious or important contributions in ways other than producing a monograph. The author argues there is a serious lack of historiographical awareness in the English-speaking world around the figure of Jan Hus that has been apparent during the many international symposia and other events marking the six-hundredth anniversary of his death in 2015. This article, building on the seminal work of Jarold K. Zeman in the 1970s, identifies the existing historiographical traditions, recent developments and advances, and the major textual contributions, and offers an opinion on the future of Jan Hus studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Moravian History\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Moravian History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.16.2.0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moravian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.16.2.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这篇史学文章试图描述在150年期间的主要来源和解释轨迹,这些解释塑造了英语世界对简·胡斯的理解。文章还评估了已出现的主要著作的学术价值。本评价有意限于全部或大部分关于胡斯的著作,同时认识到少数学者在撰写专著之外的其他方面做出了严肃或重要的贡献。作者认为,在英语世界,人们对Jan Hus这个人物的史学认识严重缺乏,这一点在2015年纪念Jan Hus逝世600周年的许多国际研讨会和其他活动中都很明显。本文以Jarold K. Zeman在20世纪70年代的开创性工作为基础,确定了现有的史学传统,最近的发展和进步,以及主要的文本贡献,并对Jan Hus研究的未来提出了意见。
Jan Hus in English Language Historiography, 1863–2013
This historiographical article seeks to delineate the main sources and trajectories of interpretation over a 150-year period that has shaped the understanding of Jan Hus in the Anglophone world. The article also assesses the scholarly value of the major writings that have appeared. The evaluation is intentionally limited to books written wholly or largely about Hus while recognizing that a handful of scholars have made serious or important contributions in ways other than producing a monograph. The author argues there is a serious lack of historiographical awareness in the English-speaking world around the figure of Jan Hus that has been apparent during the many international symposia and other events marking the six-hundredth anniversary of his death in 2015. This article, building on the seminal work of Jarold K. Zeman in the 1970s, identifies the existing historiographical traditions, recent developments and advances, and the major textual contributions, and offers an opinion on the future of Jan Hus studies.