塞尔维亚向可持续经济转型:丹麦的经验教训

Ilija Rajaković
{"title":"塞尔维亚向可持续经济转型:丹麦的经验教训","authors":"Ilija Rajaković","doi":"10.5937/odrraz2102041r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable development represents one of the key items on the agenda of governments across the globe. In parallel, numerous important acts on sustainable development have been adopted on both international and national levels, proclaiming ambitious targets on building fossil-fuel-free economies, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and environmental protection. However, some countries, particularly the Scandinavian region, significantly lead when it comes to the fulfilment of sustainable development targets, hence being a useful example for other countries to follow. On the other side, Serbia, a developing Southeast European country aiming to become an EU member state, is still at the early phase of transition towards a greener economy. Therefore, in this study, a comparative analysis between Serbia and Denmark has been conducted in the fields of clean energy production, sustainable manufacturing, and investments in green technology, to derive some useful lessons that can be applied to Serbia. Results suggest that, opposite to Serbia, broader inclusion of different stakeholder groups was implemented in Denmark, thereby ensuring decentralisation and democratisation of the whole process. Exactly in these areas could be found points for further improvements in Serbia, related to the wider political debate and stakeholders' inclusion, regulatory changes, decentralisation of energy sector, and broader involvement of financial institutions.","PeriodicalId":33823,"journal":{"name":"Odrzivi razvoj","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition towards Sustainable economy in Serbia: Lessons from Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Ilija Rajaković\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/odrraz2102041r\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainable development represents one of the key items on the agenda of governments across the globe. In parallel, numerous important acts on sustainable development have been adopted on both international and national levels, proclaiming ambitious targets on building fossil-fuel-free economies, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and environmental protection. However, some countries, particularly the Scandinavian region, significantly lead when it comes to the fulfilment of sustainable development targets, hence being a useful example for other countries to follow. On the other side, Serbia, a developing Southeast European country aiming to become an EU member state, is still at the early phase of transition towards a greener economy. Therefore, in this study, a comparative analysis between Serbia and Denmark has been conducted in the fields of clean energy production, sustainable manufacturing, and investments in green technology, to derive some useful lessons that can be applied to Serbia. Results suggest that, opposite to Serbia, broader inclusion of different stakeholder groups was implemented in Denmark, thereby ensuring decentralisation and democratisation of the whole process. Exactly in these areas could be found points for further improvements in Serbia, related to the wider political debate and stakeholders' inclusion, regulatory changes, decentralisation of energy sector, and broader involvement of financial institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Odrzivi razvoj\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Odrzivi razvoj\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/odrraz2102041r\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odrzivi razvoj","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/odrraz2102041r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

可持续发展是全球各国政府议程上的关键项目之一。与此同时,在国际和国家层面通过了许多关于可持续发展的重要法案,宣布了建设无化石燃料经济、减少温室气体排放和保护环境的宏伟目标。然而,一些国家,特别是斯堪的纳维亚地区,在实现可持续发展目标方面显著领先,因此成为其他国家效仿的有益榜样。另一方面,塞尔维亚,一个旨在成为欧盟成员国的发展中东南欧国家,仍处于向绿色经济转型的早期阶段。因此,在本研究中,对塞尔维亚和丹麦在清洁能源生产、可持续制造和绿色技术投资等领域进行了比较分析,以得出一些适用于塞尔维亚的有益经验。结果表明,与塞尔维亚相反,丹麦更广泛地纳入了不同的利益相关者群体,从而确保了整个过程的权力下放和民主化。正是在这些领域,塞尔维亚可以找到进一步改善的点,涉及更广泛的政治辩论和利益相关者的包容,监管改革,能源部门的权力下放以及金融机构的更广泛参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transition towards Sustainable economy in Serbia: Lessons from Denmark
Sustainable development represents one of the key items on the agenda of governments across the globe. In parallel, numerous important acts on sustainable development have been adopted on both international and national levels, proclaiming ambitious targets on building fossil-fuel-free economies, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and environmental protection. However, some countries, particularly the Scandinavian region, significantly lead when it comes to the fulfilment of sustainable development targets, hence being a useful example for other countries to follow. On the other side, Serbia, a developing Southeast European country aiming to become an EU member state, is still at the early phase of transition towards a greener economy. Therefore, in this study, a comparative analysis between Serbia and Denmark has been conducted in the fields of clean energy production, sustainable manufacturing, and investments in green technology, to derive some useful lessons that can be applied to Serbia. Results suggest that, opposite to Serbia, broader inclusion of different stakeholder groups was implemented in Denmark, thereby ensuring decentralisation and democratisation of the whole process. Exactly in these areas could be found points for further improvements in Serbia, related to the wider political debate and stakeholders' inclusion, regulatory changes, decentralisation of energy sector, and broader involvement of financial institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Forecast of water consumption in Serbia: ARIMA modeling Financial sustainability management non-profit organizations FDI inflow in the function of improving economy competitiveness of the Republic of Serbia The role of corporate governance in sustainable development Farmers' bookkeeping books
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1