五人制足球进球的时间分析:两种模型的比较

Q2 Health Professions Human Movement Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hm.2022.108319
G. Moraes, Vinicius Soares, J. Chiminazzo
{"title":"五人制足球进球的时间分析:两种模型的比较","authors":"G. Moraes, Vinicius Soares, J. Chiminazzo","doi":"10.5114/hm.2022.108319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. In futsal, the goal is the most important situation that can lead the teams to victory. the understanding of when they are scored can help adopting effective strategies, increasing the chances of victory. this study aimed to compare 2 models for analysing goals scored in futsal as a function of time. Methods. Overall, 1122 goals were analysed in 194 matches of the 2018 Brazilian Futsal League, male adult category. the playing time was divided into four 10-minute periods (conventional model) and eight 5-minute periods (alternative model). the goal occurrence was compared with mixed models of repeated measures, and the fit of models by Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Results. Both models were statistically significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the means of goals were different depending on the periods. the conventional model showed that the mean of goals was higher in the final 10 minutes ( p < 0.001); the alternative model implied that from the seventh to the eighth period the mean of goals increased by 39.1% (95% CI: 0.27–0.64, p < 0.001). In addition, the 5-minute model revealed a better fit than the 10-minute model in accordance with AIC and BIC. Conclusions. this finding suggests that more reliable models are useful for better understanding of how the frequency of crucial events, such as goals, changes in the course of a match. We provide information for the coaching staff to strategi-cally think about the best situations for their teams to succeed in competitive matches.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal analysis of goals scored in futsal: a comparison of two models\",\"authors\":\"G. Moraes, Vinicius Soares, J. Chiminazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/hm.2022.108319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. In futsal, the goal is the most important situation that can lead the teams to victory. the understanding of when they are scored can help adopting effective strategies, increasing the chances of victory. this study aimed to compare 2 models for analysing goals scored in futsal as a function of time. Methods. Overall, 1122 goals were analysed in 194 matches of the 2018 Brazilian Futsal League, male adult category. the playing time was divided into four 10-minute periods (conventional model) and eight 5-minute periods (alternative model). the goal occurrence was compared with mixed models of repeated measures, and the fit of models by Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Results. Both models were statistically significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the means of goals were different depending on the periods. the conventional model showed that the mean of goals was higher in the final 10 minutes ( p < 0.001); the alternative model implied that from the seventh to the eighth period the mean of goals increased by 39.1% (95% CI: 0.27–0.64, p < 0.001). In addition, the 5-minute model revealed a better fit than the 10-minute model in accordance with AIC and BIC. Conclusions. this finding suggests that more reliable models are useful for better understanding of how the frequency of crucial events, such as goals, changes in the course of a match. We provide information for the coaching staff to strategi-cally think about the best situations for their teams to succeed in competitive matches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Movement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Movement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.108319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2022.108319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。在五人制比赛中,进球是最重要的情况,可以带领球队走向胜利。了解他们何时得分可以帮助采取有效的策略,增加胜利的机会。本研究旨在比较分析五人制进球作为时间函数的两种模型。方法。总的来说,在2018年巴西五人制足球联赛的194场比赛中,研究人员分析了1122个进球。比赛时间分为4个10分钟的时段(常规模式)和8个5分钟的时段(另类模式)。将目标发生情况与重复测量的混合模型进行比较,并采用赤池信息准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)对模型进行拟合。结果。两种模型均具有统计学显著性(p < 0.001),表明目标均值随时期不同而不同。常规模型显示,最后10分钟进球均值较高(p < 0.001);替代模型表明,从第7期到第8期,平均目标增加了39.1% (95% CI: 0.27-0.64, p < 0.001)。此外,根据AIC和BIC, 5分钟模型比10分钟模型更适合。结论。这一发现表明,更可靠的模型有助于更好地理解关键事件(如进球)在比赛过程中的变化频率。我们为教练组提供信息,以战略性地思考他们的球队在竞技比赛中取得成功的最佳情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal analysis of goals scored in futsal: a comparison of two models
Purpose. In futsal, the goal is the most important situation that can lead the teams to victory. the understanding of when they are scored can help adopting effective strategies, increasing the chances of victory. this study aimed to compare 2 models for analysing goals scored in futsal as a function of time. Methods. Overall, 1122 goals were analysed in 194 matches of the 2018 Brazilian Futsal League, male adult category. the playing time was divided into four 10-minute periods (conventional model) and eight 5-minute periods (alternative model). the goal occurrence was compared with mixed models of repeated measures, and the fit of models by Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Results. Both models were statistically significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the means of goals were different depending on the periods. the conventional model showed that the mean of goals was higher in the final 10 minutes ( p < 0.001); the alternative model implied that from the seventh to the eighth period the mean of goals increased by 39.1% (95% CI: 0.27–0.64, p < 0.001). In addition, the 5-minute model revealed a better fit than the 10-minute model in accordance with AIC and BIC. Conclusions. this finding suggests that more reliable models are useful for better understanding of how the frequency of crucial events, such as goals, changes in the course of a match. We provide information for the coaching staff to strategi-cally think about the best situations for their teams to succeed in competitive matches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Postural control and ankle joint functions: an investigation on collegiate female volleyball players Assessment of the correlation between the occurrence of fine movements of the hand, pre-frailty, and body composition in the elderly Does the direction of shapes and bodies influence the aesthetic perception of stage setups in dance? Adhesive elastic tape modifies forefoot motion in young women with flatfoot Performance enhancing strategies in sailing sports: beyond training and nutrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1