神秘的欧洲三位一体:工作照顾制度、政策和性别

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS Pub Date : 2012-07-30 DOI:10.4471/RIMCIS.2012.02
Anália Torres, B. Coelho, Inês Cardoso, Rui Brites
{"title":"神秘的欧洲三位一体:工作照顾制度、政策和性别","authors":"Anália Torres, B. Coelho, Inês Cardoso, Rui Brites","doi":"10.4471/RIMCIS.2012.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arguing that European family lives are affected by many societal factors, this article discusses the interplay between three sets of phenomena: the management of work and care responsibilities, work-care policies and regimes, and gender order within the family context. Based on discussions about orientations to work and care, we compare European countries and analyze regularities and singularities among them. Identifying and assessing the interplay between structural, institutional and cultural determinants of orientations we try to explain country diversity mobilizing data from the European Social Survey (rounds 2002, 2004 and 2006) and data from Eurobarometer 2003. The paper is organized around three analytical axes. First, we analyze how work and family orientations are perceived by the Europeans. Secondly, we assess different European political policies regarding work and care arrangements, the outcome being a proposal for a work-care political typology. And finally we discuss the connections between those policies and the production or reproduction of gender order within the family. We conclude that in countries with more egalitarian gender values and policies targeted at work-care arrangements, individuals experience less work-family conflict. Conversely, in countries with more traditional gender values and restricted or disadvantaged policies we found more family-work conflict. But institutional constraints don’t act alone: orientations to work and care differ according to age, education, family forms and employment status.","PeriodicalId":43006,"journal":{"name":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mysterious European Threesome: Work-care Regimes, Policies and Gender\",\"authors\":\"Anália Torres, B. Coelho, Inês Cardoso, Rui Brites\",\"doi\":\"10.4471/RIMCIS.2012.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arguing that European family lives are affected by many societal factors, this article discusses the interplay between three sets of phenomena: the management of work and care responsibilities, work-care policies and regimes, and gender order within the family context. Based on discussions about orientations to work and care, we compare European countries and analyze regularities and singularities among them. Identifying and assessing the interplay between structural, institutional and cultural determinants of orientations we try to explain country diversity mobilizing data from the European Social Survey (rounds 2002, 2004 and 2006) and data from Eurobarometer 2003. The paper is organized around three analytical axes. First, we analyze how work and family orientations are perceived by the Europeans. Secondly, we assess different European political policies regarding work and care arrangements, the outcome being a proposal for a work-care political typology. And finally we discuss the connections between those policies and the production or reproduction of gender order within the family. We conclude that in countries with more egalitarian gender values and policies targeted at work-care arrangements, individuals experience less work-family conflict. Conversely, in countries with more traditional gender values and restricted or disadvantaged policies we found more family-work conflict. But institutional constraints don’t act alone: orientations to work and care differ according to age, education, family forms and employment status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4471/RIMCIS.2012.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4471/RIMCIS.2012.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

认为欧洲家庭生活受到许多社会因素的影响,本文讨论了三组现象之间的相互作用:工作和照顾责任的管理,工作照顾政策和制度,以及家庭背景下的性别秩序。在讨论工作取向和关怀取向的基础上,我们比较了欧洲各国,分析了它们之间的规律性和独特性。识别和评估取向的结构、制度和文化决定因素之间的相互作用,我们试图利用来自欧洲社会调查(2002、2004和2006轮)和2003年欧洲晴雨表的数据来解释国家多样性。本文围绕三个分析轴进行组织。首先,我们分析了欧洲人如何看待工作和家庭导向。其次,我们评估了关于工作和护理安排的不同欧洲政治政策,结果是工作护理政治类型学的建议。最后我们讨论了这些政策与家庭中性别秩序的生产或再生产之间的联系。我们得出的结论是,在具有更平等的性别价值观和针对工作护理安排的政策的国家,个人经历的工作与家庭冲突较少。相反,在性别价值观更传统、政策受限或不利的国家,我们发现家庭与工作的冲突更多。但制度限制并非单独起作用:工作和护理的取向因年龄、教育程度、家庭形式和就业状况而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Mysterious European Threesome: Work-care Regimes, Policies and Gender
Arguing that European family lives are affected by many societal factors, this article discusses the interplay between three sets of phenomena: the management of work and care responsibilities, work-care policies and regimes, and gender order within the family context. Based on discussions about orientations to work and care, we compare European countries and analyze regularities and singularities among them. Identifying and assessing the interplay between structural, institutional and cultural determinants of orientations we try to explain country diversity mobilizing data from the European Social Survey (rounds 2002, 2004 and 2006) and data from Eurobarometer 2003. The paper is organized around three analytical axes. First, we analyze how work and family orientations are perceived by the Europeans. Secondly, we assess different European political policies regarding work and care arrangements, the outcome being a proposal for a work-care political typology. And finally we discuss the connections between those policies and the production or reproduction of gender order within the family. We conclude that in countries with more egalitarian gender values and policies targeted at work-care arrangements, individuals experience less work-family conflict. Conversely, in countries with more traditional gender values and restricted or disadvantaged policies we found more family-work conflict. But institutional constraints don’t act alone: orientations to work and care differ according to age, education, family forms and employment status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Harmonization Between Humans and Animals Particularly the Balinese Dog Race in Bali Ethics And Social Procedures In Lontara Pappaseng As A Guideline And Philosophy Of Life Of Buginese Society In South Sulawesi Hindu Religious Ethics Values and Tolerance In Darmakaya's Gaguritan An Analysis of Differences in Online and Offline Learning at Mahardika Elementary School of Denpasar Humanist, Pluralist, and Dialogical Concepts in Hindu Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1