生物素在几种电化学发光免疫测定中的干扰

Q Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Anales De La Real Academia Nacional De Farmacia Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.53519/analesranf.2021.87.03.02
J. L. Martı́n-Calderón
{"title":"生物素在几种电化学发光免疫测定中的干扰","authors":"J. L. Martı́n-Calderón","doi":"10.53519/analesranf.2021.87.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Background: The aim of this study is to define the interference of biotin in several endocrine, tumor marker, and vitamin assays performed by an electrochemiluminescence method, trying to determinate the critical level that causes biotin interference. – Material and methods: Working biotin solutions were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at different concentrations (10000, 7500, 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, and 312.5 ng/mL), which were spiked on the samples to obtain final concentrations ten-fold lower. Each serum biotin dilution was tested in triplicate, using at least two levels of analytes. Determinations of several endocrine, vitamins, tumor and bone markers were carried-out with eletrochemilumenescent immunoassays on the cobas e801 and cobas e411. Comparison between the results obtained by analyzing the biotin-spiked samples and the reference PBS-spiked samples was performed using Microsoft Excel. The relative bias with the interfering-free specimen was calculated for each biotin concentration. Interference was considered significant when the relative bias exceeded 10%. Glick´s interferographs were performed plotting the percentage of change vs. biotin concentration. – Results: Analyte concentrations were spuriously decreased in 12 sandwich immunoassays and falsely increased in 11 competitive immunoassays. However thyrotropin and CA 15.3 antigen were not significantly affected. – Conclusions: Except CA 15.3 and TSH, the methods tested were susceptible to biotin interference. Falsely low values occurred in sandwich assays and high bias in competitive assays. Clinicians and laboratorians should be aware of the medical importance of biotin interference as a cause of misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment.","PeriodicalId":50795,"journal":{"name":"Anales De La Real Academia Nacional De Farmacia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biotin interference in several electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (eclia)\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Martı́n-Calderón\",\"doi\":\"10.53519/analesranf.2021.87.03.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"– Background: The aim of this study is to define the interference of biotin in several endocrine, tumor marker, and vitamin assays performed by an electrochemiluminescence method, trying to determinate the critical level that causes biotin interference. – Material and methods: Working biotin solutions were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at different concentrations (10000, 7500, 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, and 312.5 ng/mL), which were spiked on the samples to obtain final concentrations ten-fold lower. Each serum biotin dilution was tested in triplicate, using at least two levels of analytes. Determinations of several endocrine, vitamins, tumor and bone markers were carried-out with eletrochemilumenescent immunoassays on the cobas e801 and cobas e411. Comparison between the results obtained by analyzing the biotin-spiked samples and the reference PBS-spiked samples was performed using Microsoft Excel. The relative bias with the interfering-free specimen was calculated for each biotin concentration. Interference was considered significant when the relative bias exceeded 10%. Glick´s interferographs were performed plotting the percentage of change vs. biotin concentration. – Results: Analyte concentrations were spuriously decreased in 12 sandwich immunoassays and falsely increased in 11 competitive immunoassays. However thyrotropin and CA 15.3 antigen were not significantly affected. – Conclusions: Except CA 15.3 and TSH, the methods tested were susceptible to biotin interference. Falsely low values occurred in sandwich assays and high bias in competitive assays. Clinicians and laboratorians should be aware of the medical importance of biotin interference as a cause of misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales De La Real Academia Nacional De Farmacia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales De La Real Academia Nacional De Farmacia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53519/analesranf.2021.87.03.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales De La Real Academia Nacional De Farmacia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53519/analesranf.2021.87.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-背景:本研究的目的是通过电化学发光法确定生物素对几种内分泌、肿瘤标志物和维生素检测的干扰,试图确定引起生物素干扰的临界水平。-材料和方法:在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中制备不同浓度的生物素溶液(10000、7500、5000、2500、1250、625和312.5 ng/mL),并在样品上加标以获得低10倍的最终浓度。每个血清生物素稀释试验一式三份,使用至少两种水平的分析物。对cobas e801和cobas e411进行了几种内分泌、维生素、肿瘤和骨标志物的电化学荧光免疫测定。用Microsoft Excel将加生物素样品与pbs参比样品的分析结果进行比较。计算每个生物素浓度与无干扰样品的相对偏差。相对偏置超过10%时的干扰被认为是显著的。Glick’s干涉图绘制变化百分比与生物素浓度的关系。-结果:12种夹心免疫分析中分析物浓度虚假降低,11种竞争性免疫分析中分析物浓度虚假增加。而促甲状腺素和ca15.3抗原无明显影响。结论:除CA 15.3和TSH外,其他方法均易受生物素干扰。在夹心分析中出现错误的低值,在竞争性分析中出现高偏倚。临床医生和实验室人员应该意识到生物素干扰作为误诊和错误治疗的原因的医学重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biotin interference in several electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (eclia)
– Background: The aim of this study is to define the interference of biotin in several endocrine, tumor marker, and vitamin assays performed by an electrochemiluminescence method, trying to determinate the critical level that causes biotin interference. – Material and methods: Working biotin solutions were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at different concentrations (10000, 7500, 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, and 312.5 ng/mL), which were spiked on the samples to obtain final concentrations ten-fold lower. Each serum biotin dilution was tested in triplicate, using at least two levels of analytes. Determinations of several endocrine, vitamins, tumor and bone markers were carried-out with eletrochemilumenescent immunoassays on the cobas e801 and cobas e411. Comparison between the results obtained by analyzing the biotin-spiked samples and the reference PBS-spiked samples was performed using Microsoft Excel. The relative bias with the interfering-free specimen was calculated for each biotin concentration. Interference was considered significant when the relative bias exceeded 10%. Glick´s interferographs were performed plotting the percentage of change vs. biotin concentration. – Results: Analyte concentrations were spuriously decreased in 12 sandwich immunoassays and falsely increased in 11 competitive immunoassays. However thyrotropin and CA 15.3 antigen were not significantly affected. – Conclusions: Except CA 15.3 and TSH, the methods tested were susceptible to biotin interference. Falsely low values occurred in sandwich assays and high bias in competitive assays. Clinicians and laboratorians should be aware of the medical importance of biotin interference as a cause of misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.13
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Farmacia� embraces all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and is a quarterly journal that publishes basic and applied research on pharmaceutical sciences and related areas. It is a medium for reporting selected original and significant contributions to new pharmaceutical knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic repositioning: importance of new therapeutic indications approved for old medicines The mRNA COVID 19 vaccine: More than a drug? Detection and management of a case of drug-resistant hypertension Galenic development of a capsule containing rosuvastatin, repaglinide, and olmesartan mini-tablets for the treatment of metabolic syndrome Novel drugs recently authorized by ema and fda (Q2, 2024)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1