西小高加索地区格鲁吉亚-土耳其边境附近的游牧民族用作蔬菜的野生植物

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5586/asbp.906
Ceren Kazancı, S. Oruç, M. Mosulishvili, Ł. Łuczaj
{"title":"西小高加索地区格鲁吉亚-土耳其边境附近的游牧民族用作蔬菜的野生植物","authors":"Ceren Kazancı, S. Oruç, M. Mosulishvili, Ł. Łuczaj","doi":"10.5586/asbp.906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent ethnobotanical studies in the Caucasus, mainly in Georgia, reveal the significant ethnobotanical knowledge of local people related to wild edible plants. However, few studies have been conducted in the Lesser Caucasus, west Georgia, and Turkish Caucasus. This study aims to represent and evaluate the cultural importance of wild vegetable plants and their patterns of use along the Georgia–Turkey border. During the transhumance period in the summers of 2017 and 2018, 104 participants (65 in Turkey and 39 in Georgia) were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. The Cultural Importance Index and Relative Frequency of Citation were used to compare the relative importance of species in each region. The use of 83 wild plant species from 23 plant families as vegetables was documented, with 45 species recorded in Georgia and 72 species in Turkey. One-third of the recorded wild plant species and 52 use instances out of 122 species-use combinations were shared on both sides of the border. Women and men had mentioned almost the same number of species, and there was a nonsignificant correlation between the plant knowledge and age. Although there were no significant differences in the plant parts used, the way people used plants as vegetables varied significantly across the border. Considering the floral similarity across the border, the number of species used in common and shared vegetable plant knowledge was quite low. There is not a significant difference between the two countries in terms of the most frequently cited and culturally important species ( Rumex , Urtica , and Polygonum spp.). However, the recognition of some of the most important shared species ( Heracleum , Chaerophyllum , Arctium , and Campanula spp.) diverged significantly in different administrative regions.","PeriodicalId":7157,"journal":{"name":"Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild Plants Used as Vegetables by Transhumant People Around the Georgia–Turkey Border in the Western Lesser Caucasus\",\"authors\":\"Ceren Kazancı, S. Oruç, M. Mosulishvili, Ł. Łuczaj\",\"doi\":\"10.5586/asbp.906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent ethnobotanical studies in the Caucasus, mainly in Georgia, reveal the significant ethnobotanical knowledge of local people related to wild edible plants. However, few studies have been conducted in the Lesser Caucasus, west Georgia, and Turkish Caucasus. This study aims to represent and evaluate the cultural importance of wild vegetable plants and their patterns of use along the Georgia–Turkey border. During the transhumance period in the summers of 2017 and 2018, 104 participants (65 in Turkey and 39 in Georgia) were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. The Cultural Importance Index and Relative Frequency of Citation were used to compare the relative importance of species in each region. The use of 83 wild plant species from 23 plant families as vegetables was documented, with 45 species recorded in Georgia and 72 species in Turkey. One-third of the recorded wild plant species and 52 use instances out of 122 species-use combinations were shared on both sides of the border. Women and men had mentioned almost the same number of species, and there was a nonsignificant correlation between the plant knowledge and age. Although there were no significant differences in the plant parts used, the way people used plants as vegetables varied significantly across the border. Considering the floral similarity across the border, the number of species used in common and shared vegetable plant knowledge was quite low. There is not a significant difference between the two countries in terms of the most frequently cited and culturally important species ( Rumex , Urtica , and Polygonum spp.). However, the recognition of some of the most important shared species ( Heracleum , Chaerophyllum , Arctium , and Campanula spp.) diverged significantly in different administrative regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.906\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近在高加索地区(主要是格鲁吉亚)进行的民族植物学研究揭示了当地居民有关野生可食用植物的重要民族植物学知识。然而,在小高加索、格鲁吉亚西部和土耳其高加索地区进行的研究很少。本研究旨在代表和评估野生蔬菜植物的文化重要性及其在格鲁吉亚-土耳其边境的使用模式。在2017年和2018年夏季的换人期间,使用半结构化问卷对104名参与者(土耳其65人,格鲁吉亚39人)进行了采访。利用文化重要性指数和相对被引频次对各地区物种的相对重要性进行比较。记录了来自23个植物科的83种野生植物作为蔬菜,其中格鲁吉亚记录了45种,土耳其记录了72种。三分之一记录的野生植物物种和122种物种利用组合中的52种利用实例在边界两侧共享。女性和男性提到的物种数量几乎相同,植物知识与年龄之间没有显著相关性。尽管在使用植物部分方面没有显著差异,但人们将植物作为蔬菜使用的方式却有很大的不同。考虑到跨界花的相似性,共同和共享蔬菜植物知识中使用的物种数量相当少。在最常被引用和文化上重要的物种(Rumex, Urtica和Polygonum spp.)方面,两国之间没有显著差异。然而,对一些最重要的共有种(Heracleum、Chaerophyllum、牛蒡和Campanula spp.)的认识在不同行政区域存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wild Plants Used as Vegetables by Transhumant People Around the Georgia–Turkey Border in the Western Lesser Caucasus
Recent ethnobotanical studies in the Caucasus, mainly in Georgia, reveal the significant ethnobotanical knowledge of local people related to wild edible plants. However, few studies have been conducted in the Lesser Caucasus, west Georgia, and Turkish Caucasus. This study aims to represent and evaluate the cultural importance of wild vegetable plants and their patterns of use along the Georgia–Turkey border. During the transhumance period in the summers of 2017 and 2018, 104 participants (65 in Turkey and 39 in Georgia) were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. The Cultural Importance Index and Relative Frequency of Citation were used to compare the relative importance of species in each region. The use of 83 wild plant species from 23 plant families as vegetables was documented, with 45 species recorded in Georgia and 72 species in Turkey. One-third of the recorded wild plant species and 52 use instances out of 122 species-use combinations were shared on both sides of the border. Women and men had mentioned almost the same number of species, and there was a nonsignificant correlation between the plant knowledge and age. Although there were no significant differences in the plant parts used, the way people used plants as vegetables varied significantly across the border. Considering the floral similarity across the border, the number of species used in common and shared vegetable plant knowledge was quite low. There is not a significant difference between the two countries in terms of the most frequently cited and culturally important species ( Rumex , Urtica , and Polygonum spp.). However, the recognition of some of the most important shared species ( Heracleum , Chaerophyllum , Arctium , and Campanula spp.) diverged significantly in different administrative regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been published since 1923 and offers Open Access publication of original research papers, short communications, and reviews in all areas of plant science, including evolution, ecology, genetics, plant structure and development, physiology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
The long-term survival and climatic distribution of mixotrophic and mycoheterotrophic orchids Factors determining the variability of the size of generative reproduction organs and leaves of Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link in western Poland Structures, characteristics and functions of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in various tissues rDNA-FISH pattern in selected <i>Hieracium</i> species representing different ploidy levels Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of a unique economic plant <i>Lycium barbarum</i> L.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1