学校管理者变革管理策略与领导风格对教师组织承诺的影响

Ph.D Rose A. Espia
{"title":"学校管理者变革管理策略与领导风格对教师组织承诺的影响","authors":"Ph.D Rose A. Espia","doi":"10.57030/23364890.cemj.31.2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenon of change is a continuous and inherent aspect of nature. The adoption of a particular practice has become a habitual pattern for both an entity, its workforce, and its leadership. This study was conducted to examine the effect of change management strategies and leadership styles of school administrators on the organizational commitment of teachers. Descriptive survey design was utilized to provide appropriate analysis, and interpretation of results. Survey questionnaires were administered to a total of 401 respondents. The school administrators’ change management strategies an d leadership styles mean scores were obtained by administering three (3) sets of questionnaires: School Administrator (AQ) version, Teacher (TQ) version, and Stakeholders (SQ) version. Teachers’ organizational commitment mean scores were obtained through the TQ version of the questionnaire. Mean and ANOVA were used to describe gathered data and make inferences. This study found out that school administrators’ utilization of empirical -rational, environmental-adaptive, and power-coercive strategies were evident while use of the normative-reeducative strategy was moderately evident. Further, transformational leadership and transactional leadership were evident among the school administrators. Meanwhile, Laissez-Faire leadership is moderately evident. Further, affective, continuance and normative commitment dimensions of teachers were evident. Significant difference was found among the organizational commitment of teachers. Affective commitment level of teachers statistically significantly differ from their normative commitment and continuance commitment. Moreover, the degrees to which school administrators employ the different change management strategy significantly differ from each other. The use of empirical-rational as a change management strategy was found out to be statistically significantly different than power-coercive strategy and normative-reeducative strategy. Leadership styles of school administrators do not affect teachers’ commitment to the Department of Education (DepEd). Their commitment was attributed greatly to their affective attachment to the goals and values of the organization. It is also concluded that organizational commitment of teachers was influenced by change management strategies employed by school administrators but not by their leadership styles.","PeriodicalId":40276,"journal":{"name":"Central European Management Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change Management Strategies And Leadership Styles Of School Administrators: Their Effect On The Teachers’ Organizational Commitment\",\"authors\":\"Ph.D Rose A. Espia\",\"doi\":\"10.57030/23364890.cemj.31.2.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The phenomenon of change is a continuous and inherent aspect of nature. The adoption of a particular practice has become a habitual pattern for both an entity, its workforce, and its leadership. This study was conducted to examine the effect of change management strategies and leadership styles of school administrators on the organizational commitment of teachers. Descriptive survey design was utilized to provide appropriate analysis, and interpretation of results. Survey questionnaires were administered to a total of 401 respondents. The school administrators’ change management strategies an d leadership styles mean scores were obtained by administering three (3) sets of questionnaires: School Administrator (AQ) version, Teacher (TQ) version, and Stakeholders (SQ) version. Teachers’ organizational commitment mean scores were obtained through the TQ version of the questionnaire. Mean and ANOVA were used to describe gathered data and make inferences. This study found out that school administrators’ utilization of empirical -rational, environmental-adaptive, and power-coercive strategies were evident while use of the normative-reeducative strategy was moderately evident. Further, transformational leadership and transactional leadership were evident among the school administrators. Meanwhile, Laissez-Faire leadership is moderately evident. Further, affective, continuance and normative commitment dimensions of teachers were evident. Significant difference was found among the organizational commitment of teachers. Affective commitment level of teachers statistically significantly differ from their normative commitment and continuance commitment. Moreover, the degrees to which school administrators