Mwea和Ahero稻田按蚊对杀虫剂的抗性、寄主偏好和恶性疟原虫的寄生率

Jonathan C. Ngala, L. Kamau, P. Mireji, J. Mburu, C. Mbogo
{"title":"Mwea和Ahero稻田按蚊对杀虫剂的抗性、寄主偏好和恶性疟原虫的寄生率","authors":"Jonathan C. Ngala, L. Kamau, P. Mireji, J. Mburu, C. Mbogo","doi":"10.5376/JMR.2015.05.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of Anopheles mosquito to transmit malaria in nature is partly enhanced by; resistance of mosquito to insecticides, feeding preference for human host and infection by Plasmodium falciparum . An assessment was conducted to determine the status of these parameters in Anopheles populations in Mwea and Ahero rice irrigation schemes in Kenya. This was important in order to understand their potential influence on local malaria transmission. A total of 1,200 female Anopheles mosquitoes (gravid and blood fed) were sampled from both sites by indoor and outdoor methods. Anopheles samples identification to their respective species in the field was done using morphological features and taxonomic keys. In Mwea scheme, all the 600 Anopheles mosquitoes collected were An. gambiae s.l out of which 195 were gravid. In Ahero, 250 An. gambiae s.l (out of which 81 were gravid) and 350 An. funestus (out of which 181 were gravid) were collected. Gravid Anopheles mosquitoes were allowed to oviposit to give F 1 generations in the insectary. These F 1 , (four replicates of 25 mosquitoes per species per insecticide) were assessed for susceptibility to permethrin, deltamethrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), bendiocarb or fenitrothion using standard WHO protocol. Susceptible An. gambiae s.s Kisumu strain (25 mosquitoes per the 100 test mosquitoes) was used as positive control. The 1,200 field samples were further identified to their respective species using rDNA-PCR using their legs and wings. Source (s) of blood meal in 405 An. gambiae s.l from Mwea, 169 An. gambiae s.l and 269 An. funestus from Ahero were determined using blood meal Elisa. The presence of Plasmodium falciparum Welch, 1897 in the salivary glands was assessed by sporozoite Elisa in all the field collected samples. All Anopheles mosquito samples from Mwea were Anopheles arabiensis Patton, 1905, while those from Ahero were a mixed species of Anopheles arabiensis (41.7%), Anopheles funestus sensu stricto Giles , 1900 (57%), Anopheles rivulorum Leesoni, 1935 (0.66%), Anopheles leesoni Evans, 1931 (0.3%) and Anopheles parensis Gillies, 1935 (0.3%). Mosquito samples from both study sites showed reduced susceptibility to the test insecticides. An. arabiensis mosquitoes from Mwea had a human blood meal index at 0.22 (n=405).  P. falciparum circumsporozoite infection in An. arabiensis from Mwea were reported in Murinduko village at 1.5% (n=200). In Ahero, human blood meal indices were at 0.00 (n=169) and 0.17 (n=269) for An. arabiensis and An. funestus respectively. P. falciparum circumsporozoite infections in An. funestus sampled from Kamagaga and Wagai villages in Ahero were at 5% (n=147) and 2.2% (n=183) respectively.","PeriodicalId":92079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mosquito research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insecticide resistance, Host preference and Plasmodium falciparum parasite rates in Anopheles mosquitoes in Mwea and Ahero rice schemes\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan C. Ngala, L. Kamau, P. Mireji, J. Mburu, C. Mbogo\",\"doi\":\"10.5376/JMR.2015.05.