高度整合的全球供应链环境下的现代化交通决策框架

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 MANAGEMENT Transportation Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0016
Thomas J. Goldsby, Thu Trang Hoang, T. Stank, J. E. Bell
{"title":"高度整合的全球供应链环境下的现代化交通决策框架","authors":"Thomas J. Goldsby, Thu Trang Hoang, T. Stank, J. E. Bell","doi":"10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:At the turn of the century, firms struggled to make transportation decisions in increasingly integrated supply chains that routinely stretched around the world. In \"A Framework for Transportation Decision Making in an Integrated Supply Chain\" (Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5 [2]: 71–77) T. P. Stank and T. J. Goldsby proposed an original transportation decision-making framework to address the need. The framework is cited over 250 times in the academic literature and referenced by firms seeking to optimize cost-service tradeoffs in an environment characterized by higher levels of market freedoms, service innovation, and supply chain collaboration. Since the year 2000, though, the digital revolution, customer expectations, and supply chain resilience concerns have given rise to new demands for transportation decision-making, with operations residing in a hyper-integrated and further globally entrenched state. Therefore, we revisit Stank and Goldsby's original framework to review major transportation decision areas and devise contemporary mechanisms to address the modern business environment. Our framework highlights the rapid and interdependent nature of today's corporate transportation decisions to help firms tackle current business needs and long-term strategic interests. We also seek to illuminate prospective avenues for research endeavor.","PeriodicalId":46529,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modernized Framework for Transportation Decision-Making in a Hyper-Integrated Global Supply Chain Environment\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Goldsby, Thu Trang Hoang, T. Stank, J. E. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:At the turn of the century, firms struggled to make transportation decisions in increasingly integrated supply chains that routinely stretched around the world. In \\\"A Framework for Transportation Decision Making in an Integrated Supply Chain\\\" (Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5 [2]: 71–77) T. P. Stank and T. J. Goldsby proposed an original transportation decision-making framework to address the need. The framework is cited over 250 times in the academic literature and referenced by firms seeking to optimize cost-service tradeoffs in an environment characterized by higher levels of market freedoms, service innovation, and supply chain collaboration. Since the year 2000, though, the digital revolution, customer expectations, and supply chain resilience concerns have given rise to new demands for transportation decision-making, with operations residing in a hyper-integrated and further globally entrenched state. Therefore, we revisit Stank and Goldsby's original framework to review major transportation decision areas and devise contemporary mechanisms to address the modern business environment. Our framework highlights the rapid and interdependent nature of today's corporate transportation decisions to help firms tackle current business needs and long-term strategic interests. We also seek to illuminate prospective avenues for research endeavor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在世纪之交,公司在日益一体化的供应链中努力做出运输决策,这些供应链通常延伸到世界各地。在“集成供应链中的运输决策框架”(供应链管理:国际期刊5 bbb: 71-77)中,T. P. Stank和T. J. Goldsby提出了一个原始的运输决策框架来解决这一需求。该框架在学术文献中被引用超过250次,并被企业在以更高水平的市场自由、服务创新和供应链协作为特征的环境中寻求优化成本-服务权衡的参考。然而,自2000年以来,数字革命、客户期望和供应链弹性问题引发了对运输决策的新需求,运营处于高度整合和进一步全球化的状态。因此,我们重新审视Stank和Goldsby的原始框架,以审查主要的交通决策领域,并设计当代机制来应对现代商业环境。我们的框架强调了当今企业运输决策的快速和相互依赖的性质,以帮助企业解决当前的业务需求和长期战略利益。我们也试图阐明未来的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Modernized Framework for Transportation Decision-Making in a Hyper-Integrated Global Supply Chain Environment
Abstract:At the turn of the century, firms struggled to make transportation decisions in increasingly integrated supply chains that routinely stretched around the world. In "A Framework for Transportation Decision Making in an Integrated Supply Chain" (Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5 [2]: 71–77) T. P. Stank and T. J. Goldsby proposed an original transportation decision-making framework to address the need. The framework is cited over 250 times in the academic literature and referenced by firms seeking to optimize cost-service tradeoffs in an environment characterized by higher levels of market freedoms, service innovation, and supply chain collaboration. Since the year 2000, though, the digital revolution, customer expectations, and supply chain resilience concerns have given rise to new demands for transportation decision-making, with operations residing in a hyper-integrated and further globally entrenched state. Therefore, we revisit Stank and Goldsby's original framework to review major transportation decision areas and devise contemporary mechanisms to address the modern business environment. Our framework highlights the rapid and interdependent nature of today's corporate transportation decisions to help firms tackle current business needs and long-term strategic interests. We also seek to illuminate prospective avenues for research endeavor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Transportation Journal is devoted to the publication of articles that present new knowledge relating to all sectors of the supply chain/logistics/transportation field. These sectors include supply chain/logistics management strategies and techniques; carrier (transport firm) and contract logistics firm (3PL and 4PL) management strategies and techniques; transport economics; regulation, promotion, and other dimensions of public policy toward transport and logistics; and education.
期刊最新文献
The impacts of season extension on upper Great Lakes shipping The value of supply chain orientation in entrepreneurship: Implications for opportunity evaluation and Lean Startup The vehicle routing programming of municipal solid waste collection under cognitive uncertainty Logistics customer service and customer satisfaction: Importance‐based segments for motor carriers Measuring dynamic supply chain risks for the offshoring decision in the post‐COVID‐19 era: A longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1