自适应项目管理:用于管理项目范围的最常用工件的调查

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS Revista de Gestao e Projetos Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.5585/GEP.V12I1.18632
Ivete Rodrigues, Danilo Rabetti
{"title":"自适应项目管理:用于管理项目范围的最常用工件的调查","authors":"Ivete Rodrigues, Danilo Rabetti","doi":"10.5585/GEP.V12I1.18632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper objectives are (a) to map the scope management artifacts recommended by predictive and agile methods; (b) verify which of them have been used by project managers and their organizations; and c) identify and analyze the use of the adaptive project management approach according to the project complexity. Based on the literature review, a set of traditional and agile artifacts for project scope management was consolidated. Then, the survey method was used to verify which artifacts are most used by project managers in view of the complexity of the projects. The results showed that the majority of project managers still do not have flexibility in choosing the artifacts used in the projects. Predictive artifacts are the most used, but there are indications that companies are beginning to migrate to an adaptive approach. The study offers an academic contribution to the consolidation of the artifacts available for managing the scope of a project, both in the traditional and in the agile methodologies. It also contributes to analyses the artifacts that are actually in use, in order to better understand how the choice of artifacts is made, regardless of unique methodological approaches. In terms of managerial implications, the results may contribute to the companies' practice, helping them to decide on the use of techniques and artifacts for scope management in both approaches, avoiding using the agile methodologies indiscriminately or remaining rooted in the controls and plans of traditional methodologies.","PeriodicalId":42575,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao e Projetos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestão adaptativa de projetos: um levantamento dos artefatos mais utilizados para gerenciar o escopo do projeto\",\"authors\":\"Ivete Rodrigues, Danilo Rabetti\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/GEP.V12I1.18632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper objectives are (a) to map the scope management artifacts recommended by predictive and agile methods; (b) verify which of them have been used by project managers and their organizations; and c) identify and analyze the use of the adaptive project management approach according to the project complexity. Based on the literature review, a set of traditional and agile artifacts for project scope management was consolidated. Then, the survey method was used to verify which artifacts are most used by project managers in view of the complexity of the projects. The results showed that the majority of project managers still do not have flexibility in choosing the artifacts used in the projects. Predictive artifacts are the most used, but there are indications that companies are beginning to migrate to an adaptive approach. The study offers an academic contribution to the consolidation of the artifacts available for managing the scope of a project, both in the traditional and in the agile methodologies. It also contributes to analyses the artifacts that are actually in use, in order to better understand how the choice of artifacts is made, regardless of unique methodological approaches. In terms of managerial implications, the results may contribute to the companies' practice, helping them to decide on the use of techniques and artifacts for scope management in both approaches, avoiding using the agile methodologies indiscriminately or remaining rooted in the controls and plans of traditional methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao e Projetos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao e Projetos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V12I1.18632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao e Projetos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V12I1.18632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目标是(a)映射预测性和敏捷方法推荐的范围管理工件;(b)核查项目经理及其组织使用了哪些方法;c)根据项目复杂性识别和分析适应性项目管理方法的使用。在文献综述的基础上,对一组用于项目范围管理的传统和敏捷工件进行了整合。然后,根据项目的复杂性,使用调查方法来验证哪些工件是项目经理最常用的。结果表明,大多数项目经理在选择项目中使用的工件时仍然没有灵活性。预测性工件是最常用的,但是有迹象表明公司正在开始迁移到自适应方法。该研究为传统和敏捷方法中用于管理项目范围的工件的整合提供了学术贡献。它还有助于分析实际使用的工件,以便更好地理解工件的选择是如何做出的,而不考虑独特的方法方法。就管理含义而言,结果可能有助于公司的实践,帮助他们决定在两种方法中使用技术和工件进行范围管理,避免不加区分地使用敏捷方法或保留传统方法的控制和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gestão adaptativa de projetos: um levantamento dos artefatos mais utilizados para gerenciar o escopo do projeto
The paper objectives are (a) to map the scope management artifacts recommended by predictive and agile methods; (b) verify which of them have been used by project managers and their organizations; and c) identify and analyze the use of the adaptive project management approach according to the project complexity. Based on the literature review, a set of traditional and agile artifacts for project scope management was consolidated. Then, the survey method was used to verify which artifacts are most used by project managers in view of the complexity of the projects. The results showed that the majority of project managers still do not have flexibility in choosing the artifacts used in the projects. Predictive artifacts are the most used, but there are indications that companies are beginning to migrate to an adaptive approach. The study offers an academic contribution to the consolidation of the artifacts available for managing the scope of a project, both in the traditional and in the agile methodologies. It also contributes to analyses the artifacts that are actually in use, in order to better understand how the choice of artifacts is made, regardless of unique methodological approaches. In terms of managerial implications, the results may contribute to the companies' practice, helping them to decide on the use of techniques and artifacts for scope management in both approaches, avoiding using the agile methodologies indiscriminately or remaining rooted in the controls and plans of traditional methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Project manager competencies associated with the projects' success in the public sector. Utilização do método AHP em projeto para seleção de uma agência de marketing em uma empresa B2B Gestão de projeto de inovação: uma análise empírica baseada na pesquisa-ação Avaliando uma ferramenta baseada em dados históricos para auxiliar o gerenciamento de riscos: um estudo de caso em projetos de software A metodologia de Lean Office aplicada em uma gerência de projetos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1