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability of Anopheles mosquito to transmit malaria in nature is partly enhanced by; resistance of mosquito to insecticides, feeding preference for human host and infection by Plasmodium falciparum . An assessment was conducted to determine the status of these parameters in Anopheles populations in Mwea and Ahero rice irrigation schemes in Kenya. This was important in order to understand their potential influence on local malaria transmission. A total of 1,200 female Anopheles mosquitoes (gravid and blood fed) were sampled from both sites by indoor and outdoor methods. Anopheles samples identification to their respective species in the field was done using morphological features and taxonomic keys. In Mwea scheme, all the 600 Anopheles mosquitoes collected were An. gambiae s.l out of which 195 were gravid. In Ahero, 250 An. gambiae s.l (out of which 81 were gravid) and 350 An. funestus (out of which 181 were gravid) were collected. Gravid Anopheles mosquitoes were allowed to oviposit to give F 1 generations in the insectary. These F 1 , (four replicates of 25 mosquitoes per species per insecticide) were assessed for susceptibility to permethrin, deltamethrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), bendiocarb or fenitrothion using standard WHO protocol. Susceptible An. gambiae s.s Kisumu strain (25 mosquitoes per the 100 test mosquitoes) was used as positive control. The 1,200 field samples were further identified to their respective species using rDNA-PCR using their legs and wings. Source (s) of blood meal in 405 An. gambiae s.l from Mwea, 169 An. gambiae s.l and 269 An. funestus from Ahero were determined using blood meal Elisa. The presence of Plasmodium falciparum Welch, 1897 in the salivary glands was assessed by sporozoite Elisa in all the field collected samples. All Anopheles mosquito samples from Mwea were Anopheles arabiensis Patton, 1905, while those from Ahero were a mixed species of Anopheles arabiensis (41.7%), Anopheles funestus sensu stricto Giles , 1900 (57%), Anopheles rivulorum Leesoni, 1935 (0.66%), Anopheles leesoni Evans, 1931 (0.3%) and Anopheles parensis Gillies, 1935 (0.3%). Mosquito samples from both study sites showed reduced susceptibility to the test insecticides. An. arabiensis mosquitoes from Mwea had a human blood meal index at 0.22 (n=405).  P. falciparum circumsporozoite infection in An. arabiensis from Mwea were reported in Murinduko village at 1.5% (n=200). In Ahero, human blood meal indices were at 0.00 (n=169) and 0.17 (n=269) for An. arabiensis and An. funestus respectively. P. falciparum circumsporozoite infections in An. funestus sampled from Kamagaga and Wagai villages in Ahero were at 5% (n=147) and 2.2% (n=183) respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mosquito research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mosquito research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5376/JMR.2015.05.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mosquito research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5376/JMR.2015.05.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

按蚊在自然界传播疟疾的能力部分增强于以下方面:蚊子对杀虫剂的抗性、对人类宿主的摄食偏好和恶性疟原虫感染。为确定肯尼亚Mwea和Ahero水稻灌溉计划中这些参数在按蚊种群中的状况进行了评估。这对于了解它们对当地疟疾传播的潜在影响非常重要。采用室内法和室外法在两个地点共采集了1200只母按蚊(妊娠和吸血)。利用形态特征和分类键对野外按蚊标本进行了种类鉴定。在Mwea方案中,收集的600只按蚊均为安氏按蚊。其中195人是孕妇。公元250年,阿希罗。冈比亚人1只(其中81只是孕妇)和350只。收集了其中181个胚胎。怀孕的按蚊在昆虫体内产卵f1代。采用世卫组织标准方案,对这些f1(每种杀虫剂每种25只蚊子的4个重复)进行了对氯菊酯、溴氰菊酯、二氯二苯三氯乙烷(DDT)、苯虫威或杀虫硫磷的敏感性评估。一个敏感。以冈比亚蚊基苏木株(每100只试验蚊25只)作为阳性对照。利用其腿和翅膀,利用rDNA-PCR进一步鉴定了1200个野外样本的物种。公元405年血粉的来源。gambiae s.l来自安哥拉的Mwea。冈比亚s.l 1和269安。采用血粉Elisa法测定阿海罗菌菌丝。采用孢子子Elisa法对所有野外采集标本涎腺恶性疟原虫Welch, 1897进行检测。Mwea地区蚊种均为阿拉伯按蚊(1905年)巴顿按蚊,而阿hero地区蚊种为阿拉伯按蚊(41.7%)、严格感氏按蚊(1900年)(57%)、河纹李氏按蚊(1935年)(0.66%)、李氏埃文斯按蚊(1931年)(0.3%)和利氏李氏按蚊(1935年)的混合种。来自两个研究地点的蚊子样本显示对试验杀虫剂的敏感性降低。一个。Mwea阿拉比蚊的人血粉指数为0.22 (n=405)。安徽恶性疟原虫环孢子虫感染。Murinduko村报告Mwea arabiensis占1.5% (n=200)。阿hero的人血粉指数分别为0.00 (n=169)和0.17 (n=269)。arabiensis和An。funestus分别。安徽恶性疟原虫环孢子虫感染。在阿hero的Kamagaga村和Wagai村取样的funestus分别为5% (n=147)和2.2% (n=183)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insecticide resistance, Host preference and Plasmodium falciparum parasite rates in Anopheles mosquitoes in Mwea and Ahero rice schemes
