使用敏捷和传统方法的项目经理的能力:比较研究

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS Revista de Gestao e Projetos Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.5585/GEP.V12I1.17534
Maria Paula Novakoski Perides, Erika Borgonovo Barrote, R. Sbragia
{"title":"使用敏捷和传统方法的项目经理的能力:比较研究","authors":"Maria Paula Novakoski Perides, Erika Borgonovo Barrote, R. Sbragia","doi":"10.5585/GEP.V12I1.17534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is rapidly changing, forcing organizations to adapt their processes in order to respond quickly to these constant changes. In the project management scenario, new methodologies are increasingly present, bringing a more agile and lean approach. In this context, the project manager with formal authority over the team is gradually giving way to a leader who acts more as a facilitator, removing obstacles and promoting collaboration and continuous learning. Thus, the objective of this article is to compare the competencies considered most important for a project manager who works predominantly with Traditional methodologies and the project leader who uses Agile approaches. For this, a survey was carried out, using an online questionnaire, submitted to professionals working on projects. The 142 valid responses received were subjected to parametric through correspondence and profile analysis, as well as non-parametric statistical analysis, using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient method. The five competencies considered most important were the same for the two groups, but they were ordered in different ways. They are: Personal Integrity and Reliability, Personal Communication, Teamwork, Strategy and Relationships and Engagement Statistical analyzes did not allow categorically concluding that there are differences in the perception of the importance of skills by professionals working with Agile and Traditional methodologies, opening a very promising discussion about the way in which these new approaches are being incorporated by organizations and perceived by its professional.","PeriodicalId":42575,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao e Projetos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"As competências de gestores de projetos que atuam com métodos ágeis e tradicionais: um estudo comparativo\",\"authors\":\"Maria Paula Novakoski Perides, Erika Borgonovo Barrote, R. Sbragia\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/GEP.V12I1.17534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The world is rapidly changing, forcing organizations to adapt their processes in order to respond quickly to these constant changes. In the project management scenario, new methodologies are increasingly present, bringing a more agile and lean approach. In this context, the project manager with formal authority over the team is gradually giving way to a leader who acts more as a facilitator, removing obstacles and promoting collaboration and continuous learning. Thus, the objective of this article is to compare the competencies considered most important for a project manager who works predominantly with Traditional methodologies and the project leader who uses Agile approaches. For this, a survey was carried out, using an online questionnaire, submitted to professionals working on projects. The 142 valid responses received were subjected to parametric through correspondence and profile analysis, as well as non-parametric statistical analysis, using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient method. The five competencies considered most important were the same for the two groups, but they were ordered in different ways. They are: Personal Integrity and Reliability, Personal Communication, Teamwork, Strategy and Relationships and Engagement Statistical analyzes did not allow categorically concluding that there are differences in the perception of the importance of skills by professionals working with Agile and Traditional methodologies, opening a very promising discussion about the way in which these new approaches are being incorporated by organizations and perceived by its professional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao e Projetos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao e Projetos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V12I1.17534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao e Projetos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V12I1.17534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

世界正在迅速变化,迫使组织调整他们的过程,以便快速响应这些不断的变化。在项目管理场景中,新的方法越来越多地出现,带来了更加敏捷和精益的方法。在这种情况下,对团队具有正式权威的项目经理逐渐让位给领导者,后者更多地充当促进者的角色,消除障碍,促进协作和持续学习。因此,本文的目的是比较对于主要使用传统方法的项目经理和使用敏捷方法的项目负责人来说最重要的能力。为此,进行了一项调查,使用在线问卷,提交给从事项目的专业人员。采用Kendall等级相关系数法对收到的142份有效问卷进行参数化的对应分析和剖面分析,以及非参数化的统计分析。两组人认为最重要的五种能力是相同的,但它们的排序方式不同。它们是:个人诚信和可靠性、个人沟通、团队合作、战略和关系以及敬业度。统计分析并不能明确地得出专业人员在使用敏捷方法和传统方法时对技能重要性的看法存在差异的结论,这开启了一场非常有希望的讨论,即这些新方法是如何被组织所采用的,以及如何被专业人员所理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
As competências de gestores de projetos que atuam com métodos ágeis e tradicionais: um estudo comparativo
The world is rapidly changing, forcing organizations to adapt their processes in order to respond quickly to these constant changes. In the project management scenario, new methodologies are increasingly present, bringing a more agile and lean approach. In this context, the project manager with formal authority over the team is gradually giving way to a leader who acts more as a facilitator, removing obstacles and promoting collaboration and continuous learning. Thus, the objective of this article is to compare the competencies considered most important for a project manager who works predominantly with Traditional methodologies and the project leader who uses Agile approaches. For this, a survey was carried out, using an online questionnaire, submitted to professionals working on projects. The 142 valid responses received were subjected to parametric through correspondence and profile analysis, as well as non-parametric statistical analysis, using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient method. The five competencies considered most important were the same for the two groups, but they were ordered in different ways. They are: Personal Integrity and Reliability, Personal Communication, Teamwork, Strategy and Relationships and Engagement Statistical analyzes did not allow categorically concluding that there are differences in the perception of the importance of skills by professionals working with Agile and Traditional methodologies, opening a very promising discussion about the way in which these new approaches are being incorporated by organizations and perceived by its professional.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Project manager competencies associated with the projects' success in the public sector. Utilização do método AHP em projeto para seleção de uma agência de marketing em uma empresa B2B Gestão de projeto de inovação: uma análise empírica baseada na pesquisa-ação Avaliando uma ferramenta baseada em dados históricos para auxiliar o gerenciamento de riscos: um estudo de caso em projetos de software A metodologia de Lean Office aplicada em uma gerência de projetos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1