共同还是封闭:波兰和美国农贸市场发展比较

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of the Commons Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/ijc.1219
J. M. Robinson, Ruta Śpiewak
{"title":"共同还是封闭:波兰和美国农贸市场发展比较","authors":"J. M. Robinson, Ruta Śpiewak","doi":"10.5334/ijc.1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do alternative food networks (AFNs) cohere as a recognizable, global initiative against the dominant industrial food system (IFS), even in differing locations and social contexts? And how can their most visible venues, farmers’ markets, through commoning practices foster the development of a food commons in different contexts? Here, we compare farmers’ markets in Poland and the United States using central/peripheral empirical research to uncover their efficacy in practicing and sustaining a dynamic food commons. We track similarities that suggest potential for building a networked movement and identify challenges that can lead to re-enclosure of the food system.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Common or Enclosed: A Comparison of Farmers’ Market Development in Poland and the United States\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Robinson, Ruta Śpiewak\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijc.1219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do alternative food networks (AFNs) cohere as a recognizable, global initiative against the dominant industrial food system (IFS), even in differing locations and social contexts? And how can their most visible venues, farmers’ markets, through commoning practices foster the development of a food commons in different contexts? Here, we compare farmers’ markets in Poland and the United States using central/peripheral empirical research to uncover their efficacy in practicing and sustaining a dynamic food commons. We track similarities that suggest potential for building a networked movement and identify challenges that can lead to re-enclosure of the food system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of the Commons\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of the Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1219\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Commons","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在不同的地点和社会背景下,替代食品网络(afn)如何作为一种可识别的全球倡议,与占主导地位的工业食品系统(IFS)相结合?他们最显眼的地方,农贸市场,如何通过共同的做法,在不同的背景下促进食物公地的发展?在这里,我们比较了波兰和美国的农贸市场使用中心/外围实证研究,以揭示他们在实践和维持一个动态的食物公地的功效。我们追踪相似之处,表明建立网络化运动的潜力,并确定可能导致食物系统重新封闭的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Common or Enclosed: A Comparison of Farmers’ Market Development in Poland and the United States
How do alternative food networks (AFNs) cohere as a recognizable, global initiative against the dominant industrial food system (IFS), even in differing locations and social contexts? And how can their most visible venues, farmers’ markets, through commoning practices foster the development of a food commons in different contexts? Here, we compare farmers’ markets in Poland and the United States using central/peripheral empirical research to uncover their efficacy in practicing and sustaining a dynamic food commons. We track similarities that suggest potential for building a networked movement and identify challenges that can lead to re-enclosure of the food system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of the Commons
International Journal of the Commons ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Indonesian collective action norm of Gotong-Royong be strengthened with economic incentives? Comparing the implementation of an aquaculture irrigation policy program The Drivers of Farmers’ Participation in Collaborative Water Management: A French Perspective The Use of the Institutional Grammar 1.0 for Institutional Analysis: A Literature Review Diagnosing Participation and Inclusion in Collective Decision-Making in the Commons: Lessons from Ecuador Westphalian Sovereignty and the Free-Rider Conundrum in the Atmospheric Commons: Examining Global Governance Regimes for Addressing Climate Change Adaptation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1