条件性关系对样本均衡任务的影响

Mario Amado Serrano Vargas , Edgar Eduardo Montes Castro
{"title":"条件性关系对样本均衡任务的影响","authors":"Mario Amado Serrano Vargas ,&nbsp;Edgar Eduardo Montes Castro","doi":"10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study assessed if the transfer of behavior depends on the functional complexity of the initial task. Four groups of college students were exposed to second-order matching-to-samples tasks and two kinds of transfer trials: intramodal/extrarelational and extramodal/extrarelational. Between groups, tasks differed in both conditionality relations (i.e., conditional discrimination versus simple discrimination) and response requirements (i.e., instrumental versus observational). The highest percentage of correct responses in transfer tests were observed for the group exposed to the conditional discrimination situation and the instrumental response requirement. Results are discussed in relation to previous experiments on the effects of intrasituational contingencies upon linguistically-regulated behavior and variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078014702871/pdfft?md5=d66fb69b94ad8c2fb4a5847466f1b20c&pid=1-s2.0-S2007078014702871-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efectos de las relaciones de condicionalidad en tareas de igualación de la muestra\",\"authors\":\"Mario Amado Serrano Vargas ,&nbsp;Edgar Eduardo Montes Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study assessed if the transfer of behavior depends on the functional complexity of the initial task. Four groups of college students were exposed to second-order matching-to-samples tasks and two kinds of transfer trials: intramodal/extrarelational and extramodal/extrarelational. Between groups, tasks differed in both conditionality relations (i.e., conditional discrimination versus simple discrimination) and response requirements (i.e., instrumental versus observational). The highest percentage of correct responses in transfer tests were observed for the group exposed to the conditional discrimination situation and the instrumental response requirement. Results are discussed in relation to previous experiments on the effects of intrasituational contingencies upon linguistically-regulated behavior and variability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 67-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078014702871/pdfft?md5=d66fb69b94ad8c2fb4a5847466f1b20c&pid=1-s2.0-S2007078014702871-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078014702871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078014702871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了行为转移是否取决于初始任务的功能复杂性。四组大学生接受二阶样本匹配任务和两种迁移试验:模内/外关系和模外/外关系。在两组之间,任务在条件关系(即条件歧视与简单歧视)和反应要求(即工具性与观察性)上都存在差异。在迁移测试中,暴露于条件歧视情境和工具反应要求的组的正确反应百分比最高。结果讨论了有关先前的实验对语言调节的行为和变异性的情境内偶然性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efectos de las relaciones de condicionalidad en tareas de igualación de la muestra

The present study assessed if the transfer of behavior depends on the functional complexity of the initial task. Four groups of college students were exposed to second-order matching-to-samples tasks and two kinds of transfer trials: intramodal/extrarelational and extramodal/extrarelational. Between groups, tasks differed in both conditionality relations (i.e., conditional discrimination versus simple discrimination) and response requirements (i.e., instrumental versus observational). The highest percentage of correct responses in transfer tests were observed for the group exposed to the conditional discrimination situation and the instrumental response requirement. Results are discussed in relation to previous experiments on the effects of intrasituational contingencies upon linguistically-regulated behavior and variability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Propiedades psicométricas de una escala de autoeficacia percibida para el uso correcto del condón en jóvenes universitarios Propiedades psicométricas de la versión corta de la escala de Empoderamiento y Agencia Personal en estudiantes universitarios. Resiliencia, recursos familiares y espirituales en cuidadores de niños con discapacidad What factors are related to self-perceived health? The relationship between Sense of Coherence, behaviors and health on Peruvian emerging adults Deseo sexual en jóvenes de la Ciudad de México: amor vs. placer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1