employ the different change management strategy significantly differ from each other. The use of empirical-rational as a change management strategy was found out to be statistically significantly different than power-coercive strategy and normative-reeducative strategy. Leadership styles of school administrators do not affect teachers’ commitment to the Department of Education (DepEd). Their commitment was attributed greatly to their affective attachment to the goals and values of the organization. It is also concluded that organizational commitment of teachers was influenced by change management strategies employed by school administrators but not by their leadership styles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.31.2.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.31.2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

变化现象是自然的一个连续的和固有的方面。采用特定的实践已经成为一个实体、它的员工和它的领导层的一种习惯模式。本研究旨在探讨学校管理者的变革管理策略和领导风格对教师组织承诺的影响。描述性调查设计被用来提供适当的分析,并解释结果。共有401名受访者接受了调查问卷。学校管理者的变革管理策略和领导风格平均分是通过管理学校管理者(AQ)版、教师(TQ)版和利益相关者(SQ)版三套问卷获得的。教师组织承诺平均分通过TQ版问卷获得。使用均值和方差分析来描述收集到的数据并进行推断。本研究发现,学校管理者对经验理性策略、环境适应性策略和权力强制策略的使用是明显的,而对规范再教育策略的使用是中等明显的。此外,变革型领导和交易型领导在学校管理者中表现明显。与此同时,自由放任的领导方式也较为明显。教师的情感承诺、持续承诺和规范性承诺维度显著。教师的组织承诺存在显著差异。教师情感承诺水平与规范性承诺和继续性承诺存在显著差异。此外,学校管理者采用不同变革管理策略的程度也存在显著差异。实证-理性作为变革管理策略的使用,与权力-强制策略和规范-再教育策略有统计学上的显著差异。学校管理者的领导风格并不影响教师对教育部(DepEd)的承诺。他们的承诺在很大程度上归因于他们对组织目标和价值观的情感依恋。教师的组织承诺受学校管理者所采用的变革管理策略的影响,而不受其领导风格的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Change Management Strategies And Leadership Styles Of School Administrators: Their Effect On The Teachers’ Organizational Commitment
The phenomenon of change is a continuous and inherent aspect of nature. The adoption of a particular practice has become a habitual pattern for both an entity, its workforce, and its leadership. This study was conducted to examine the effect of change management strategies and leadership styles of school administrators on the organizational commitment of teachers. Descriptive survey design was utilized to provide appropriate analysis, and interpretation of results. Survey questionnaires were administered to a total of 401 respondents. The school administrators’ change management strategies an d leadership styles mean scores were obtained by administering three (3) sets of questionnaires: School Administrator (AQ) version, Teacher (TQ) version, and Stakeholders (SQ) version. Teachers’ organizational commitment mean scores were obtained through the TQ version of the questionnaire. Mean and ANOVA were used to describe gathered data and make inferences. This study found out that school administrators’ utilization of empirical -rational, environmental-adaptive, and power-coercive strategies were evident while use of the normative-reeducative strategy was moderately evident. Further, transformational leadership and transactional leadership were evident among the school administrators. Meanwhile, Laissez-Faire leadership is moderately evident. Further, affective, continuance and normative commitment dimensions of teachers were evident. Significant difference was found among the organizational commitment of teachers. Affective commitment level of teachers statistically significantly differ from their normative commitment and continuance commitment. Moreover, the degrees to which school administrators employ the different change management strategy significantly differ from each other. The use of empirical-rational as a change management strategy was found out to be statistically significantly different than power-coercive strategy and normative-reeducative strategy. Leadership styles of school administrators do not affect teachers’ commitment to the Department of Education (DepEd). Their commitment was attributed greatly to their affective attachment to the goals and values of the organization. It is also concluded that organizational commitment of teachers was influenced by change management strategies employed by school administrators but not by their leadership styles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of the MSE sector in the digital economy in Poland and Ukraine: comparative and statistical analysis Do the young employees perceive themselves as digitally competent and does it matter? Listing switch and financial performance of companies: evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange Metaverse technologies in product management, branding and communications: virtual and augmented reality, artificial intelligence, non-fungible tokens and brain-computer interface Poland–USA sectoral trade balances: regime shifts and the nonlinear impact of currency fluctuations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1