研究科学与社会不平等:复兴与分歧

S. Epstein
{"title":"研究科学与社会不平等:复兴与分歧","authors":"S. Epstein","doi":"10.4245/SPONGE.V8I1.21366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spontaneous Generations deserves credit for calling attention to the histories and futures of scholarship that critically investigates the science/technology/inequality nexus. My own suggestion in this regard is modest: Rather than assuming that there is any single or obvious way in which scientific knowledge and technologies, on the one hand, and social inequalities, on the other, might be related (causally or otherwise), we ought to embrace complexity by considering some of the different sorts of things that the phrase “science and social inequality” might connote. However, I should signal from the outset that I won’t be taking for granted that the “reproduction” of inequality—that is, how “science and technology reflect and create social inequalities,” to quote from the opening sentence of the call for papers for this special issue—is the only relevant mode of activity that we ought to examine. Instead I will assume it to be helpful to consider how scientific knowledge and technological systems might be related to reproducing, reinforcing, chal lenging, transforming, or eliminating inequalities. As an (admittedly inadequate) gesture at the kind of complexity I hope to signal, I will take up just three of many possible points of linkage between technoscience and the reproduction of, reinforcement of, challenge to, transformation of, or elimination of inequalities. These are: the causes and consequences of unequal access to participation in knowledge-making; scientific practices of difference-making and their consequences for social categories, identities, and hierarchies; and the scientization of everyday concepts and its implications for inequalities. The first case, that of unequal access to participation in knowledge-making, relates to a growth area in STS, where scholars","PeriodicalId":29732,"journal":{"name":"Spontaneous Generations-Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying Science and Social Inequalities: Resurgences and Divergences\",\"authors\":\"S. Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.4245/SPONGE.V8I1.21366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spontaneous Generations deserves credit for calling attention to the histories and futures of scholarship that critically investigates the science/technology/inequality nexus. My own suggestion in this regard is modest: Rather than assuming that there is any single or obvious way in which scientific knowledge and technologies, on the one hand, and social inequalities, on the other, might be related (causally or otherwise), we ought to embrace complexity by considering some of the different sorts of things that the phrase “science and social inequality” might connote. However, I should signal from the outset that I won’t be taking for granted that the “reproduction” of inequality—that is, how “science and technology reflect and create social inequalities,” to quote from the opening sentence of the call for papers for this special issue—is the only relevant mode of activity that we ought to examine. Instead I will assume it to be helpful to consider how scientific knowledge and technological systems might be related to reproducing, reinforcing, chal lenging, transforming, or eliminating inequalities. As an (admittedly inadequate) gesture at the kind of complexity I hope to signal, I will take up just three of many possible points of linkage between technoscience and the reproduction of, reinforcement of, challenge to, transformation of, or elimination of inequalities. These are: the causes and consequences of unequal access to participation in knowledge-making; scientific practices of difference-making and their consequences for social categories, identities, and hierarchies; and the scientization of everyday concepts and its implications for inequalities. The first case, that of unequal access to participation in knowledge-making, relates to a growth area in STS, where scholars\",\"PeriodicalId\":29732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spontaneous Generations-Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spontaneous Generations-Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4245/SPONGE.V8I1.21366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spontaneous Generations-Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4245/SPONGE.V8I1.21366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《自发世代》引起了人们对批判性地研究科学/技术/不平等关系的学术的历史和未来的关注,这一点值得赞扬。在这方面,我自己的建议是温和的:与其假设科学知识和技术与社会不平等之间存在任何单一或明显的联系(因果或其他),我们应该通过考虑“科学和社会不平等”这一短语可能包含的一些不同类型的事情来接受复杂性。然而,我应该从一开始就表明,我不会理所当然地认为不平等的“再生产”——也就是说,引用本期特刊征文的开头一句,“科学技术如何反映和创造社会不平等”——是我们应该研究的唯一相关的活动模式。相反,我认为考虑科学知识和技术系统如何与再现、加强、挑战、改变或消除不平等有关是有帮助的。作为我希望表达的那种复杂性的一种(诚然是不充分的)姿态,我将只讨论技术与不平等的再生产、加强、挑战、转变或消除之间的许多可能的联系中的三个点。它们是:不平等参与知识创造的原因和后果;制造差异的科学实践及其对社会类别、身份和等级的影响;以及日常概念的科学化及其对不平等的影响。第一个案例,即参与知识创造的不平等机会,与STS的一个增长领域有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studying Science and Social Inequalities: Resurgences and Divergences
Spontaneous Generations deserves credit for calling attention to the histories and futures of scholarship that critically investigates the science/technology/inequality nexus. My own suggestion in this regard is modest: Rather than assuming that there is any single or obvious way in which scientific knowledge and technologies, on the one hand, and social inequalities, on the other, might be related (causally or otherwise), we ought to embrace complexity by considering some of the different sorts of things that the phrase “science and social inequality” might connote. However, I should signal from the outset that I won’t be taking for granted that the “reproduction” of inequality—that is, how “science and technology reflect and create social inequalities,” to quote from the opening sentence of the call for papers for this special issue—is the only relevant mode of activity that we ought to examine. Instead I will assume it to be helpful to consider how scientific knowledge and technological systems might be related to reproducing, reinforcing, chal lenging, transforming, or eliminating inequalities. As an (admittedly inadequate) gesture at the kind of complexity I hope to signal, I will take up just three of many possible points of linkage between technoscience and the reproduction of, reinforcement of, challenge to, transformation of, or elimination of inequalities. These are: the causes and consequences of unequal access to participation in knowledge-making; scientific practices of difference-making and their consequences for social categories, identities, and hierarchies; and the scientization of everyday concepts and its implications for inequalities. The first case, that of unequal access to participation in knowledge-making, relates to a growth area in STS, where scholars
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond Realism and Antirealism ---At Last? Tolstoy’s argument: realism and the history of science Douglas A. Vakoch and Matthew F. Dowd. The Drake Equation: Estimating the Prevalence of Extraterrestrial Life through the Ages The Relevance of Evidence from the History of Science in the Contemporary Realism/Anti-realism Debate Four Challenges to Epistemic Scientific Realism—and the Socratic Alternative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1