The ability of Anopheles mosquito to transmit malaria in nature is partly enhanced by; resistance of mosquito to insecticides, feeding preference for human host and infection by Plasmodium falciparum . An assessment was conducted to determine the status of these parameters in Anopheles populations in Mwea and Ahero rice irrigation schemes in Kenya. This was important in order to understand their potential influence on local malaria transmission. A total of 1,200 female Anopheles mosquitoes (gravid and blood fed) were sampled from both sites by indoor and outdoor methods. Anopheles samples identification to their respective species in the field was done using morphological features and taxonomic keys. In Mwea scheme, all the 600 Anopheles mosquitoes collected were An. gambiae s.l out of which 195 were gravid. In Ahero, 250 An. gambiae s.l (out of which 81 were gravid) and 350 An. funestus (out of which 181 were gravid) were collected. Gravid Anopheles mosquitoes were allowed to oviposit to give F 1 generations in the insectary. These F 1 , (four replicates of 25 mosquitoes per species per insecticide) were assessed for susceptibility to permethrin, deltamethrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), bendiocarb or fenitrothion using standard WHO protocol. Susceptible An. gambiae s.s Kisumu strain (25 mosquitoes per the 100 test mosquitoes) was used as positive control. The 1,200 field samples were further identified to their respective species using rDNA-PCR using their legs and wings. Source (s) of blood meal in 405 An. gambiae s.l from Mwea, 169 An. gambiae s.l and 269 An. funestus from Ahero were determined using blood meal Elisa. The presence of Plasmodium falciparum Welch, 1897 in the salivary glands was assessed by sporozoite Elisa in all the field collected samples. All Anopheles mosquito samples from Mwea were Anopheles arabiensis Patton, 1905, while those from Ahero were a mixed species of Anopheles arabiensis (41.7%), Anopheles funestus sensu stricto Giles , 1900 (57%), Anopheles rivulorum Leesoni, 1935 (0.66%), Anopheles leesoni Evans, 1931 (0.3%) and Anopheles parensis Gillies, 1935 (0.3%). Mosquito samples from both study sites showed reduced susceptibility to the test insecticides. An. arabiensis mosquitoes from Mwea had a human blood meal index at 0.22 (n=405).  P. falciparum circumsporozoite infection in An. arabiensis from Mwea were reported in Murinduko village at 1.5% (n=200). In Ahero, human blood meal indices were at 0.00 (n=169) and 0.17 (n=269) for An. arabiensis and An. funestus respectively. P. falciparum circumsporozoite infections in An. funestus sampled from Kamagaga and Wagai villages in Ahero were at 5% (n=147) and 2.2% (n=183) respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of CRISPRCas9 in Gene Editing of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes: Methods and Challenges Complementary Effects of Crude Ethanol Phytolacca dodecandra Extracts with House Characteristics on Densities of Indoor Resting Mosquitoes in Western Kenya Meteorological Parameters and Mosquito Species Diversity and Abundance along the Arabian Sea Coastline of Alappuzha District, India: A Year-round Study (2017-18) Laboratory Evaluation of Extract from Peels and Seeds of Some Citrus Species against Anopheles Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) Ecology of Preimaginal Culicine Mosquitoes in Rock Pools on Inselbergs Within Kaduna State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1