建筑业健康安全因素的识别与分类

Deep Upadhyaya, Mohammedshakil Malek
{"title":"建筑业健康安全因素的识别与分类","authors":"Deep Upadhyaya, Mohammedshakil Malek","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2023.8.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to examine the various attributes that impact health and safety in construction (HSIC) across different companies, stakeholders, and nations. The objective is to identify these attributes and organize them within a framework to facilitate a clearer understanding. The research identified common characteristics that promote the adoption of HSIC, yielding advantages for governmental, private, and public entities. The United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and Hong Kong are considered the leading countries in terms of conducting research on HSIC attributes. There exists significant potential for enhancing the contributions of developing countries. The proposed framework acknowledges a comprehensive set of 61 attributes, which are categorized into four distinct groups: Corporate regulatory, Employee's self-supportive, Workplace regulatory, and Federal regulatory attributes. These attributes function as a framework for clients and policymakers to enhance the quality of HSIC. In forthcoming periods, it is recommended to prioritize the utilization of empirical surveys conducted across diverse locations in order to ascertain the attributes that are deemed of utmost importance and necessitate significant attention.","PeriodicalId":30205,"journal":{"name":"Management Science Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The construction industry's health and safety factors: Identification and categorization\",\"authors\":\"Deep Upadhyaya, Mohammedshakil Malek\",\"doi\":\"10.5267/j.msl.2023.8.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study seeks to examine the various attributes that impact health and safety in construction (HSIC) across different companies, stakeholders, and nations. The objective is to identify these attributes and organize them within a framework to facilitate a clearer understanding. The research identified common characteristics that promote the adoption of HSIC, yielding advantages for governmental, private, and public entities. The United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and Hong Kong are considered the leading countries in terms of conducting research on HSIC attributes. There exists significant potential for enhancing the contributions of developing countries. The proposed framework acknowledges a comprehensive set of 61 attributes, which are categorized into four distinct groups: Corporate regulatory, Employee's self-supportive, Workplace regulatory, and Federal regulatory attributes. These attributes function as a framework for clients and policymakers to enhance the quality of HSIC. In forthcoming periods, it is recommended to prioritize the utilization of empirical surveys conducted across diverse locations in order to ascertain the attributes that are deemed of utmost importance and necessitate significant attention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Science Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2023.8.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2023.8.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在研究不同公司、利益相关者和国家影响建筑健康和安全(HSIC)的各种属性。目标是识别这些属性,并将它们组织在一个框架内,以促进更清晰的理解。该研究确定了促进HSIC采用的共同特征,为政府、私人和公共实体带来优势。英国、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和香港被认为是开展HSIC属性研究的领先国家。在加强发展中国家的贡献方面存在着巨大的潜力。提议的框架承认61个属性的综合集,这些属性被分为四个不同的组:公司监管属性、员工自我支持属性、工作场所监管属性和联邦监管属性。这些属性为客户和决策者提供了一个框架,以提高HSIC的质量。在今后的时期,建议优先利用在不同地点进行的经验调查,以便确定被认为最重要和需要给予重大注意的属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The construction industry's health and safety factors: Identification and categorization
This study seeks to examine the various attributes that impact health and safety in construction (HSIC) across different companies, stakeholders, and nations. The objective is to identify these attributes and organize them within a framework to facilitate a clearer understanding. The research identified common characteristics that promote the adoption of HSIC, yielding advantages for governmental, private, and public entities. The United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and Hong Kong are considered the leading countries in terms of conducting research on HSIC attributes. There exists significant potential for enhancing the contributions of developing countries. The proposed framework acknowledges a comprehensive set of 61 attributes, which are categorized into four distinct groups: Corporate regulatory, Employee's self-supportive, Workplace regulatory, and Federal regulatory attributes. These attributes function as a framework for clients and policymakers to enhance the quality of HSIC. In forthcoming periods, it is recommended to prioritize the utilization of empirical surveys conducted across diverse locations in order to ascertain the attributes that are deemed of utmost importance and necessitate significant attention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Management Science Letters is a peer reviewed, monthly publication dedicated to create a forum for scientists in all over the world who wish to share their experiences and knowledge in the field of management skills in the form of original, high quality and value added articles. The journal''s policy is to perform a peer review on all submitted articles and the papers will be appeared in a form of online on our website as soon as the review result becomes positive. The journal covers both empirical and theoretical aspects of management and gives the chance on sharing knowledge among practitioners. Management Science Letters is dedicated for publishing in the following areas: • Quality Management • Production Management (Scheduling, Production management, etc.) • Total Quality Management (TQM) • Six Sigma • Production Efficiency • Just in Time Inventory • Data Envelopment Analysis • Balanced Score Card • Activity Based Cost (ABC) • Technology Acceptance Model • Marketing planning and Customer Relationship Management • Critical Success Factors • e-learning • Customer satisfaction, Job satisfaction, Job turnover, • Organizational commitment, Employee Commitment • Knowledge Management • Knowledge sharing • Human Resources Management (Employee training, Employee Performance, Work achievements,) • Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) issues and Economic development • Innovation, Creativity, Productivity and Performance • Multi-Criteria Decision Making Applications in Management Science (AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, …) • Education Management, Social development, Public Policy • Tourism Industry, Tourism promotion, Tourism directorates • Business performance and financial performance
期刊最新文献
Expressive suppression as an emotion regulation technique and its potential impact on perceived stress The mediating effect of TQM practices on the relationship between strategic planning and productivity Optimization of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) factors: Case study of a vegetable oil manufacturing company Total quality management tools and techniques for improving service quality and client satisfaction in the healthcare environment: A qualitative systematic review Facilitators of modularity in healthcare services: An interpretive structural modeling approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1